By Plenary Sessions: Anti Poolamets

The speaker actively participates in plenary sessions, posing questions both to the minister (regarding procedural errors) and to the rapporteur (for factual clarification). This pattern demonstrates a focus on debating legislation and scrutinizing the actions of the executive branch.

The speaker is active, citing repeated meetings with the rapporteur within the faction, which demonstrates participation in preparatory economic discussions prior to the plenary session.

The speaker referred to a recent practical study visit to the Olkiluoto nuclear power plant in Finland to examine nuclear energy production. They also mentioned seminars organized by the Japanese government in Estonia, which indicates active international knowledge gathering.

The speaker is active in plenary sessions, participating intensively in debates concerning election procedure and the organization of the Riigikogu's work. He/She refers to previous attempts to initiate police investigations into the Rakvere vote-buying cases and to the submitted amendments.

The speaker is participating in the Riigikogu Information Hour, submitting pointed and detailed inquiries regarding a government member's past business activities and public procurements.

An active participant in plenary sessions, submitting interpellations and follow-up questions. They demonstrate consistency, as the submitted interpellation is a continuation of a previous one concerning the accessibility of victim support services. They also actively participate in national defense debates, reacting promptly to the minister's responses.

The speeches were delivered at the plenary session of the Riigikogu, where the country's economic situation and the budget were addressed. The speaker requested additional time, which suggests a desire to cover the topic thoroughly and elaborate on their views at greater length. No other patterns of activity or events are mentioned in the speeches.

The operational patterns demonstrate active participation in the plenary sessions of the Riigikogu, where pointed questions and criticism are directed at government presenters. Speeches are brief and focus on challenging the positions of the opposing side.

The speaker is active in plenary sessions, both asking questions about specific issues (such as the politicization of the prosecutor’s office) and delivering long, ideological speeches. He mentions his trip to Ukraine, where he saw a statue of Taras Shevchenko riddled with bullets, referencing this personal experience to underscore the importance of the subject matter.

The speaker was highly active during the plenary session, presenting multiple speeches and requests for additional time within a single day. He/She referenced personal experiences and meetings, such as participating in exercises (along with Henn Põlluaas) and meeting with Ukrainian commanders and frontline soldiers.