By Plenary Sessions: Urve Tiidus
Total Sessions: 6
Fully Profiled: 6
2025-04-23
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The rhetorical style is formal, courteous, and procedural, utilizing standard forms of address ("Esteemed Chairman! Esteemed Minister!"). The speaker concentrates on logical and fact-based questions to gain clarity regarding the bill's origin and technical implementation, while strictly avoiding emotional appeals.
2025-04-22
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The rhetorical style is formal and respectful, utilizing the forms of address "Esteemed Chairman" and "Esteemed Minister." The tone is concerned, yet constructive, framing artificial intelligence as a decades-long challenge. The speech is logical and concludes with a direct question that demands an evaluation.
2025-04-15
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
The style is formal and logical, beginning with a balanced introduction to the topic and analyzing the two facets of IT development. The tone shifts to become more critical and pressing when the duty to ensure national security is emphasized and pointed questions are raised about the effectiveness of apprehending cyber-criminals.
2025-04-10
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The rhetorical style is formal, respectful, and questioning, addressing both the Director and the Chancellor of Justice. The address is brief and focuses on logical counsel, using the saying ("practice gives quality to knowledge") as its introduction.
2025-04-09
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The rhetorical style is formal and respectful, addressing both the chairman and the minister. The tone is direct and questioning, focusing on the conceptual and logical connection between future trends and the current bill. Emotional or narrative appeals are absent.
2025-04-08
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The rhetorical style is formal and polite, focusing strictly on the logical and analytical framing of the issue. The speaker respectfully addresses both the presiding officer and the minister, posing a brief, specific, and data-driven question.