By Plenary Sessions: Anti Poolamets

There is not enough data.

The speaker calls for cross-party cooperation on issues concerning the foundations of the state (e.g., national defense, citizenship, and voting rights), emphasizing that these topics require broad consensus. At the same time, the speaker criticizes the coalition for choosing a method of abrupt dismissal within the Constitutional Committee, an action that demonstrates a desire for cooperation but disappointment over its absence.

The style of collaboration is confrontational, focusing on directly questioning and criticizing the Prime Minister. Alternatives are proposed regarding procedural matters (such as sending written information), but when it comes to substantive issues, there is no indication of a willingness to compromise or engage in cross-party cooperation.

The speaker emphasizes the necessity of investigative committees, noting that they are beneficial even to supporters of Rail Baltic, as they help mitigate risks. Direct cooperation or compromise with other political parties is not detailed, but he views the investigative work as a common good in establishing the truth. He criticizes the retired generals' willingness to sit at the same table as Jürgen Ligi.

The collaborative approach is evident in the continuation of a colleague's (Varro Vooglaid's) point, suggesting cooperation within the faction and a shared critical stance. Furthermore, the earlier demands of their own party (EKRE) (such as withdrawal from Mali) are highlighted as correct steps, which points to strong internal party unity. There is no indication of a willingness to compromise with the executive branch.

Not enough data

Not enough data