By Plenary Sessions: Anti Poolamets

The remarks were delivered as sharp and challenging questions to the presenter, indicating a rather critical and confrontational communication style. Information concerning the readiness for cooperation or compromise with other political forces is absent.

The collaborative style is question-oriented, seeking dialogue with the rapporteur and the minister to clarify and elaborate on the details of the draft bill. The objective is to ensure that the law addresses broader needs, including those of rural areas. Information regarding cross-party cooperation is unavailable.

Insufficient data.

The speaker presents all proposals on behalf of the EKRE faction, emphasizing intra-faction cooperation and unified opposition to the draft legislation. In one speech, the previous rapporteur is thanked for a good proposal, which indicates coordinated action in opposing the bills. There is no information regarding cross-party compromise or cooperation with pro-government deputies or liberals.

Insufficient data.

No data available. The speaker's focus is on intense opposition and criticism regarding government policies, with no mention of willingness to cooperate.

The style of cooperation focuses on highlighting and supporting the political initiatives of former coalition partners (the government involving EKRE) and party colleagues (Martin Helme). It emphasizes the positive impact of the Rural Development Foundation loans, which was achieved during the EKRE government's tenure. Current cooperation with other political parties is not mentioned.

There is not enough data.