By Plenary Sessions: Anti Poolamets

The speaker was active during the plenary session, repeatedly asking presenters questions regarding CO2 data and delivering a longer speech during the debate on a matter of national importance (climate policy). He/She also requested three minutes of additional time. Furthermore, he/she noted the absence of coalition members and journalists from the chamber.

The speaker is highly active during the plenary session, addressing the floor multiple times on the same day and requesting extensions, suggesting a deep commitment to the draft legislation under debate. Other activity patterns, such as meetings or travel, are not discernible from the addresses.

The action pattern is restricted to participation in the Riigikogu information session, during which both procedural remarks and substantive questions are addressed to the Prime Minister. The speaker stresses the necessity of focusing on the issue at hand and proposes a written reply as an alternative.

The speaker actively participates in the plenary session, intervening in both procedural discussions (the need to terminate the procedure, the absence of chairpersons) and substantive debates. He requested additional time to present his views thoroughly. He also notes the potential need for future remote sessions in quarantine situations.

The speaker was very active during the plenary session on 2024-11-06, repeatedly posing questions and making interventions to the minister and the rapporteurs on defense force operations. This pattern demonstrates a focus on details, an emphasis on the lack of adequate answers, and the raising of procedural questions. He/She actively participates in the debate, following up on topics raised by other colleagues.

Not enough data

The data indicates participation in a plenary session on the same day concerning topics from two different fields (social issues and regional development), suggesting active involvement in debates. No other patterns or indicators of frequency are available.