By Plenary Sessions: Anti Poolamets
Total Sessions: 136
Fully Profiled: 136
2025-10-16
XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
The collaborative style is respectful and supportive, thanking the presenter for raising an important topic and acknowledging their recent observation regarding health. The speaker attempts to incorporate the presenter's professional experience (as a food service entrepreneur) when responding to questions.
2025-10-15
The 15th Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
The speaker is seeking information on whether Estonia or other member states have protested against EU tax initiatives, citing a desire for coordinated interstate resistance. Data regarding internal cooperation within the Riigikogu is unavailable.
2025-09-22
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
Domestically, support is given exclusively to the EKRE-based opposition to the government’s policy, viewing it as the only party capable of halting the green transition. Internationally, there is a demand for close cooperation with capable maritime nations (Denmark, Finland, Sweden) in ensuring Baltic Sea security, aimed at preventing Estonia’s unsuccessful attempts to act unilaterally.
2025-09-15
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting
Not enough data
2025-09-10
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
There isn't enough data. The speaker's style is purely confrontational and focuses on holding the opposing side accountable.
2025-09-04
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
The cooperation style is focused on intra-factional activity, submitting interpellations and draft legislation on behalf of several Riigikogu members (e.g., 6, 9, or 10 members). There is no evidence of openness to compromise or cooperation with the ruling coalition or other opposition parties.
2025-06-17
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The remarks were delivered as sharp and challenging questions to the presenter, indicating a rather critical and confrontational communication style. Information concerning the readiness for cooperation or compromise with other political forces is absent.
2025-06-16
XV Riigikogu, V Session, Plenary Sitting
The collaborative style is question-oriented, seeking dialogue with the rapporteur and the minister to clarify and elaborate on the details of the draft bill. The objective is to ensure that the law addresses broader needs, including those of rural areas. Information regarding cross-party cooperation is unavailable.
2025-06-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
Insufficient data.
2025-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The speaker presents all proposals on behalf of the EKRE faction, emphasizing intra-faction cooperation and unified opposition to the draft legislation. In one speech, the previous rapporteur is thanked for a good proposal, which indicates coordinated action in opposing the bills. There is no information regarding cross-party compromise or cooperation with pro-government deputies or liberals.
2025-06-09
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Insufficient data.
2025-06-04
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
No data available. The speaker's focus is on intense opposition and criticism regarding government policies, with no mention of willingness to cooperate.
2025-06-03
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fifth session, plenary session
The style of cooperation focuses on highlighting and supporting the political initiatives of former coalition partners (the government involving EKRE) and party colleagues (Martin Helme). It emphasizes the positive impact of the Rural Development Foundation loans, which was achieved during the EKRE government's tenure. Current cooperation with other political parties is not mentioned.
2025-06-02
15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session
There is not enough data.
2025-05-20
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
There is no information regarding cooperation with colleagues or other political parties. The only indication of previous collaboration is the proposal of the PPP project model during the Ratas administration, which the speaker intends to continue.
2025-05-19
15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
Insufficient data.
2025-05-15
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
No data is available regarding the willingness to cooperate; the speaker's position is purely adversarial and accusatory.
2025-05-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
Insufficient data
2025-05-13
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
Not enough data
2025-05-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting.
No data available.
2025-05-08
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The speaker is calling for cooperation with other ministers (specifically concerning the prevention of alcohol and drug abuse) in order to tackle widespread social issues. Simultaneously, he/she criticizes the government's inability to engage in close international cooperation (for example, with the FBI and Louis Freeh in the investigation of money laundering).
2025-05-07
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The speaker’s cooperation style is conditional and ironic, offering the opposing side the opportunity to come "ask for advice" and discuss school physics, thereby hinting at the opponents' lack of knowledge. He calls for the involvement of Riigikogu terminologists to discuss the aptness of the term "accidental electricity," but he offers no substantive compromise.
2025-05-06
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Insufficient data.
2025-05-05
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The address contains no references to cooperation or a willingness to compromise; instead, it emphasizes EKRE's staunch opposition to the legislation. The speaker appeals to older generation MPs (such as Enn Eesmaa), citing a shared negative historical experience, but this functions more as a cautionary warning than an actual call for collaboration.
2025-04-24
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker referenced cooperation with "EKRE and other proponents of common sense," stressing the shared objective of saving Estonian taxpayer money and restoring common sense. He/She recognizes and supports those who stand up for their communities and have witnessed the negative effects of wind turbines firsthand. Data regarding bilateral or cross-party legislative cooperation is unavailable.
2025-04-22
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
Insufficient information. The speaker refers to support for cultural sector interest groups (choir conductors, dance leaders), but does not mention cooperation with political colleagues or other parties.
2025-04-21
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Data regarding the style of cooperation is unavailable, as the address is confined to posing a critical question to the presenter concerning the establishment of an investigation committee and the preservation of evidence. There is no reference to cross-party collaboration or a willingness to compromise.
2025-04-15
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
Not enough data
2025-04-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
Insufficient data.
2025-04-09
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
Insufficient Data
2025-04-09
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, information briefing
The concern that other Reform Party members, particularly the Minister of Defense, have adopted a more reasonable tone and are trying to mitigate the damage caused by Ligi, indirectly suggests something about the current cooperation style. This acknowledges the efforts of those trying to stabilize the situation, contrasting sharply with Ligi’s destructive behavior.
2025-04-08
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
Not enough data.
2025-04-07
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
There is not enough data.
2025-03-25
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
There is too little data.
2025-03-24
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session.
There is no information regarding cooperation, willingness to compromise, or inter-party communication.
2025-03-19
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker supports the substance of the presented draft bill, commending the rapporteur for initiating it. However, this is simultaneously being used as a platform for broader criticism of the coalition. There is absolutely no mention of cooperation or seeking compromise with the opposing side; confrontation is clearly preferred.
2025-03-17
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
No data available
2025-03-13
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
The cooperative approach emphasizes the need for international collaboration, calling for the inclusion of foreign experts in the proposed investigation commission. Domestically, there is a reference to participation in the Riigikogu support group for investigating side effects, which indicates a readiness to cooperate with certain colleagues.
2025-03-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
There are no references to cooperation, co-signing, or compromises; the rhetoric is instead geared toward confrontation and opposition. The speaker stresses the anticipated return of their political force (EKREIKE) so they can establish their value-based viewpoints.
2025-02-27
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The style of cooperation is deficient; rather, attempts are being made to exploit the internal tensions within the governing coalition, citing Kristina Kallas's (Eesti 200) criticism concerning the reliability of the Ministry of Climate's data. No direct openness to compromises or cross-party cooperation is evident.
2025-02-26
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
According to the data, there is no information regarding cooperation, willingness to compromise, or cross-factional activity.
2025-02-26
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, press briefing
There is no information regarding cooperation, willingness to compromise, or cross-party activity; the speaker adopts a strictly oppositional and demanding stance.
2025-02-25
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
There is no information regarding cooperation; the speaker instead focuses on the principled correction of errors and the restoration of legal clarity. He issues a call to "everyone" to engage in principled error correction, which suggests an expectation that others should support his position.
2025-02-19
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th sitting, information briefing
Insufficient data
2025-02-17
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
There is no information available regarding the willingness to cooperate; the speaker focuses on attacking opponents and demands the immediate suspension of the policy. While the concerns of entrepreneurs (Estonian Cell) are referenced, there is no mention of cooperation with other political forces.
2025-02-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
There is insufficient data.
2025-02-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, information briefing
Insufficient data.
2025-02-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
No data available
2025-01-28
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
There is no data regarding their willingness to cooperate; the statements made are directly confrontational and critical toward the government.
2025-01-27
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The style of cooperation is directed externally, outside the Riigikogu, urging Estonian scientists, teachers, and school directors to put an end to "Lysenkoism" and restore dignity. There is absolutely no reference to cooperation with the government or other parliamentary factions.
2025-01-22
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session.
Not enough data.
2025-01-21
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
Insufficient data.
2025-01-16
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker referenced a wide circle of critics, including the President, the Chancellor of Justice, business leaders, and journalists, who have also highlighted the lack of transparency in the state budget, thereby signaling an attempt to garner public support. There is no available information regarding legislative cooperation between the political parties.
2025-01-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Insufficient data
2025-01-13
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Not enough data.
2024-12-19
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The style of collaboration during the session with colleagues or the presiding officer is personal and humorous, demonstrated by the request for a water bottle and mutual banter. There is no data concerning inter-party or legislative cooperation.
2024-12-18
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The cooperation manifested through the citing of independent positions from the Riigikogu's Legal and Analysis Department, which are used to reinforce the opposition's arguments. There are no references to a willingness to compromise or cross-party cooperation with the government; instead, the necessity for intervention by the Chancellor of Justice, the President, or the Supreme Court is stressed.
2024-12-16
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
No data available
2024-12-11
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The entire speech focuses on fierce criticism of the government's policy and highlighting its consequences. There are no references to cooperation, willingness to compromise, or cross-party action.
2024-12-09
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary sitting
The speaker positively references previous cross-party cooperation in creating the decision on "fraternal, robust family benefits," which was subsequently revoked by the current government. In the present context, the style is confrontational and aimed at challenging the government's actions.
2024-12-04
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting
No data available
2024-12-04
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, press briefing
Not enough data.
2024-12-03
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The interaction style is formal and geared towards gathering information, respectfully addressing the rapporteur for clarification. This constitutes a standard legislative interaction aimed at obtaining information.
2024-12-02
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The style of cooperation is formal and institutional, restricted solely to posing questions to the minister during the plenary session. The records contain no indication of cross-party collaboration or a willingness to compromise.
2024-11-21
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session
There is not enough data.
2024-11-20
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The speaker calls for cross-party cooperation on issues concerning the foundations of the state (e.g., national defense, citizenship, and voting rights), emphasizing that these topics require broad consensus. At the same time, the speaker criticizes the coalition for choosing a method of abrupt dismissal within the Constitutional Committee, an action that demonstrates a desire for cooperation but disappointment over its absence.
2024-11-20
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, press briefing.
The style of collaboration is confrontational, focusing on directly questioning and criticizing the Prime Minister. Alternatives are proposed regarding procedural matters (such as sending written information), but when it comes to substantive issues, there is no indication of a willingness to compromise or engage in cross-party cooperation.
2024-11-07
15th Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session
The speaker emphasizes the necessity of investigative committees, noting that they are beneficial even to supporters of Rail Baltic, as they help mitigate risks. Direct cooperation or compromise with other political parties is not detailed, but he views the investigative work as a common good in establishing the truth. He criticizes the retired generals' willingness to sit at the same table as Jürgen Ligi.
2024-11-06
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The collaborative approach is evident in the continuation of a colleague's (Varro Vooglaid's) point, suggesting cooperation within the faction and a shared critical stance. Furthermore, the earlier demands of their own party (EKRE) (such as withdrawal from Mali) are highlighted as correct steps, which points to strong internal party unity. There is no indication of a willingness to compromise with the executive branch.
2024-11-05
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session
Not enough data
2024-11-04
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
Not enough data
2024-10-23
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session
There is no data regarding cooperation; the speaker’s style is purely confrontational and critical. The speaker is rather calling on others (e.g., doctors from the Reform Party) to rebel against their own party and refuse to cooperate with them. No willingness to cooperate is expressed.
2024-10-22
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
Not enough data
2024-10-21
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
Insufficient data
2024-10-16
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The speaker strongly emphasized international cooperation, naming Latvia, Lithuania, and Poland as both role models and partners. He called for close collaboration with Ukrainian historians and legal experts in the investigation of communist crimes, offering assistance with the digitalization of archives. Domestically, it was stressed that historical work is a collective task, not solely the job of historians.
2024-10-15
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session
The collaborative style is respectful and dialogue-oriented, involving addressing the presenter directly to obtain additional information and recommendations. The speaker attempts to further develop the topic emphasized by the presenter, while searching for practical solutions.
2024-10-14
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting
There is too little data.
2024-10-10
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth sitting, plenary session.
The collaborative style is demanding and confrontational, requiring the rapporteur and the coalition to immediately remove a specific point. Although the purpose of multiple readings in identifying deficiencies is acknowledged, the willingness to compromise on this child protection issue is near zero. Cooperation is viewed only in the context of halting the draft bill or withdrawing a specific provision.
2024-10-09
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth Session, Plenary Session.
The speaker emphasizes the value of cross-party cooperation and consensus, citing as a positive example the previous agreement to increase family benefits—an issue they equate in importance to national defense. Disappointment is now expressed that the government’s first action was to unilaterally scrap this powerful cross-party achievement.
2024-10-09
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, information briefing
Few details are available regarding the style of cooperation, but reference is made to Martin Helme's stance on the scale of immigration, which indicates ideological alignment within the opposition. Information is lacking regarding any readiness to compromise or cross-party cooperation.
2024-10-07
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session
Data is scarce.
2024-09-23
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session
The speaker emphasizes that the positions of the Foreign Affairs Committee and the opinions of many coalition partners (with the exception of Eesti 200) align on this topic, which provides a foundation for broad support for the future reopening of the consulate. It is noted that while there was no consensus within the coalition, no one wanted to cause a conflict, which ultimately resulted in the wrong decision being pushed through.
2024-09-18
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session
There is insufficient data.
2024-09-16
The 15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting.
Insufficient data
2024-09-11
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session
No data available
2024-09-11
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, press briefing.
Not enough data
2024-09-09
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
No data pointing to opportunities for cooperation or compromise is available; the speaker is operating purely from a critical and antagonistic position.
2024-07-29
15th Riigikogu, Riigikogu extraordinary session.
There is not enough data.
2024-07-29
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
The general tone of interaction remains largely oppositional and critical of the coalition. Nevertheless, the speaker appeals directly to the Social Democrats, urging them to support large families. This demonstrates a willingness to test the coalition partners on specific socio-political issues and potentially secure backing.
2024-07-22
15th Riigikogu, Riigikogu's extraordinary session.
The speeches are inherently confrontational, demanding the taking of responsibility and the acknowledgment of past mistakes. There are no references to cooperation, willingness to compromise, or cross-party activity.
2024-07-15
15th Riigikogu, Extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
The speaker points to the complete failure to consider his proposal ("was not immediately given a hearing"), which demonstrates a lack or failure of cooperation with the ruling majority in this legislative process.
2024-06-12
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session.
The style of cooperation is open and constructive, given that the speaker is addressing the presenter for clarification to gain a better understanding of the importance of the legal ruling. The objective is the sharing of knowledge and achieving a mutual understanding of this complex legal matter.
2024-06-10
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
Not enough data.
2024-06-03
Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary sitting.
Thanks are extended to the submitters of the inquiry, which signals cooperation within their political group when raising serious issues (such as Bolt's illegal workforce). There is absolutely no reference to a willingness to compromise or engage in bilateral cooperation with the coalition; the viewpoints are presented in a demanding and oppositional manner.
2024-05-30
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting
There is not enough data.
2024-05-16
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Third Session, Plenary Session
There is not enough data.
2024-05-09
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
Data is scarce.
2024-05-07
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The speaker demonstrated openness to cooperation, stressing the necessity of collaborating with the City of Tallinn to realize the project for the restoration of Linnahall and the multifunctional hall.
2024-05-06
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
There is not enough data.
2024-04-30
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Third Session, Plenary Session.
The cooperation style adopted towards the minister is exacting, while simultaneously proposing a concrete solution (conducting an analysis and returning in a week). In the second call, the style is open and clarifying, seeking clear information regarding the support of interest groups, which points to a desire for a fact-based discussion.
2024-04-29
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The style of cooperation indicates intra-faction preparations, as the speaker refers to recurring meetings with the rapporteur on behalf of the faction. There is no information regarding cross-party cooperation or willingness to compromise.
2024-04-18
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The focus of cooperation is at the international level, emphasizing the need to seek advice and learn from Finland, Sweden, and Japan regarding nuclear energy. He notes that local governments and private companies are also involved in the Finnish nuclear consortium. Domestic cross-party compromise or cooperation is not mentioned.
2024-04-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The cooperation style is primarily oppositional, though it indicates a continuation of the positions held by other critical colleagues (Leo Kunnas). He emphasizes the opposition's role in restoring trust in the electoral process. There are no indications of seeking compromises or broad, cross-party cooperation on the issues discussed.
2024-04-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, information briefing
There is insufficient data.
2024-04-15
Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary session
Information regarding cooperation between political parties is absent. He/She refers to members of his/her parliamentary group (Leo Kunnas, Alar Laneman) as witnesses and allies in the previous struggle to maintain conscription, emphasizing the unity of the faction.
2024-04-09
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
Data on willingness to cooperate is unavailable; the rhetoric is purely oppositional and demanding, focusing on criticizing the opponents' inaction and failures. There are no references to bilateral or cross-party cooperation.
2024-04-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
Willingness to cooperate is not expressed; instead, the focus is on the need for a change of government. Reference is made to previously cross-party agreed-upon benefits that the current government has taken away at the expense of children, which signals disappointment over the violation of those earlier agreements.
2024-04-03
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session
Not enough data
2024-04-01
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
Cooperation is evident within the faction (referring to the faction as the representative of those submitting the interpellations) and with colleagues (Henn Põlluaas), with whom experiences are shared during exercises and visits to Ukraine. There are no signs of openness to compromise with the government; instead, they are demanding that the government cease its activities.
2024-03-20
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
No data available
2024-03-20
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, press briefing.
The speaker’s style is confrontational, demanding that the governing parties (especially Eesti 200) set an example and return the donations. A willingness to cooperate or seek compromise is not reflected in the text; instead, the necessity to distance oneself and set an example is emphasized.
2024-03-18
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
Insufficient data. The speeches focus on confrontation and criticism of the system, and there are no references to cooperation with other political forces.
2024-03-13
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting.
The speaker mentioned potential cooperation with the Latvian state regarding the establishment of a joint tank battalion in Valka, signaling readiness for specific strategic international defense cooperation.
2024-03-12
15th Riigikogu, 3rd plenary sitting
Insufficient data.
2024-03-11
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
No data available.
2024-03-07
Fifteenth Riigikogu, third sitting, plenary session
There is too little data.
2024-03-06
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
Not enough data.
2024-03-05
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session
No data available.
2024-03-04
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
There is not enough data. The speeches focus on opposition criticism and posing questions to the government.
2024-02-22
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting
The speaker is open to discussing alternative options, specifically asking the presenter whether consideration has been given to requiring electoral alliances to adopt mandatory NGO status or establishing a minimum membership threshold. This indicates a readiness to consider compromises and structured political solutions.
2024-02-21
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The speaker referenced Henn Põlluaas’s remarks approvingly and urged the deputies to support the submitted draft legislation, which highlights the cooperation among the bill’s initiators. He emphasized the shared goal of supporting an Estonian-speaking Estonia and the state language. There was no evident openness to compromise with the opposing side.
2024-02-21
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
Not enough data.
2024-02-20
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The collaborative approach focuses on mobilizing existing structures (the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, parliamentary diplomacy, friendship groups) to increase Estonia's contribution to international advocacy and pressure. It is emphasized that this issue should concern all countries that respect international law, pointing to the need to appeal to the conscience of difficult partners (e.g., China) as well.
2024-02-13
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
Insufficient data.
2024-02-07
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting.
The style of cooperation is oppositional, but the speaker expresses hope that the discussion points proposed by the government (demographics, education) will draw in another coalition party. He believes that the EKRE draft bill will find significantly more supporters in the chamber in the future, citing the potential for seeking support on specific issues.
2024-02-07
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
There is no evidence of cooperation or a willingness to compromise; the speaker is taking a strictly oppositional and demanding stance. The speaker is demanding concrete steps and intervention from the government and the prime minister, rather than offering collaboration in finding solutions.
2024-02-05
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting
Not enough data.
2024-01-24
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The speaker is collaborating with colleagues (Ants Frosch) on assessing the situation and recognizes the polite and excellent work of the Language Board. He uses a colleague's quote to strengthen his argument, showing a willingness to consult with his seatmate.
2024-01-23
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
Cooperation is demonstrated with like-minded colleagues, notably by highlighting the formation of Dr. Everaus's support group in the Riigikogu concerning vaccine side effects. Overall, however, the style remains confrontational and uncompromising toward institutions and pharmaceutical companies.
2024-01-22
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The style of cooperation is predominantly confrontational. However, the speaker positively mentions EKRE's previous proposals regarding the construction of the Tallinn–Tartu highway. There is no sign of openness to compromise; rather, the emphasis is placed on completely opposing the government's plans.
2024-01-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
Not enough data.
2024-01-16
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
Data is missing. The speaker focuses on criticizing the inactivity of other factions, but opportunities for cooperation or willingness to compromise are not mentioned.
2024-01-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
Information regarding the willingness to cooperate is lacking; the speeches focus on harsh criticism directed at the government and institutions. Cooperation with those assisting Ukraine outside the Riigikogu (Raivo Olev) is mentioned, but not internally within the parliament itself.
2024-01-11
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
Information is scarce. The speaker quotes other individuals (Varro Vooglaid, Uno Trumm, Janek Mäggi) to support his views, but there is no evidence of active cooperation, the search for compromises, or the joint initiation of draft legislation.
2024-01-10
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
Insufficient data. All appearances are focused on attacking the government coalition and its members; there is no mention of cooperation or a willingness to compromise.
2024-01-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
No data available