By Plenary Sessions: Anti Poolamets

The speaker is demanding stricter regulation and enforcement against financial crime, especially concerning major banks. They criticize the current regulatory imbalance, noting that banks focus their efforts on badgering small clients while billions are being moved elsewhere.

Economic perspectives center on fiscal responsibility and ensuring the value of existing public investments. Concerns are raised regarding the waste of taxpayer funds previously spent on constructing substantial shelters, should those structures not be recognized under the new legislation.

Economic views emphasize strict fiscal responsibility and are strongly opposed to transactions detrimental to the state. The agreement concerning the housing of Swedish prisoners is criticized as commercially unsound, resulting in an estimated annual loss of 21 million euros. A detailed review of contracts is demanded to prevent financial damage.

It strongly opposes regulations (the green transition, mandatory biofuels) that increase energy and transport costs, driving Estonian businesses into bankruptcy and reducing industrial capacity (such as the Kunda cement factory). It demands a larger share of mining fees as compensation for local communities. It supports the development of domestic biogas production while opposing fuel blending mandates that drive up the price of airline tickets.

Economic views are critical of renewable energy subsidies (grants), arguing that these are astronomical sums coming directly out of taxpayers' pockets and unethically supporting the Chinese regime (under Xi Jinping). It prioritizes the protection of national defense and security interests over ideological and economically dubious mega-projects.

The speaker is vehemently opposed to the mandated green transition, arguing that it will destroy the Estonian energy industry. He voiced concerns about the negative economic effect of wind farms on biomass output, citing losses amounting to millions.

The economic platform supports infrastructure development through the PPP (Public-Private Partnership) model and is strongly opposed to the costs of the green transition that negatively impact businesses. It favors flexible road transport and criticizes Rail Baltic as a project that lacks economic demand and is not financially viable. It supports state intervention in the housing loan market in areas experiencing market failure.

The economic views emphasize the necessity of economic growth and fiscal responsibility, sharply criticizing the economy's stagnation and decline. It supports prioritizing national defense expenditures, arguing that a 5% increase in defense spending is merely "a number" during an economic recession. He opposes spending money on contingency electricity, climate measures, and supporting the sustainability of media outlets, considering these to be misguided expenditures.