By Plenary Sessions: Anti Poolamets

The cooperation style adopted towards the minister is exacting, while simultaneously proposing a concrete solution (conducting an analysis and returning in a week). In the second call, the style is open and clarifying, seeking clear information regarding the support of interest groups, which points to a desire for a fact-based discussion.

The style of cooperation indicates intra-faction preparations, as the speaker refers to recurring meetings with the rapporteur on behalf of the faction. There is no information regarding cross-party cooperation or willingness to compromise.

The focus of cooperation is at the international level, emphasizing the need to seek advice and learn from Finland, Sweden, and Japan regarding nuclear energy. He notes that local governments and private companies are also involved in the Finnish nuclear consortium. Domestic cross-party compromise or cooperation is not mentioned.

The cooperation style is primarily oppositional, though it indicates a continuation of the positions held by other critical colleagues (Leo Kunnas). He emphasizes the opposition's role in restoring trust in the electoral process. There are no indications of seeking compromises or broad, cross-party cooperation on the issues discussed.

There is insufficient data.

Information regarding cooperation between political parties is absent. He/She refers to members of his/her parliamentary group (Leo Kunnas, Alar Laneman) as witnesses and allies in the previous struggle to maintain conscription, emphasizing the unity of the faction.

Data on willingness to cooperate is unavailable; the rhetoric is purely oppositional and demanding, focusing on criticizing the opponents' inaction and failures. There are no references to bilateral or cross-party cooperation.

Willingness to cooperate is not expressed; instead, the focus is on the need for a change of government. Reference is made to previously cross-party agreed-upon benefits that the current government has taken away at the expense of children, which signals disappointment over the violation of those earlier agreements.

Not enough data

Cooperation is evident within the faction (referring to the faction as the representative of those submitting the interpellations) and with colleagues (Henn Põlluaas), with whom experiences are shared during exercises and visits to Ukraine. There are no signs of openness to compromise with the government; instead, they are demanding that the government cease its activities.