By Plenary Sessions: Anti Poolamets

The political stance strongly emphasizes procedural correctness and accountability, demanding comprehensive impact assessments (economic, financial, and EU legal) for the draft legislation. The position is rather results-oriented, criticizing the minister's hesitation and omissions. Furthermore, interest is expressed in the views of pensioners' organizations concerning the suspension of indexation.

The most prominent issues concern economic forecasts and the impact of the green transition on the economy, where strong criticism has emerged regarding inaccurate forecasts that undermine the institution's credibility. The speaker emphasizes that the green transition is the dominant force in the economy and calls for alternative, context-specific forecasts. Furthermore, the Prime Minister is being asked to provide clarification regarding social comments concerning mandatory childbearing for women, which casts doubt on the government's overall rhetoric.

The political focus is on saving Estonian industry and ensuring energy security. The speaker strongly supports the construction of a nuclear power plant, calling it a survival project. He sharply opposes the "green frenzy" and CO2 taxation, viewing it as the primary cause of industrial collapse. The political framework is strongly results-oriented and values-driven, while warning against radical socialist ideologies.

The political position is strongly opposed to e-voting and mobile voting, viewing them as undermining democracy and the credibility of elections because they facilitate corruption and the buying of votes. He/She also opposes procedural restrictions on the Riigikogu, accusing the government of limiting political freedoms. His/Her views are primarily value-based, focusing on trust and democratic oversight.

The political stance heavily emphasizes ethics and the transparency of government operations, particularly concerning public procurement and conflicts of interest. The speaker sharply criticizes the qualification criteria for the field hospital tender, deeming them unlawful and bizarre. The focus is outcome-oriented and centered on demanding that these suspicions be refuted.

The political position is strongly oppositional, focusing on the procedural and constitutional criticism of the coalition's activities. The main topics are the prioritization of national defense and military mobility, and ensuring the availability of aid directed at victims of domestic violence. Criticism is directed both at values (the twisting of the constitution) and the inefficiency of the government's actions. The speaker sharply criticizes the coalition's lack of effort in implementing the Rules of Procedure Act.

The political position is fiercely oppositional, centered on the government's failed economic model—which relies heavily on tax hikes—and the catastrophic failure of the digital state and data protection. This stance is strongly outcome-driven, highlighting the deepening economic recession and demanding both accountability and resignations. The speaker criticizes the government’s "blind" progression with a plan that has already clearly demonstrated its weaknesses.

The political stance is strongly oppositional, focusing on the government's failures in both foreign policy (violation of the Vienna Convention, disgracing the nation) and the social sector (insufficient child benefits). The speaker demands protection for vulnerable groups (children, people with disabilities) and accuses the government of outright lying. The framing is heavily value- and performance-based, calling for a change in political leadership.

The speaker firmly defends the Estonian nation-state and national sentiment, seeing in the government's actions a clear ideological chasm and a desire to dismantle the Estonian state in the name of building a multicultural dystopia. Strong opposition is directed at the politicization of the prosecutor's office and the inefficiency of the border defense system, emphasizing the need for a rapid and decisive militarized response capability. The political position is intensely value-based and conservatively defensive.

The political stance is strongly anti-government and values-based, accusing the coalition of implementing Marxism and a program that destroys society. Key issues include social conservatism (opposition to gay marriage) and national security, particularly concerning the retention of Ukrainian men of mobilization age in Estonia, which is viewed as a disservice to Ukraine and a threat to Estonia's defense resolve.