By Plenary Sessions: Urve Tiidus

The rhetorical style is formal, respectful, and interrogative, addressing the director and the minister directly. The presentation is logical and focuses on examining specific political solutions and the impact of the law, while avoiding emotional appeals.

The speaker's rhetorical style is formal and procedural, fulfilling the role of the rapporteur for the leading committee. The tone is neutral and informative, presenting a logically structured overview of the proposed amendments, voting results, and consensus decisions. No emotional or personal appeals are utilized, with the focus strictly on facts and legislative language.

The style is formal, courteous, and procedural, particularly when reporting on the committee's work. When responding to criticism, the tone becomes defensive and resolute, rejecting the comparison deemed inappropriate ("absolutely inappropriate"). The speaker relies primarily on logical arguments and facts, emphasizing the availability of materials and financial justification.

The rhetorical style is formal and analytical, beginning with a specific, significant data point to capture attention. The tone is serious and focuses on a strategic question regarding the future competitiveness of the European Union and Estonia, presenting it directly to the presenter.

The rhetorical style is formal, neutral, and informative, typical of a steering committee's report to the plenary session. The focus is on logical arguments and the presentation of facts, detailing the course of the committee's discussion, the questions posed, and the responses received. Emotional or personal appeals are absent; the objective is procedural clarity.

The style is formal and respectful, utilizing addresses such as "Dear Chairman/Presenter." Logical and data-driven questions are employed, requiring detailed forecasts and explanations from the presenter. One speaker offers praise for the presentation ("excellent presentation") before posing a question, which indicates a courteous approach.

The style is formal and procedural, focusing on communicating the work and decisions of the steering committee to the plenary. The tone is neutral and supportive, but includes a brief personal recommendation to underscore the necessity of joining ("I recommend joining as a coastal resident"). The presentation is logical and based on the facts presented in the committee and the answers provided to questions.

The rhetorical style is formal and deferential, addressing the minister directly to seek clarification (Esteemed Chair! Esteemed Minister!). A direct and specific question format is employed, focusing on facts and the consequences of the policy, without resorting to emotional appeals.