By Plenary Sessions: Siim Pohlak
Total Sessions: 79
Fully Profiled: 79
2025-09-22
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
There is too little data.
2025-09-04
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
The speaker works closely with the EKRE faction, submitting interpellations on behalf of 13 faction members. Furthermore, they join the protests of other opposition MPs (such as Andrei Korobeinik and Martin Helme), especially concerning the procedural organization of the Finance Committee. This collaboration is aimed at unified resistance to government bills and the violation of procedural norms.
2025-06-04
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker attempts to engage the rapporteur, directly soliciting their opinion, as a practicing expert, on the necessary adjustments that need to be made. This demonstrates a readiness for dialogue and a willingness to utilize expert assessment in policy formulation.
2025-05-21
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
The speaker urges the Social Democrats to admit the failure of the tax increases and support the bill, pointing to the possibility of finding support from the opposition. There are no references to active cooperation or willingness to compromise with the government partners.
2025-05-19
15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
No data available
2025-05-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
Not enough data.
2025-05-07
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
Information regarding the style of cooperation is unavailable, as the statements were framed as critical questions demanding answers about previous political decisions. There is absolutely no indication of seeking compromise or engaging in cross-party collaboration.
2025-05-05
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
Information regarding cooperation or willingness to compromise is lacking. The statements presented are purely questioning and confrontational, calling into doubt both the presenter’s analysis and the minister’s responses.
2025-04-24
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Cooperation is mentioned only at the local government level, highlighting the Kose Municipal Council's decision to say "no" to large-scale wind energy special planning. There is no information regarding cooperation at the Riigikogu (Parliament) level or openness to compromise with developers.
2025-04-21
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Insufficient data.
2025-04-17
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker stresses the need for constructiveness and solution-seeking, directly asking about the coalition’s willingness to cooperate regarding the VAT on food. The query implies that the speaker values constructive collaboration, but feels the coalition is currently failing to provide it.
2025-04-16
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
There is no data regarding cooperation or willingness to compromise.
2025-04-16
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing
There is too little data.
2025-03-24
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session.
Insufficient dataset
2025-03-20
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Not enough data
2025-03-18
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fifth sitting, plenary session
The overall style of collaboration is generally confrontational, but the speaker tentatively welcomes the shift in stance by other parties (the Social Democrats) regarding the immigration issue, referring to it as "something to be welcomed." This suggests a willingness to support others provided they align themselves with the speaker's positions, although direct cooperation is not explicitly mentioned.
2025-03-17
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
There is too little data.
2025-02-25
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
There is too little data.
2025-02-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
There is too little data.
2025-02-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, information briefing
Data unavailable.
2025-01-29
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th sitting, information briefing
There is too little data.
2025-01-22
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session.
No data available
2025-01-22
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing
Cooperation is being sought with the opposition party EKRE by supporting their proposed bill to reduce VAT. Attempts are being made to persuade the minister's party to break away from the ruling coalition and back the opposition's proposal, emphasizing that this is "a very good opportunity."
2025-01-15
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing
Insufficient data.
2025-01-13
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The speeches reveal no openness to compromise or cooperation; rather, the style is purely oppositional and accusatory. The independence and decision-making capacity of the coalition partners (Eesti 200) are being called into question, with speakers referring to them as the Reform Party's "sled ropes."
2024-12-18
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
Not enough data
2024-12-11
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
Information regarding the style of cooperation is unavailable, as the speeches focus on sharp criticism of the government and the coalition. It is mentioned that EKRE has repeatedly put forward proposals of this nature (e.g., cutting administrative costs), which the government is unwilling to hear.
2024-12-04
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting
Data regarding the cooperation style is unavailable because the speech was focused on sharp criticism of and opposition to the government's policies. The party represented by the speaker (EKRE) does not support the tax increase.
2024-12-03
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
Cooperation is being sought with coalition members, appealing to their conscience and calling on them not to support the draft law. There is absolutely no indication of a willingness to compromise with the bill’s initiators or rapporteur, who stand accused of failing to tell the truth.
2024-11-21
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session
No data available.
2024-11-20
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The speaker is demanding statesmanship and substantive cooperation from the government with the opposition in order to take amendments into account and find common ground. The goal is to secure the broadest possible support base in the Riigikogu for this important issue. However, the current tone is confrontational because the level of cooperation is deemed insufficient.
2024-11-12
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
Insufficient data.
2024-11-11
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The style of cooperation is dialogic and constructive, directly posing a question to the presenter regarding the economic foundation of the draft bill. The speaker attempts to understand the viewpoint of the bill's proponent, which suggests an openness to receiving information.
2024-11-07
15th Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session
The speaker supports the draft bill on Rail Baltic presented by the other rapporteur, deeming it necessary, which demonstrates a readiness to cooperate with other opposition forces. He refers to the budget proposals submitted by his party (EKRE), but cooperation with the governing coalition is not mentioned; instead, emphasis is placed on confrontation and the blocking of proposals.
2024-11-06
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The style of cooperation is confrontational, but the speaker urges the rest of the Riigikogu to vote in favor of abolishing the car tax, citing a desire to consolidate opposition to the current bill. There is no information regarding active cooperation or the pursuit of compromises with the coalition partners.
2024-11-05
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session
Lack of data
2024-10-23
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session
No data available
2024-10-22
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
There is insufficient data.
2024-10-21
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The style of cooperation is intra-factional, as the inquiry was submitted on behalf of the signed members of the EKRE faction. There is no evidence of cooperation with other parties or any openness to finding compromises with the government.
2024-10-16
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The speaker is clearly operating within the framework of the opposition faction (EKRE), presenting positions and proposals on the faction's behalf. There are no indications of cooperation with the ruling parties or other factions, and a willingness to compromise is absent.
2024-10-10
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth sitting, plenary session.
No data available
2024-09-16
The 15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting.
There is no evidence of a willingness to cooperate or compromise. The speaker's focus is on critically questioning the government and the rapporteurs, and emphasizing the failure of their activities.
2024-09-11
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session
There is too little data.
2024-09-11
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, press briefing.
The speeches contain no reference whatsoever to cooperation, a willingness to compromise, or cross-party activity, focusing entirely on confronting and criticizing the actions of the government and the prime minister.
2024-07-29
15th Riigikogu, Riigikogu extraordinary session.
No data available
2024-07-29
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
No data available
2024-06-10
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
There is not enough data.
2024-06-05
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The style of engagement is purely oppositional, focusing on representing the interests of the parliamentary group (EKRE) and obstructing the government's activities. Cooperation is observed only internally within the group (such as requesting recesses on the faction's behalf). No willingness to compromise is evident; they demand the complete withdrawal of the draft bill and the termination of the proceedings.
2024-06-03
Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary sitting.
The only thing indicating a cooperative style is the mention of a colleague (Kadastik) as a source of inspiration when the question was asked. There is no information regarding a readiness for compromise or the seeking of broad-based cooperation, since the focus is on the sharp criticism of government policy.
2024-05-29
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
Insufficient data.
2024-05-09
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The speaker shows conditional openness to cooperation, inquiring whether the coalition parties might also be motivated to seek a joint assessment from the Venice Commission. The interest in cooperation is directed toward solving a specific procedural problem by means of an external expert evaluation.
2024-05-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
There is not enough data.
2024-05-07
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The speaker is clearly acting on behalf of the parliamentary group ("on behalf of the EKRE parliamentary group"), demonstrating internal cooperation within their party ranks. Outside the group, efforts are being made to gain support for the proposal concerning the funding of consulates, calling on the entire chamber to vote in favor and lend their support.
2024-05-02
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
Data is scarce.
2024-04-30
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Third Session, Plenary Session.
The style of cooperation is strictly intra-factional, demonstrated by the submission of a proposal in the name of the Conservative People's Party of Estonia (EKRE) to reject the draft bill. There is no evidence of a willingness to compromise or engage in cross-party cooperation.
2024-04-29
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
Data is lacking.
2024-04-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The style of cooperation is evident in the defense of the faction's interests, specifically through requesting recesses for the faction to convene and deliberate. When procedural protests are lodged, similar demands made by other opposition members (Ms. Kõlvart) are also cited, suggesting coordinated intra-opposition activities. There are no indications of a readiness to compromise with the governing parties regarding the issue of e-voting.
2024-04-16
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
There is not enough data.
2024-04-10
15th Estonian Parliament, third sitting, information briefing
Insufficient data.
2024-04-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
Insufficient dataset
2024-03-20
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The style of cooperation is conditional: the speaker urges that the bill be forwarded and promises to discuss alternative solutions (e.g., faction budgets) in order to find consensus. However, cooperation remains conditional, demanding that the coalition not "mindlessly vote down" the bill and instead engage in a substantive discussion. He emphasizes that the current system is problematic and needs improvement.
2024-03-19
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The speaker emphasizes previous cross-party support for a similar draft law, noting that during the pre-election period, all parliamentary groups backed it, including the Centre Party. Hope is expressed that this bill does not get stalled again, signaling a desire to achieve broad-based support.
2024-03-13
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting.
The approach to cooperation centers on backing their own faction's (EKRE) bill and urging governing coalition members to admit their errors and support the VAT reduction. There is no mention of readiness to compromise with the government; rather, they are demanding that the losses be recovered and the policy be altered.
2024-03-12
15th Riigikogu, 3rd plenary sitting
The address is strictly critical and interrogative; there are no references to cooperation, the search for compromise, or cross-party action.
2024-03-11
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
There is not enough data.
2024-03-05
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session
It refers to the coalition partner's concern regarding support for the third school stage, which indicates the existence of similar viewpoints on certain issues even within government circles. There is no data on seeking cooperation or compromise, as the speaker focuses on sharply criticizing the government's policy.
2024-03-04
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The speaker points to the opposition's collaboration, noting that the opposition has proposed a constructive solution for shifting the tax burden onto big capital. Information is lacking regarding any willingness to cooperate with the governing coalition or engage in cross-party dialogue.
2024-02-22
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting
The speaker is engaged in legislative dialogue, addressing the rapporteur to clarify the bill's objective and potential impact. This demonstrates a willingness to support the draft law, which would help resolve local-level corruption issues, thereby seeking solutions through the legislative process.
2024-02-21
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The style of cooperation refers to joint action within the party, mentioning EKRE's previous proposal to reduce VAT. The speaker poses questions to the commission member, seeking confirmation regarding previous discussions. There is no data regarding inter-party cooperation or a willingness to compromise.
2024-02-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The style of cooperation is focused on the unified opposition and protest of the party (EKRE) against what is happening in parliament. Mention is made of collaboration with various interest groups who have reminded the government of the necessity of the automobile. There is no information available regarding inter-party cooperation.
2024-02-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
Insufficient data. The speeches focus solely on questioning and criticizing the government (the prime minister and the minister); there are no references to cooperation with colleagues or other political parties.
2024-02-07
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting.
The speaker is calling for support from all people's representatives to implement an additional tax on banks, though he notes that finding consensus with the Reform Party will be very difficult. He also expresses hope that the Social Democrats will explain their potential decision to withdraw support for the bank tax. There is a low willingness to cooperate with the government coalition, which is seen as representing conflicting interests.
2024-02-05
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting
There is not enough data.
2024-01-24
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
Insufficient data.
2024-01-22
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The speaker continues the topics initiated by other questioners (Mart Maastik, Jaak Valge), which suggests coordinated action within the opposition. There is no evidence of openness to compromise or cooperation with the ruling coalition or other parties.
2024-01-18
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
There is too little data.
2024-01-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The collaborative style is aimed at securing the support of colleagues in legislative work, operating on the assumption that the people's representatives have familiarized themselves with the materials. The politician repeatedly urges a vote in favor of the bills, stressing the shared understanding regarding taxation.
2024-01-16
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
There is not enough data.
2024-01-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
Information is scarce. All the discussion is focused on critically questioning the executive branch (the prime minister).