By Plenary Sessions: Peeter Ernits

The opposition is directed at Kristen Michal's government and coalition, who stand accused of lacking a grasp on reality and exhibiting sheer recklessness, particularly concerning the presentation of the "wealth budget." The criticism is twofold: political (stagnation) and procedural (the coalition's poor attendance in the chamber and their disregard for proposed amendments). The speaker endorses the critique made by colleague Jaanson, labeling this administration a "government of the blind and the deaf."

Strong opposition has been directed at the Minister of Agriculture due to his absence and lack of availability during the crisis and important sessions. Criticism is also aimed at the rigidity of the Riigikogu and the decision by a specific MP (Õnne Pillak) to forcefully terminate the debates. The criticism is primarily procedural and action-based, rather than a substantive attack on the policy itself.

The main criticism is directed at Prime Minister Kristen Michal and his party (the Reform Party), who stand accused of concealing information, creating uncertainty, and making a mockery of security. The criticism is intense and personal, hinting that the government will soon have to "take a rest" and that their support is "ridiculously low."

The primary criticism targets the fiscal policy of the government or responsible institutions (the Bank of Estonia), which is deemed illogical because a low debt burden is maintained despite serious social problems. The criticism is based on both policy and logic.

The confrontation is directed against the ruling government coalition and specific ministers (Minister of the Interior Taro, Jürgen Ligi), who are accused of laxity, laziness, and violating the constitution. The criticism is intense and uncompromising, particularly concerning laws related to control and surveillance ("thought police"). The coalition is described as being "in agony" and acting "pig-headedly."

The main opponents are the governing coalition, particularly the Reform Party and Estonia 200. The criticism is intense and centers on the coalition's lack of credibility and the disregard for parliamentary working procedures (attendance).

The main opponents are Ando Kiviberg and Maris Lauri, who are being criticized for "stubbornly" re-submitting the super database bill. Criticism is also aimed at former Minister of the Interior Igor Taro and the Eesti 200 faction, the latter of whom are criticized for procedural passivity in their role as the head of the Constitutional Committee.

The primary criticism is aimed at the Ministry of Culture and the Ministry of Rural Affairs, which are accused of mismanagement and the elimination of regional jobs. The government as a whole is described as weak and decaying ("a rotten tree"), prioritizing defense expenditures above social spending. The criticism is intense and accusatory, spanning everything from political incompetence to the sowing of "war hysteria."

The opposition is aimed at those who tried to slap together a super database in a mad rush before the summer season, and who are now secretly preparing to bring it back out. The criticism is procedural, focusing on the lack of consultations with the Financial Supervisory Authority.

The primary conflict is with the government and the coalition, focusing on criticism of the minister's personal conduct (arrogance, maintaining a certain lifestyle/image) and unethical decisions (specifically, the Health Insurance Fund gift). Procedural criticism targets the coalition's "steamroller" tactics in voting down draft bills, as well as the incompetence of officials (evidenced by confusion over directives and regulations). The speaker demands the minister's resignation due to a lack of integrity.

The primary opponent is the prime minister and the ruling coalition, who stand accused of outright failure in economic management. The criticism is intense and focuses on the tangible outcomes of the government's performance, rather than merely on procedures. Estonia's failures in controlling inflation are being contrasted with the successes achieved by neighboring states.

The opposition's stance is aimed directly at Minister of Defense Hanno Pevkur and the Reform Party, who are being branded as a "bragging bunch." The criticism is intense and focuses on the government's inefficiency, slow response times (specifically citing the Defense Committee's week-long recess), and the "disarray" within the Ministry of Defense. The attacks are both political and personal, demanding the Minister of Defense's resignation.

Criticism is primarily aimed at the Minister of Regional Affairs and other government members, who are accused of lax leadership and vacationing during the crisis (e.g., the attack drone incident in Elva municipality, the outbreak). The government’s budget policy is criticized for squeezing small subsidies and the uncontrolled financing of the Ministry of Defence. Personal attacks are intense and include sarcasm (referencing the minister’s “important work,” such as pig mating).

The criticism is primarily aimed at Prime Minister Kristen Michal and the ruling coalition, accusing them of unfairness, double standards, and neglecting rural areas. The critic criticizes the policies and rhetoric of ministers (Terras, Pevkur, Purga) and specifically faults the Reform Party for the timing of the agriculture minister's address. The criticism is intense, going so far as to accuse the government of feeding Putin's war machine.