By Plenary Sessions: Siim Pohlak

Regarding social issues, emphasis is placed on justice and the protection of societal groups at risk of poverty (large families, pensioners), whom the government has harmed through cuts. He/She also indirectly refers to social justice, wishing that the MPs would feel the impact of the car tax firsthand.

The primary social topic revolves around the accessibility of medication for cancer patients and resolving the shortcomings of the solidarity-based healthcare system. The necessity of ensuring state funding for the purchase of expensive, yet physician-recommended drugs is highlighted.

Regarding social issues, emphasis is placed on economic justice and the criticism surrounding the reduction of benefits for large families, a reduction that was implemented immediately. The primary social concern is the accessibility of essential goods (food, medicine), which have become prohibitively expensive due to tax hikes, forcing the public into strict austerity measures.

Insufficient data.

A strong emphasis on supporting large families (families with four or more children), arguing for their exemption from taxation due to specific transportation needs. This represents a clear focus on family policy and social justice within the realm of taxation.

The main social topic is education policy and the retention of the third school level, the closure of which is considered a result of the state's policy of retreat. The speaker calls for positive measures to preserve educational institutions.

The speaker voices concern and skepticism regarding the government's push for gender neutrality, questioning its scope and implications (e.g., gender-neutral restrooms, shower rooms, and sports competitions). This issue is framed as an ill-conceived policy with unintended consequences.