By Plenary Sessions: Urve Tiidus

The speaker's style is formal and respectful, addressing both the chairperson and the minister. The tone is one of concern ("dangerous dependence") but constructive, focusing on a logical and specific question aimed at obtaining practical examples. Instead of emotional appeals, factual confirmation of the work that has been accomplished is sought.

The speech style is formal and respectful, directed specifically at the session chair and the Governor of the Bank of Estonia. It employs a logical appeal, presenting factual data and inquiring about its implications, maintaining a neutral and analytical tone throughout.

The style is formal and interrogative, directly addressing the director and the Chancellor of Justice. The speaker employs a logical appeal, presenting a complex dilemma that places domestic principles within a global context. The tone is analytical and solution-seeking, asking: "How can we guarantee the principle of our constitution...?"

The style is polite and formal, addressing both the manager and the presenter respectfully. The speaker poses direct, information-gathering questions, seeking both a technical comparison and a practical solution to the problem of fraud ("a key solution").

The rhetorical style is formal, neutral, and procedural, which is characteristic of a commission rapporteur. The focus lies on the factual reporting of the Economic Committee's discussion and the referencing of the questions posed and the answers provided. The arguments are logical, relying on official explanations and relevant legislation, thereby avoiding emotional language.

The tone is formal, respectful, and inquisitive, directed toward the manager and the rapporteur. The style is logical and data-driven, concentrating on the clarification of specific facts and projections. Instead of emotional appeals, references are made to legal authority (the Chancellor of Justice) and the substance of the draft legislation.