By Plenary Sessions: Andre Hanimägi

The individual's involvement is tied to the work of the Riigikogu Legal Affairs Committee, where they participated in a discussion on April 14th and made proposals for placing the draft bill on the agenda on April 22nd. This operational pattern is aimed at managing the processing of legislation and presenting committee reports to the plenary session. They are actively engaged in scheduling the readings of draft bills and coordinating procedural decisions.

Insufficient data. (One instance of participation in the plenary session, taking the form of asking a question, has been documented.)

The data indicates active participation in posing questions during the plenary session, encompassing both the initial query and subsequent follow-up questions. The speaker also intervenes on procedural matters to ensure that the questions are answered substantively.

The strategy is focused on debating the minister during the plenary session and initiating specific intra-parliamentary measures. This includes submitting a formal query to the government and proposing that the Prosecutor General be heard by the Legal Affairs Committee. Furthermore, proposals are being made to establish new action plans spanning multiple ministries.

The established mode of operation is presenting at a plenary session, where a high state official (the Chancellor of Justice) is addressed directly regarding the resolution of a specific legislative problem. This pattern of action indicates active participation in legislative discussions.