By Plenary Sessions: Anti Poolamets

There is insufficient data regarding the frequency, rhythm, or other activity patterns of appearances, since only two speeches from a single plenary session were provided.

The speaker's pattern of activity demonstrates a focus on a single specific legislative issue (the civil defense bill) throughout one plenary session. They pose questions to both the rapporteur and the minister, indicating active engagement during the debate phase.

Insufficient data

Speeches were delivered during plenary sessions on consecutive days, primarily focusing on proposals to adjourn the reading of several different draft bills. The speaker cited the late hour of the session and the fatigue of the members of parliament, which nonetheless demonstrates activity even during late sittings. Every speech concluded with a motion for adjournment presented on behalf of the parliamentary group.

The data indicates active participation in the plenary session on June 9, 2025, where several questions were posed to the Prime Minister and the Minister of Defense. The speaker also requested three minutes of extra time on one occasion, suggesting a desire to cover the topics in depth. Other activity patterns (meetings, travel) are not evident.

Records show active participation in the plenary session held in June 2025, where several questions were posed and extended positions were presented on various topics (wind energy, ethics, sovereignty). There is no information regarding regular appearances or a consistent rhythm outside of this specific session.

He speaks at the plenary session, addressing the presiding officer, the deputies, and the public. He requests three minutes of extra time, which indicates a desire to present a thorough and expanded argument. Information regarding patterns of activity outside the Riigikogu session is unavailable.

The speaker is actively participating in the plenary session during the supplementary budget debate, submitting a series of questions and lengthy comments. His/Her pattern of activity demonstrates detailed and persistent criticism of the government's actions, particularly concerning the allocation of expenditures. He/She repeatedly requests additional time to fully present his/her arguments.