By Plenary Sessions: Siim Pohlak

Total Sessions: 7

Fully Profiled: 7

2024-03-20
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The course of action involves active participation in plenary discussions, repeatedly raising questions regarding e-elections, and presenting a draft bill aimed at abolishing the expense allowances for the Riigikogu. The speaker remains persistent, criticizing the bill's two-month delay within the Constitutional Committee and demanding its rapid progression.
2024-03-19
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The pattern of action involves submitting the legislative initiative on behalf of the parliamentary group and actively participating in the presentation of the draft bill to the plenary assembly. The speaker is aware of previous similar legislative attempts and political maneuvers (accelerated procedure before elections).
2024-03-13
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting.
The speaker's pattern of activity is linked to a plenary session of the Riigikogu, where they repeatedly posed questions and delivered a lengthy speech concerning the government's economic policy and the reduction of the value-added tax (VAT). There are no references to activities that occurred outside the Riigikogu or to regular communication patterns.
2024-03-12
15th Riigikogu, 3rd plenary sitting
Only one speech from the plenary session is available, meaning there is insufficient data regarding the patterns of activity.
2024-03-11
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
There is not enough data.
2024-03-05
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The speaker is an active questioner during plenary sessions, addressing both substantive topics and procedural issues (checking time and sound quality). He/She refers to previous warnings that were raised in the chamber as early as last autumn, demonstrating consistency in highlighting certain themes.
2024-03-04
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
All the speeches were delivered during a single plenary session (2024-03-04) in the Questions and Answers round, demonstrating active engagement in holding the government and ministers accountable. This pattern is geared towards direct and intense political confrontation.