By Plenary Sessions: Andre Hanimägi

The style is formal, but includes light humor and a positive introduction directed at the minister (a reference to the "telemarket rug"). The tone is direct and questioning, focusing on a logical explanation regarding the law's limitations and timeline. The topic of criminals working with children adds moderate urgency and concern to the rhetoric.

The rhetorical style is initially surprised and defensive, quickly shifting to being direct and argumentative, using strong contrasts (e.g., the Centre Party versus the PPA). The speaker employs both logical appeal and direct criticism regarding the opponents’ procedural inaction. He acknowledges the government’s “bungling” in drafting the legislation but maintains focus on a swift solution.

The rhetorical style is formal and critical, presenting sharp questions to the minister regarding the contradictions in government policy. A logical appeal is employed, contrasting the government's claims concerning VAT on foodstuffs with the actual outcomes of the income tax changes.