By Plenary Sessions: Urve Tiidus
Total Sessions: 87
Fully Profiled: 87
2025-10-15
The 15th Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
The rhetorical style is formal and analytical, beginning with a specific, significant data point to capture attention. The tone is serious and focuses on a strategic question regarding the future competitiveness of the European Union and Estonia, presenting it directly to the presenter.
2025-10-14
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The rhetorical style is formal, neutral, and informative, typical of a steering committee's report to the plenary session. The focus is on logical arguments and the presentation of facts, detailing the course of the committee's discussion, the questions posed, and the responses received. Emotional or personal appeals are absent; the objective is procedural clarity.
2025-10-09
15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The style is formal and respectful, utilizing addresses such as "Dear Chairman/Presenter." Logical and data-driven questions are employed, requiring detailed forecasts and explanations from the presenter. One speaker offers praise for the presentation ("excellent presentation") before posing a question, which indicates a courteous approach.
2025-10-08
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The style is formal and procedural, focusing on communicating the work and decisions of the steering committee to the plenary. The tone is neutral and supportive, but includes a brief personal recommendation to underscore the necessity of joining ("I recommend joining as a coastal resident"). The presentation is logical and based on the facts presented in the committee and the answers provided to questions.
2025-10-07
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The rhetorical style is formal and deferential, addressing the minister directly to seek clarification (Esteemed Chair! Esteemed Minister!). A direct and specific question format is employed, focusing on facts and the consequences of the policy, without resorting to emotional appeals.
2025-09-24
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.
The speaker's style is formal and respectful, addressing both the chairperson and the minister. The tone is one of concern ("dangerous dependence") but constructive, focusing on a logical and specific question aimed at obtaining practical examples. Instead of emotional appeals, factual confirmation of the work that has been accomplished is sought.
2025-09-18
15th Estonian Parliament, 6th sitting, plenary session.
The speech style is formal and respectful, directed specifically at the session chair and the Governor of the Bank of Estonia. It employs a logical appeal, presenting factual data and inquiring about its implications, maintaining a neutral and analytical tone throughout.
2025-09-16
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.
The style is formal and interrogative, directly addressing the director and the Chancellor of Justice. The speaker employs a logical appeal, presenting a complex dilemma that places domestic principles within a global context. The tone is analytical and solution-seeking, asking: "How can we guarantee the principle of our constitution...?"
2025-09-11
15th Riigikogu, 6th plenary sitting
The style is polite and formal, addressing both the manager and the presenter respectfully. The speaker poses direct, information-gathering questions, seeking both a technical comparison and a practical solution to the problem of fraud ("a key solution").
2025-09-10
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
The rhetorical style is formal, neutral, and procedural, which is characteristic of a commission rapporteur. The focus lies on the factual reporting of the Economic Committee's discussion and the referencing of the questions posed and the answers provided. The arguments are logical, relying on official explanations and relevant legislation, thereby avoiding emotional language.
2025-09-09
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session.
The tone is formal, respectful, and inquisitive, directed toward the manager and the rapporteur. The style is logical and data-driven, concentrating on the clarification of specific facts and projections. Instead of emotional appeals, references are made to legal authority (the Chancellor of Justice) and the substance of the draft legislation.
2025-06-18
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The style is formal and questioning, respectfully addressing both the Chairman and the Minister. An ethical and human appeal is utilized, requesting the Minister to assess the draft bill's effect on teachers' motivation and joy.
2025-06-17
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The style of speech is formal and procedural, utilizing forms of address directed toward the director and the minister. The emphasis is placed on logical, question-driven discussion, the purpose of which is to obtain clear information regarding the scope and availability of the data within the register.
2025-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The style of communication is formal and objective, focusing on the presentation of facts. The tone is procedural and logical, emphasizing the consensus decisions made by the commission and the stages of the procedure. Emotional or personal appeals are entirely absent.
2025-06-10
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting.
The style is formal and respectful, addressing the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court and the Director. The address is structured around a fact-based framing of the issue, utilizing specific statistics to raise systemic problems (exam difficulty, level of education). The tone is analytical and investigative.
2025-06-05
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session.
The rhetorical style is formal, respectful, and interrogative, politely addressing both the chairman and the presenter. The discourse is focused on the logical and analytical framing of questions, seeking strategic advice from experts without resorting to emotional appeals.
2025-06-04
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker's style is highly formal, factual, and procedural, focusing on the precise reporting of the committee's discussion, participants' standpoints, and voting results. The tone is neutral and analytical, avoiding emotional appeals. Personal opinions are rarely presented and are clearly marked, offering instead a philosophical and educational perspective on risk behavior.
2025-06-03
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fifth session, plenary session
The style is formal and respectful, addressing the Director and the Minister directly. The address is brief, focusing on a logical and specific framing of the issue, and requesting a short explanation regarding the implementation and costs of the reform.
2025-05-21
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
The rhetorical style is formal, neutral, and procedural, which is typical of a committee report. The focus is on logical argumentation and the presentation of facts, summarizing the questions raised within the committee (e.g., safety, pricing, competition) and the explanations received. Emotional appeals are not used; the emphasis is placed on objectively conveying the bill's procedural history and its substance.
2025-05-20
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The style is highly formal and respectful, repeatedly addressing the Head/Director and the Minister. The speaker employs an analytical and question-centric approach, referencing the claims made in the explanatory memorandum and posing relevant and hypothetical questions. The tone is neutral and information-seeking.
2025-05-15
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The rhetorical style is formal and respectful, directly addressing the chairman and the minister. The speaker poses questions in a logical and investigative manner, focusing on the details and consequences of policy implementation. The tone is serious and demanding.
2025-05-13
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
The style is formal and respectful, addressing both the Chairman/Director and the Minister ("Esteemed Chairman! Esteemed Minister!"). The rhetoric is purely logical and focuses on a specific fact-based question, avoiding emotional appeals or narratives.
2025-05-08
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The style is formal and respectful, directly addressing the Minister with specific questions. The speaker employs logical argumentation and data (facts, forecasts) to underscore the gravity of the security issues. The tone is analytical, drawing a distinction between necessary regulations (cybersecurity) and criticized draft legislation (the sustainability report).
2025-05-06
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The language used is formal and respectful, addressing both the Chairman and the Minister ("Esteemed Chairman! Esteemed Minister!"). The rhetoric is logical and data-driven, utilizing statistics and forecasts (for 2030) to underscore the gravity of the issue. The tone is analytical and focuses on the future challenge.
2025-05-05
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The style is formal and respectful, addressing both the director/chair and the minister. The rhetoric is analytical and focused on questions, employing a logical appeal to compel the minister to clearly define the bill’s strongest point of support. A hypothetical situation (explaining it to someone unfamiliar with jurisprudence/law) is used to sharpen the argument.
2025-04-23
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The rhetorical style is formal, courteous, and procedural, utilizing standard forms of address ("Esteemed Chairman! Esteemed Minister!"). The speaker concentrates on logical and fact-based questions to gain clarity regarding the bill's origin and technical implementation, while strictly avoiding emotional appeals.
2025-04-22
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The rhetorical style is formal and respectful, utilizing the forms of address "Esteemed Chairman" and "Esteemed Minister." The tone is concerned, yet constructive, framing artificial intelligence as a decades-long challenge. The speech is logical and concludes with a direct question that demands an evaluation.
2025-04-15
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
The style is formal and logical, beginning with a balanced introduction to the topic and analyzing the two facets of IT development. The tone shifts to become more critical and pressing when the duty to ensure national security is emphasized and pointed questions are raised about the effectiveness of apprehending cyber-criminals.
2025-04-10
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The rhetorical style is formal, respectful, and questioning, addressing both the Director and the Chancellor of Justice. The address is brief and focuses on logical counsel, using the saying ("practice gives quality to knowledge") as its introduction.
2025-04-09
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The rhetorical style is formal and respectful, addressing both the chairman and the minister. The tone is direct and questioning, focusing on the conceptual and logical connection between future trends and the current bill. Emotional or narrative appeals are absent.
2025-04-08
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The rhetorical style is formal and polite, focusing strictly on the logical and analytical framing of the issue. The speaker respectfully addresses both the presiding officer and the minister, posing a brief, specific, and data-driven question.
2025-03-20
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The rhetorical style is highly formal and respectful, utilizing the salutations "Esteemed Chairman" and "Esteemed Presenter." The tone is neutral and focuses on a logical, data-driven question, seeking clarification regarding the statistics that were presented. Emotional or aggressive elements are absent.
2025-03-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The style is formal and respectful, addressing the Chairman and the Prime Minister. The rhetoric is logical and data-driven, relying on specific figures and trends. The tone is analytical, shifting from acknowledging positive progress to demanding a specific future prognosis.
2025-02-26
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The rhetorical style is highly formal and respectful, repeatedly employing polite forms of address ("Esteemed Chairman! Esteemed Minister!"). The speaker poses direct, analytical questions, focusing on logical arguments and clarifying specific data or the implications of the law. Emotional or personal appeals are absent.
2025-02-20
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session.
The style is formal and respectful, directly addressing the Director and the President of the Olympic Committee. The speaker is straightforward and inquisitive, demanding concrete, action-oriented steps. The emphasis is on a logical and constructive political discussion.
2025-02-19
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary sitting
The rhetorical style is formal, substantive, and procedural, characteristic of the rapporteur of the steering committee. The speech is structured around logical reporting, focusing on the delivery of discussions held within the committee, ministry explanations, and consensus decisions. The tone is neutral and objective, avoiding emotional appeals.
2025-02-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The speaking style is formal and respectful, involving direct address to the Minister and the Head. The focus is on a logical and data-based approach, presenting a specific question aimed at quantifying the expected outcome. The tone is neutral and businesslike.
2025-02-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The rhetorical style is formal and interrogative, respectfully addressing the Chairman and the Minister. A logical structure is employed, starting with a reference to an expert's claim presented in the media, in order to arrive at an analytical policy question.
2025-01-29
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The style is formal, respectful, and interrogative, addressing both the director and the Chancellor of Justice. The speaker employs rhetorical questions to draw attention to quality issues within the legislative process and demands objective justification for the necessity of the proposed amendments. The overall tone is predominantly logical and procedural.
2025-01-28
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The rhetorical style is formal and challenging, utilizing respectful forms of address ("Esteemed Chairman! Esteemed Minister!"). The focus is on logical and political gaps, demanding a clear rationale for goal setting and the presentation of data. The tone is direct and analytical.
2025-01-15
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The rhetorical style is highly formal and respectful, politely addressing both the chairman and the presenter. The focus is on a logical and data-driven framing of the question, demanding specific financial data, with emotional appeals being entirely absent.
2024-12-18
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The style is formal and polite, addressing both the Director and the Minister respectfully. A logical and information-seeking approach is employed, contrasting standard strict testing with the risks associated with the hospital exemption. The speaker requests a brief and clear explanation.
2024-12-17
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The rhetorical style is formal, respectful, and analytical, utilizing standard addresses (esteemed chairman, minister/presenter). The speaker presents straightforward and specific policy questions, using historical context or a summary of the draft bill's content as an introduction. The questions are aimed at identifying the opposing side's priorities, for example, by asking them to select one key recommendation from seven points.
2024-12-16
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The speech is formal and respectful, addressing the minister directly ("Esteemed Chairman! Esteemed Minister!"). The style is analytical and question-driven, focusing on logical arguments and offering practical solutions (e.g., awareness campaigns). Emotional appeals are absent; the emphasis is placed on acquiring facts and statistics.
2024-12-12
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The rhetorical style is highly formal, respectfully addressing the chairman and the minister. Direct, analytical questions are posed, focusing on the logical principles and practical application of the regulations. Emotional appeals are avoided; the emphasis is placed on rational explanation and details.
2024-12-10
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The rhetorical style is formal and respectful, employing salutations such as "Esteemed Chairman" and "Esteemed Rapporteur." The speaker uses logical argumentation and extreme hypothetical examples (e.g., a meteorite strike) to emphasize the bill's shortcomings in providing practical solutions.
2024-12-05
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session.
The address is formal and respectful, directed at both the Director and the Minister. The style is question-focused and analytical, seeking specific data (an overview of solutions) and procedural clarity (notification). Emotional appeals are not used.
2024-12-03
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The rhetorical style is formal, polite, and analytical, addressing both the chair and the presenter respectfully. The speaker employs a logical approach, posing the question as a conclusion drawn from previous discussions, in order to achieve regulatory clarity.
2024-11-21
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session
The speaker's rhetoric is formal and respectful, utilizing salutations such as "respected chairman/presenter." The style is analytical and question-focused, seeking practical recommendations for legislators and planners. Logical arguments and references to facts are employed, raising questions about optimistic or pessimistic expectations for the future.
2024-11-14
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session
The style is formal and questioning, addressing the respected chairman and the rapporteur. The speaker employs logical argumentation, using contrast to cast doubt on the draft bill's claims regarding the absence of financial obligations, given that work with associated organizations is simultaneously improving.
2024-11-05
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session
The rhetoric is extremely formal and respectful, addressing both the Speaker and the Prime Minister using their titles ("Esteemed Speaker," "Esteemed Rapporteur, Prime Minister"). The style is direct and logical, focusing purely on requesting an assessment of information and probability, without emotional appeals.
2024-11-04
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The style is formal and respectful, addressing both the Director and the Minister. The rhetoric employed is analytical and logical, centered on confirming the positive effects of the draft bill and requesting its quantification. Emotional appeals are absent; the emphasis is placed strictly on facts and data.
2024-10-23
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session
The rhetorical style is formal and respectful, addressing the minister with deference ("Esteemed Minister!"). A direct, confirmation-seeking question is employed, which centers on logical justification.
2024-10-22
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The rhetorical style is formal and polite, utilizing respectful forms of address ("esteemed chairman," "esteemed presenter"). However, the question itself is challenging in substance, aimed at refreshing the presenter's memory, and focuses specifically on facts and chronological consistency.
2024-10-10
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth sitting, plenary session.
The style is formal and direct, utilizing the salutations "Esteemed Chairman" and "Esteemed Presenter." The speaker employs strong, prescriptive language (e.g., "must not work") and offers comments regarding points of moral and social equilibrium. He/She poses both clarifying questions and offers comments to further the debate.
2024-10-09
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth Session, Plenary Session.
The rhetorical style is formal and respectful ("Respected Chairman/Madam Chair!"). The speaker employs an intellectual reference as an introduction, followed by a specific and analytical question concerning the effectiveness and continuity of the new commission's work. The tone is investigative and focused on a practical solution.
2024-09-25
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session
The style is formal and respectful, directly addressing the Chair and the Minister ("Respected Chair! Respected Minister!"). The speaker employs logical argumentation, relying on the data (the graph) presented by the Minister, in order to pose a specific question regarding the future of the policy. The tone is analytical and inquisitive.
2024-09-18
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session
The rhetorical style is formal and deferential, directly addressing the Director and the Minister. The approach is logical and analytical, focusing on obtaining clarifications and also posing hypothetical questions regarding the expected impact of the law.
2024-09-17
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The style is formal, polite, and inquisitive, addressing the Chancellor of Justice directly. A logical approach is utilized, requesting a brief summary and a concrete assessment, while including a slight skeptical assumption regarding the outcome.
2024-09-11
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session
The rhetorical style is formal and respectful, addressing the Chairman and the Minister. The speech is logical and data-driven, focusing on a specific political issue, without emotional appeals.
2024-06-13
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Third Session, Plenary Session
The style is highly formal and respectful, addressing the session chairman and the heads of financial institutions ("respected president"). The speaker poses direct, information-seeking questions, focusing on the logical gathering of information. The tone is neutral and analytical.
2024-06-12
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session.
The style is formal, respectful, and inquisitive, directly addressing the esteemed director and the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. The communication is logical and data-driven, focusing on clarifying specific facts (the number of exam takers and their success rate) and requesting supplementary information.
2024-06-06
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The discourse is formal, objective, and procedural, characteristic of a committee report presented to the plenary session. The style is logical and fact-based, relying on the clarifications provided by ministries and the advisors to the Chancellor of Justice. Emotional appeals are absent, with the focus remaining on the necessity of resolving the legal and administrative issue.
2024-06-04
15th Riigikogu, third session, plenary sitting
The rhetorical style is formal and respectful, beginning with polite addresses to the presiding officer and the rapporteur. The discourse is question-based and analytical, focusing on the logical and practical details (deadlines, investments) involved in the implementation of the bill. Emotional or narrative elements are absent.
2024-05-30
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting
The address is formal and respectful, politely directed toward both the chairperson and the rapporteur. The style is analytical and deductive, aiming to connect the rapporteur's earlier viewpoints (infrastructure = wealth) with a specific political issue (borrowing). A rhetorical framework is employed when posing the question to circumvent the ban on providing domestic political advice.
2024-05-16
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Third Session, Plenary Session
The rhetorical style is formal, respectful, and analytical, beginning with an expression of gratitude to the Deputy Governor of the Bank of Estonia for the presentation. The tone is simultaneously critical and solution-oriented, highlighting the urgency of resolving this 15-year-long problem. Logical argumentation is employed, and alternative policy solutions are presented in the form of questions.
2024-05-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The rhetorical style is formal, polite, and respectful, addressing both the director and the minister directly. A direct question is used, aimed at procedural control, and includes a slight emotional element ("peace of mind") for assessing thoroughness.
2024-05-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The rhetorical style is formal, courteous, and analytical, respectfully addressing both the minister and the rapporteur. This style relies on logical inquiry and demanding clarification, employing indirect criticism (such as pointing out linguistic errors in the chamber) to underscore the significance of the subject matter.
2024-05-13
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
The rhetorical style is formal and respectful, addressing the Chancellor of Justice directly and employing polite forms of address. The tone is inquisitive and analytical, focusing on logical arguments and specific examples. Emotional appeals are not utilized; the emphasis is placed on gathering information and making generalizations.
2024-05-09
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The rhetorical style is formal and respectful, addressing the Chair and the presenter. The speaker employs logical argumentation and statistical data to substantiate the relevance of their question. The question itself is direct and legally well-considered.
2024-05-02
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The rhetorical style is formal and respectful, addressing the Presiding Officer and the Minister directly. The speaker employs logical argumentation, providing historical context before posing the specific political question. Finally, a direct and unequivocal answer ("yes or no") is demanded, which underscores the desire for a clear political guarantee.
2024-04-18
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The rhetorical style is highly formal, courteous, and interrogative, addressing the presenter respectfully. The focus is on logical and specific questions aimed at clarifying the details of the report and obtaining missing assessments. The tone is neutral and analytical, avoiding emotional or aggressive appeals.
2024-03-20
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The speaker maintains a polite and formal style, respectfully addressing both the chairperson and the presenter. The rhetoric is focused on logical and practical information gathering, highlighting the practical essence of the question.
2024-03-19
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The rhetorical style is formal and respectful, addressing both the Head and the Minister. The tone is analytical and solution-oriented, focusing on the logical discussion of the system's shortcomings and posing direct questions regarding a specific solution (the "recipe") and the virtual family doctor solution.
2024-03-07
Fifteenth Riigikogu, third sitting, plenary session
The rhetorical style is highly formal, polite, and question-oriented, respectfully addressing both ministers and experts ("Esteemed Chairman! Esteemed Minister!"). The focus is on acquiring logical and detail-based information, seeking clarification regarding strategies, recipients, and investment interest.
2024-03-06
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The rhetorical style is highly formal, neutral, and fact-based, typical of the role of a committee rapporteur. The speaker focuses exclusively on conveying procedural details (dates, voting results, participating officials). Responses to questions maintain a cautious tone, emphasizing the lack of information regarding the current status of the Government of the Republic.
2024-03-05
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The language used is formal and respectful, addressing both the director and the minister. The rhetorical style is analytical and inquisitive, focusing on the logical framework (six reforms) before demanding a subjective answer.
2024-02-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The language used is formal and respectful, addressing both the chairperson and the guest. The style is inquisitive and analytical, focusing on a logical comparison between the regulatory concerns of Estonia and those of other countries. The tone is measured, and the objective is to obtain additional factual information.
2024-02-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The language employed is formal, explanatory, and logic-based, focusing specifically on the technical content of legislative amendments and directives. Detailed legal and professional terminology is used instead of emotional or personal appeals, serving to clarify the objectives and substance of the proposed regulation. The overall tone is objective and pragmatic.
2024-02-13
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
The rhetorical style is formal and respectful, utilizing direct addresses to the Minister and the Chairman of the Commission. The tone is serious and concerned, centering on the public’s "existential worry." The speaker employs questions to challenge the officials, requesting that they clarify how the rules-based order is maintained in reality and how a sense of security can be established.
2024-01-24
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The discourse is formal, analytical, and constructively critical, focusing on process improvement and learning from past mistakes. The style is logical and relies heavily on documented evidence and facts, utilizing direct quotes from the vision document and specific references to the minister's report. To conclude, a lyrical digression is included, featuring a historical example (King Hammurabi's Code of Laws) to underscore the long-term perspective inherent in the legislative process.
2024-01-23
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The rhetorical style is formal and respectful, addressing the Prime Minister and the rapporteur directly ("Esteemed Chairman!"). The speaker poses questions aimed at obtaining specific information and assessing the effectiveness of the policy. The tone is rather logical and technical, avoiding emotional appeals.
2024-01-18
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The style is highly polite and formal, repeatedly employing the salutations "Respected Director/Minister/Chairman." The tone is constructive and inquisitive, expressing gratitude for the information received. The speaker focuses on logical and practical questions, seeking specific strategic solutions (e.g., a marketing slogan or expectations for local municipalities).
2024-01-16
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The rhetorical style is formal, brief, and to the point, focusing on the logical framing of the question and the data. The tone is neutral and inquisitive, aiming to obtain a technical explanation regarding policy implementation and associated investments.
2024-01-11
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The rhetorical style is formal and centered around questions. Light irony is employed initially (referencing a discussion among men about childbirth), but the main body is logical and demands specific data and a risk assessment. The tone is considered and cautious.
2024-01-10
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The style is formal and respectful, addressing both the director and the presenter. The speaker employs a logical argument, comparing previous risk warnings with current data, and poses a question regarding future certainty. The tone is analytical and cautiously optimistic.
2024-01-09
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The style is extremely formal and courteous, respectfully addressing both the manager and the presenter. The tone is neutral and logical, focusing strictly on the collection of facts and figures, without any emotional appeals.