By Plenary Sessions: Anti Poolamets

Among the social issues mentioned is the topic of halting pension indexation, in connection with which clarification is being sought regarding the support of pensioners' organizations. This demonstrates an interest in the social security of the elderly population and the positions taken by their representatives.

The social sector is currently addressing the Prime Minister's rhetoric, demanding clarification on whether the statement concerning mandatory childbirth for women was serious or merely hyperbole. This demonstrates a readiness to challenge the government's sensitive social and demographic language use.

Social problems have been highlighted through the example of Sweden, where radical social experiments have led to societal collapse (bombers, knife attackers). This is presented as a warning to liberals so that they do not turn into radical socialists, which points to a strong conservative emphasis on security and order.

In the social sector, he focuses on the vulnerability of residents of social welfare institutions during elections, emphasizing the danger of their ID cards being misused. Furthermore, he notes with concern the upcoming hate speech law, viewing it as a restriction on political freedoms.

There is insufficient data.

It focuses on the social problems faced by victims of domestic violence, demanding better accessibility to psychological counseling and psychotherapy services. It criticizes the new educational requirements set by the Social Insurance Board, which reduce the number of service providers and worsen the availability of aid.

Among social issues, emphasis is placed on the crisis in data protection and personal data security, citing the theft of highly sensitive medical, genetic, and fertility treatment data belonging to 700,000 people. This incident has been framed as the biggest failure in the history of the digital state, one that threatens the privacy and security of every citizen.

In the social sphere, the speaker is a staunch advocate for vulnerable groups, stressing the necessity of increasing child benefits and protecting people with disabilities and families with many children. The government is also criticized for withdrawing support payments at the expense of children.

The speaker is a strong defender of the nation-state and national identity, sharply opposing multiculturalism and the creation of a new nation. He/She strongly criticizes the education policy that permits Ukrainian children to attend Russian schools, viewing this as leading to the loss of Ukrainian language and culture and the deepening of Ukraine’s demographic catastrophe. Furthermore, the speaker expresses concern regarding the politicization of the Prosecutor’s Office (referencing the Lavly Perling case).

The speaker is strongly socially conservative, opposing same-sex marriage, which is viewed as a manifestation of Marxism and stemming from a program designed to destroy the bourgeois family. Emphasis is placed on protecting freedom of speech and opposing restrictions on hate speech. Regarding security, there is a demand for the extradition or training of Ukrainian men of mobilization age, alongside a warning about the risk of recruitment by Russian special services.