By Months: Urve Tiidus
Total Months: 9
Fully Profiled: 9
11.2025
5 Speeches
The style is predominantly formal and procedural, focusing on the details of the bill's handling and decisions reached by consensus. A brief lyrical digression, specifically the metaphor of sailors, is employed to illustrate the importance of international agreements. The tone in both answers and questions is expert, solution-oriented, and respectful, deferring technical issues to the judgment of specialists.
10.2025
26 Speeches
The rhetorical style is formal and deferential, directly addressing the director and the minister. The tone is inquisitive and demands clarification, centering on the need to obtain logical, fact-based assurance regarding the budget's execution.
09.2025
15 Speeches
The discourse style is formal and analytical, concentrating on detailed questions and a comprehensive report on the commission's work. The tone is neutral and fact-based, continually seeking justifications (HLÜ regulation) and practical examples (food security). Logical appeals are employed, referencing physics and market logic when clarifying the diameter of the cable conduit.
06.2025
13 Speeches
The speaker's style is predominantly formal, neutral, and procedural, which is typical for the role of a commission rapporteur. Instead of emotional appeals, he employs logical arguments, grounding them in laws, protocols, and the official positions of civil servants. Personal opinions are rarely voiced, and they are always clearly separated from the commission's official stance, often emphasizing responsibility and development (e.g., the capacity for risk assessment).
05.2025
9 Speeches
The style is highly formal and procedural, constantly addressing the ministers ("Esteemed Chairman! Esteemed Minister!"). The speaker relies heavily on logical arguments, utilizing statistics and international forecasts (e.g., the World Economic Forum). The tone is analytical and inquisitive, aiming to emphasize the significance and future impact of the topics, while remaining neutral.
04.2025
7 Speeches
The rhetorical style is highly formal and respectful, repeatedly addressing the ministers, the chairman, and the Chancellor of Justice. The speaker poses analytical and well-considered questions, often highlighting the two sides of the issues (positive progress versus reduced privacy) as well as future-oriented existential choices. The tone is logical and concerned, particularly regarding cybersecurity and AI.
03.2025
2 Speeches
The rhetorical style is formal and interrogative, respectfully addressing the chairman, the prime minister, and the presenter alike. The focus is placed on logical argumentation and the clarification of statistical data, while emotional appeals are avoided. Questions are aimed at forecasting specific trends and eliciting detailed information.
02.2025
7 Speeches
The rhetorical style is highly formal and procedural, strictly adhering to parliamentary etiquette ("Esteemed Chairman! Esteemed Minister!"). The speaker focuses on facts, the substance of the draft legislation, and requesting specific data, favoring analytical questions that require metrics (such as efficiency or procedural streamlining) or statistics. The delivery is neutral and businesslike, avoiding emotional appeals.
01.2025
4 Speeches
The rhetorical style is highly formal and respectful, repeatedly employing salutations such as "Esteemed Chairman" and "Esteemed Minister." The speaker poses pointed, yet logical questions, focusing on demanding specific data and figures, and scrutinizing the precise wording of legislation. Emotional appeals are entirely absent; the emphasis remains strictly on rational and procedural criticism.