By Plenary Sessions: Urve Tiidus

The style is formal, respectful, and interrogative, addressing both the director and the Chancellor of Justice. The speaker employs rhetorical questions to draw attention to quality issues within the legislative process and demands objective justification for the necessity of the proposed amendments. The overall tone is predominantly logical and procedural.

The rhetorical style is formal and challenging, utilizing respectful forms of address ("Esteemed Chairman! Esteemed Minister!"). The focus is on logical and political gaps, demanding a clear rationale for goal setting and the presentation of data. The tone is direct and analytical.

The rhetorical style is highly formal and respectful, politely addressing both the chairman and the presenter. The focus is on a logical and data-driven framing of the question, demanding specific financial data, with emotional appeals being entirely absent.