By Plenary Sessions: Anti Poolamets

The legislative focus is aimed at ensuring procedural correctness, demanding that all draft legislation be accompanied by the required impact assessments (including the impact of European Union law). Also under scrutiny is the legislation concerning pension indexation, where the speaker is acting more as a seeker of clarification than as an initiator.

The focus is on the quality and methodology of official forecasts and reporting, requiring the preparation of alternative forecasts within the context of the green transition. Direct legislative priorities (draft bills) are not mentioned; instead, the emphasis is placed on the accountability of the government and institutions.

The legislative focus centers on the national survival project—the necessity of constructing a nuclear power plant—and the security arguments associated with it. He/She emphasizes the need for a nationwide effort to locate and thoroughly consider the site of the nuclear power plant. There are no references to specific bills currently under deliberation or any concrete achievements.

The primary legislative focus is on reforming the electoral system, opposing e-voting and proposing regulations for voting procedures in social welfare institutions. Furthermore, it addresses issues related to the Riigikogu's internal procedures, defending the opposition's right to critical debate and to call for recesses.

The legislative focus is currently aimed at controlling and supervising compliance with public procurement laws, especially concerning the legality of the qualification requirements. The speaker is acting in a supervisory capacity, demanding clarification on whether the imposed conditions comply with the law.

The legislative focus is on holding the government accountable and exercising oversight, utilizing interpellations concerning social sector regulations and the budget. It demands that the government comply with the Law on Internal Rules and Procedure regarding the organization of additional sessions. It supports the rapid and thorough implementation of the military mobility measure.

The focus is on criticizing existing draft legislation, particularly the proposed elimination of the tax bulge, which is viewed as blindly moving forward with an inadequate plan. It calls for radical legislative amendments to enhance cyber defense. Furthermore, it supports a substantial increase in the capital requirements for debt collection firms, arguing that €25,000 is too low a threshold to keep out individuals with criminal records.

Legislative attention is centered on opposing government policy, particularly concerning the indexing and funding of social benefits. They are demanding the abolition of the tax hump to protect large families, which points to an interest in amending tax legislation.

The speaker focuses on criticizing existing policy and government actions, as well as opposing current ideological trends. He stresses the need to strengthen border defense (militarized border guard, the capability to demolish bridges) and reform the education policy for refugees to support the preservation of the Ukrainian language, though specific legislative proposals are not mentioned.

The legislative focus is directed at opposing the government's social and defense policies. Concrete legislative action is demanded for the removal of monuments dedicated to the perpetrators of deportations, citing laws that have already been adopted but remain unenforced.