By Plenary Sessions: Urve Tiidus

The political focus is directed at the details of the bill and its existential consequences, framing the issue as a "future-oriented existential choice regarding oneself." The approach is investigative and policy-driven, seeking clarity on the foundations for the bill's development (following the example of European countries) and its technical execution. The overall tone is moderately critical, stressing the necessity of competence and clear formal drafting.

The political position strongly centers on achieving a balance between technology and culture, highlighting the influence of artificial intelligence (AI) on how cultural life is managed and organized. The speaker addresses a question to the government, aiming to evaluate the state's capability to leverage technological opportunities to bridge the gap between culture and the younger generation. The focus is forward-looking and policy-driven, seeking solutions to rapidly evolving challenges.

The political emphasis is placed on cybersecurity and protecting citizens' privacy amid the rapid advancement of information technology. The speaker criticizes the state's ability to guarantee security, pointing to the rising number of cyber incidents and questioning the effectiveness of efforts to apprehend cybercriminals. This position strongly emphasizes the state's responsibility in ensuring security, adopting a stance of performance-based criticism.

The political focus is currently on improving the quality of law-making and integrating practical lessons learned. The speaker acknowledges the soundness of the Chancellor of Justice's proposal and is seeking guidance for members of parliament, emphasizing a procedural and evidence-based approach.

The political position centers on the technological future, particularly the rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI) over the next 5 to 10 years. The approach is inquisitive and forward-looking, emphasizing the necessity of assessing whether the bill under consideration relates to virtual counterparts—which currently seem like science fiction but will soon become reality. The overall framing is policy- and future-oriented.

The political position focuses on the practical and mathematical aspects of ensuring gender equality within the composition of governing bodies. The position is inquisitive, seeking clarification on the technical feasibility of implementing the policy when mathematical logic imposes constraints.