By Plenary Sessions: Siim Pohlak

The main opponents are the governing coalition (the Reform Party, the Social Democrats, and Eesti 200) and the chairman of the Constitutional Committee. The criticism is directed both at the incompetent economic policy, which harms social groups, and at the obstruction of the bill’s proceedings. Opponents are being accused of personal attacks, "mudslinging," and using "doping" (in the form of expense reimbursements), which demonstrates the high intensity of these attacks.

The criticism is aimed at the failure of the previous legislative process, where a similar bill stalled for a "strange reason," despite widespread support. Concerns are being raised that the government has not paid sufficient attention to the issue. The objection is procedural and centers on the lack of action.

The main opponent is the government coalition led by the Reform Party, which is being sharply criticized for its flawed economic policy and unfair tax hikes. The criticism is intense and policy-driven, accusing the government of favoring the wealthier segment and ignoring the suffering of the populace. The government’s justifications for abandoning the planned VAT reduction are being called "pathetic."

The primary groups facing criticism are "liberals" and the ruling system, who are accused of distorting democracy in Estonia and excluding the populace from decision-making. The criticism is intense and ideological, focusing on procedural injustice, specifically that the people only get a voice once every four years.

The main confrontation is directed at the government (the Prime Minister), criticizing the procedural aspects of policy preparation. The criticism is policy- and data-driven, challenging the assertion that all relevant issues, especially those concerning large families, were thoroughly analyzed.

The main opponent is the government coalition, particularly the Reform Party, whose education policy is labeled the "policy of retreat." Criticism is aimed at the avoidance of political responsibility and ineffective measures that facilitate the closure of schools. Regarding climate policy, critics point to its economic consequences and the unfeasibility of its goals.

The main opponents are the Reform Party government and the prime minister, who stand accused of betraying the interests of the people and serving big capital. The criticism leveled against them is both political (concerning tax policy and energy policy) and personal/procedural (highlighting the ignoring of public opinion and cynicism). There is no apparent willingness to compromise with the government; rather, a fundamental change in policy is being demanded.