By Plenary Sessions: Urve Tiidus

The collaborative style is open, as the speaker refers to the minister's report and uses it as the impetus for the question. The speaker seeks clarification from the minister regarding the law’s contribution, which signals a readiness to find political solutions.

The style of cooperation is consensus-based and inclusive, emphasizing that the majority of the commission’s decisions and proposed amendments were adopted by consensus. Close collaboration with stakeholders is crucial, particularly with the Estonian Association of Information Technology and Telecommunications and the Chamber of Commerce and Industry, whose viewpoints formed the basis for several of the adopted amendments.

The style of cooperation is consensual and collegial, emphasizing that all decisions made by the Steering Committee regarding the processing of the draft bill (including the conclusion of the first reading and the appointment of a representative) were reached by consensus. This demonstrates a readiness for teamwork and procedural agreement.

Insufficient data

The style of cooperation is consensual and open, emphasizing the unanimous decision made by the Economic Committee during the processing of the draft bill. Cooperation with representatives of the Government of the Republic (Minister Terras and Advisor Kurvits) during the presentation and discussion of the draft bill is also noted.

The working style is courteous and constructive, where the presenter is acknowledged and asked for clarifying details. This is a structured dialogue aimed at gathering information and policy analysis.

The style of cooperation is consensual, emphasizing that decisions in the leading committee—including the appointment of a representative and the conclusion of the first reading—were made unanimously (a consensual decision). This demonstrates a willingness for cross-factional cooperation on procedural matters.

Lack of data