By Plenary Sessions: Siim Pohlak

The style of cooperation is conditional: the speaker urges that the bill be forwarded and promises to discuss alternative solutions (e.g., faction budgets) in order to find consensus. However, cooperation remains conditional, demanding that the coalition not "mindlessly vote down" the bill and instead engage in a substantive discussion. He emphasizes that the current system is problematic and needs improvement.

The speaker emphasizes previous cross-party support for a similar draft law, noting that during the pre-election period, all parliamentary groups backed it, including the Centre Party. Hope is expressed that this bill does not get stalled again, signaling a desire to achieve broad-based support.

The approach to cooperation centers on backing their own faction's (EKRE) bill and urging governing coalition members to admit their errors and support the VAT reduction. There is no mention of readiness to compromise with the government; rather, they are demanding that the losses be recovered and the policy be altered.

The address is strictly critical and interrogative; there are no references to cooperation, the search for compromise, or cross-party action.

There is not enough data.

It refers to the coalition partner's concern regarding support for the third school stage, which indicates the existence of similar viewpoints on certain issues even within government circles. There is no data on seeking cooperation or compromise, as the speaker focuses on sharply criticizing the government's policy.

The speaker points to the opposition's collaboration, noting that the opposition has proposed a constructive solution for shifting the tax burden onto big capital. Information is lacking regarding any willingness to cooperate with the governing coalition or engage in cross-party dialogue.