By Plenary Sessions: Siim Pohlak
Total Sessions: 79
Fully Profiled: 79
2025-09-22
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
The main opponent is the government and the prime minister, who are sharply criticized for procedural shortcomings (lack of communication) and ethical issues (lack of honesty, cowardice). The attacks are intense and direct, accusing the government of keeping members of parliament in an information blackout.
2025-09-04
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
The main opponents are the Reform Party-led government, Prime Minister Kaja Kallas, Finance Minister Jürgen Ligi, and the Riigikogu board/speaker. The criticism is twofold: political (tax increases, economic recession) and procedural (the chaotic work of committees, refusal to grant the floor, and ignoring information from the legal and analysis department). The protests are intense and demand the suspension or return of the processing of the draft legislation, citing "partisanship" when handling procedural issues.
2025-06-04
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The criticism is aimed at the current state of affairs, which places cultural organizers in a difficult position, urgently demanding that improvements be made. The mention of Mr. Ossinovski points instead to a similar vulnerability or political parallel, rather than direct personal confrontation.
2025-05-21
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
The primary opposition is directed at the Reform Party and the ruling coalition, who stand accused of implementing unjust economic policies, habitual lying, and a complete lack of grasp on reality. The criticism is intense, spanning from policy issues (tax hikes) to deeply personal accusations (pro-Russia sentiment, laundering Russian money, and lavish spending at the expense of the affluent). Compromise is strictly ruled out, with demands for the complete and immediate reversal of the tax increases.
2025-05-19
15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
The main opponents are the Reform Party and a minister who is accused of implementing failed globalist policies and experimenting with the Estonian economy. The criticism is intense and policy-driven, accusing the government of repeating the mistakes of Western Europe.
2025-05-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
The confrontation is aimed at the quota setters (the presenter/you), who stand accused of "forcing" people into specific sectors. The criticism focuses on the coercive nature of the policy and its potential expansion to include standard commercial enterprises.
2025-05-07
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The main opponent is the Reform Party, which is sharply criticized for "deceitful conduct" regarding the severing of the link between the fuel excise tax and road maintenance. The criticism targets both the political decisions and the political accountability, demanding to know who the Minister of Finance was at the time.
2025-05-05
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
Strong opposition is aimed at the Reform Party and Eesti 200 government, which is accused of continuously raising taxes (VAT, labor taxes). The criticism is policy-based and intense, rejecting the minister's explanations for the causes of high prices. The speaker faults them for inaction in addressing problems of market concentration.
2025-04-24
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The primary targets of criticism are wind energy developers, who stand accused of aggressively forcing projects onto communities against the will of local residents, driven by high profit expectations. The criticism focuses on their economic motives and unethical conduct (specifically, resorting to legal action with the aid of lawyers). Furthermore, the green transition itself is criticized as a policy that generates economic instability and energy poverty.
2025-04-21
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The opposition is aimed at the e-voting system and those who support its continuation, who are accused of ignoring a security threat. The criticism is intense and politically charged, highlighting the system's lack of trustworthiness and also referencing the Märt Põder case.
2025-04-17
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The main criticism is directed against the governing coalition and its members, accusing them of failing to seek solutions and lacking a positive constructive spirit. The criticism is political and procedural, focusing specifically on the coalition's inaction regarding the Value Added Tax (VAT) issue.
2025-04-16
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The main opponent is the Reform Party, which is facing intense criticism for neglecting energy security and acting as a special representative for Brussels. The criticism is policy-based, centering on poor investment decisions and a narrow focus on wind turbines. No willingness to compromise has been expressed; instead, a fundamental change in direction is being demanded.
2025-04-16
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing
The main criticism is directed at the coalition led by the Reform Party, which is accused of harming large families through the introduction of the car tax and outrageous electricity bills. The criticism is intense and policy-driven, suggesting that the government has set unfair priorities, finding billions for businessmen instead of for families.
2025-03-24
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session.
The confrontation is aimed at the proponents of policies favoring unstable wind energy, who are being criticized for choosing solutions that are both unstable and expensive. The criticism is political and substantive, emphasizing that the opposing side is ignoring viable options for ensuring a permanent and stable electricity supply.
2025-03-20
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The main criticism is aimed at the Reform Party due to the inconsistency of their Russia policy, often singling out Urmas Paet's previous stances. Furthermore, there is intense criticism directed at the rapporteur who is promoting a systemic equality plan, raising doubts about its potential economic impact. The criticism is political in nature but is being delivered with high intensity.
2025-03-18
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fifth sitting, plenary session
The confrontation is aimed at the government as a whole and the coalition partners (Eesti 200, Social Democrats). The criticism is intense, focusing on the failure of the government's economic policy and misplaced priorities, accusing them of damaging business. Compromise is ruled out on the immigration issue, where a zero quota is being demanded.
2025-03-17
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The speaker is clearly in an opposition role, presenting direct questions to "your government" regarding their research and plans. The criticism is policy-based, focusing on the government's inability to research and implement successful demographic policies.
2025-02-25
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The opposition is directed at those who support extending voting rights beyond Estonian citizens, and who are labeled as betrayers of Estonians. The confrontation is intense and ideological, ruling out any compromise on the question of national dignity.
2025-02-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The primary targets of criticism are the Prime Minister and the government, who are being blamed for the lack of a contingency plan and inaction in resolving the electricity price crisis. The criticism is intense and politically motivated, focusing specifically on their failure to anticipate price spikes linked to desynchronization. The speaker supports removing the government via a vote of no confidence.
2025-02-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, information briefing
The main opponent is the Prime Minister and the government, who are being criticized for the lack of an energy plan and for using "smoke and mirrors." The criticism is intense, focusing both on political incompetence and on unfair debate tactics (specifically, attributing false claims).
2025-01-29
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th sitting, information briefing
The standoff is directed at the government's actions or inadequate procedures for vetting recipients of temporary protection. The criticism is policy-based, focusing on the necessity of preventing the misuse of benefits and demanding explanations from the minister regarding how the checks are being implemented.
2025-01-22
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session.
The main opponent is the Reform Party and the governing coalition (Eesti 200, Social Democrats), who are being sharply criticized for their incompetence, ineptitude, and foolish decisions. The criticism targets specific policies (the car tax, uncontrolled spending) as well as the government’s attitude (PR spin, brainwashing). Compromise is ruled out; the objective is to consign the government and its policies to the "dustbin of history."
2025-01-22
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing
The primary adversaries are the Reform Party and the Social Democrats, who are facing criticism for passing the VAT hike. The criticism is intense and policy-focused, accusing the government of actively seeking excuses not to support tax reductions. Finance Minister Jürgen Ligi is mentioned specifically, with predictions that he will compel the coalition partners to bend to his will.
2025-01-15
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing
The main confrontation is directed at the government and the prime minister, who are criticized for poor procedural decisions (the timing of the desynchronization) and for inaction (a non-functioning electricity exchange). The criticism is intense and focuses on demanding accountability, asking who exactly made the decisions.
2025-01-13
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The main opponent is the Reform Party, which is sharply criticized for its incompetent response and the destruction of the energy sector. Criticism is aimed both at their policies (tax hikes, attacking oil shale) and the nature of the government’s actions (dishonesty, shortsightedness). Eesti 200 and the Sotsid are also under attack as cheerleaders of the Reform Party and implementers of submissive policy.
2024-12-18
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The opposition is aimed at the state's planning policy and the minister, criticizing the state's preference for establishing wind farms close to large residential areas. The criticism is policy-driven, repeatedly questioning why the state selects such locations, and suspecting that this causes interference with human health and technical equipment.
2024-12-11
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The primary opposition is the ruling coalition, particularly the Reform Party, which is being accused of labeling critics and employing "fascist logic." The criticism is intense, encompassing both political substance (a poor budget) and unethical behavior (avoiding substantive debate). Compromise regarding the government's budget is ruled out, with calls being made to vote against the budget.
2024-12-04
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting
The main confrontation is directed against the ruling coalition (Reform Party, Estonia 200, Social Democrats), who are accused of blowing holes in the budget, lying, and behaving arrogantly. The Reform Party is considered the primary culprit, harassing entrepreneurs and impoverishing the populace. The criticism is intense and demands the government's collapse, ruling out any possibility of compromise.
2024-12-03
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The primary confrontation is with the governing coalition, especially the Reform Party, which is being accused of initiating dangerous amendments to the Child Protection Act. The criticism is intense, both substantive (concerning the danger posed by the changes) and ethical (involving lying and a lack of conscience). The speaker demands that the bill not be supported for further processing, ruling out any compromise.
2024-11-21
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session
The opponents are those who propagate climate panic and fear-mongering, as well as those who refuse to present specific numerical data regarding the impact of human activity. The criticism is intense, accusing the opposing side of ripping facts out of context and causing damage to both the economy and mental health. No willingness to compromise is being expressed; instead, a complete change of direction is being demanded.
2024-11-20
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The main opponent is the ruling coalition, which is being criticized for playing political games and avoiding the substantive involvement of the opposition. The criticism is intense, accusing the government of lacking statesmanship and compromising national dignity. The government's actions are described as "steamrolling ahead."
2024-11-12
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The primary confrontation is directed at Kaja Kallas's government and the subsequent continuation government, who are criticized for mismanaging priorities and wasting taxpayer money. The criticism is intense and addresses both the inefficiency of the government’s operations and the inaccuracy of the facts presented, particularly concerning the forecasts for cost reduction.
2024-11-11
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The speaker makes an indirect reference to "critics" who have previously opposed the addition of public holidays, citing potential economic losses. No direct confrontation with the presenter or other political groups is voiced; rather, the critics' stance serves as background context for the question being posed.
2024-11-07
15th Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session
The primary adversary is the ruling coalition, which is being criticized both for procedural obstruction and for the failure of the Rail Baltic project. The criticism is intense, accusing the coalition of avoiding discussion, as EKRE’s proposals were shot down in the Finance Committee specifically to prevent them from reaching the plenary session. The speaker suspects that personal profit expectations are behind the effort to keep the project alive.
2024-11-06
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The main opponents are the parties of the ruling coalition: the Reform Party, the Social Democrats, and Eesti 200. The criticism is aimed both at the policy itself (the unfairness and inefficiency of the car tax) and the procedure, accusing the opposing side of suppressing debate and avoiding public discussion. The speaker accuses the governing parties of indifference toward rural residents and rural life.
2024-11-05
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session
There is no direct opposition, but criticism is aimed at the government’s inaction or its insufficient overview regarding the movement of migrant masses. The emphasis is placed on the necessity of improving policy and effectiveness, with specific requests for the minister to provide concrete plans.
2024-10-23
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session
The main opponent is the ruling coalition, specifically the Reform Party and Kaja Kallas's governments, who are accused of destroying the economy and abusing power. The criticism is intense and focuses on political failures and ethical questions (including the failure to listen to businesses and entrepreneurs). There is no readiness for compromise, as the demand is that the government must admit its actions were unjustified.
2024-10-22
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The primary opponents are those against the bank tax, who are accused of generating panic and establishing a negative public atmosphere. The Reform Party is also criticized for its contradictory regulatory philosophy, under which the government supposedly can save the climate but is unable to influence the economy. The criticism is based on policy and philosophy.
2024-10-21
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The primary opposition is aimed squarely at the government led by Kaja Kallas and the Reform Party, who stand accused of plunging the state budget into a billion-euro deficit and overseeing a complete failure of economic policy. The criticism is intense, targeting both political incompetence and the lack of transparency within the Ministry of Finance (specifically, the classification of documents). There is no expression of a willingness to compromise; instead, they are demanding an evaluation of the government's performance.
2024-10-16
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The main opponents are the government led by the Reform Party and its coalition partners (the Social Democrats, Eesti 200), who stand accused of "arrogant governance" and a three-year failure. The criticism is intense and widespread, encompassing both political injustice (favoring large banks) and procedural lack of transparency. Compromise is ruled out, a fact confirmed by the proposal submitted on behalf of the faction of the Conservative People's Party of Estonia to reject the draft budget.
2024-10-10
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth sitting, plenary session.
The main confrontation is directed at the government and the ruling coalition, who are being criticized for the substance of the draft bill and its perceived immorality. The attacks are intense, focusing on the irrationality of the policy and demanding an explanation as to why they wish to allow such a thing. There is no willingness to compromise, as this is considered a morally unacceptable issue.
2024-09-16
The 15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting.
The main opponents are the Reform Party and the Social Democrats. The Reform Party is accused of pursuing "steamroller" politics and adopting a neo-communist approach, while the Social Democrats are criticized for failing to stand up for their voters and essentially being held hostage. The criticism is intense and centers on the results of the government’s performance.
2024-09-11
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session
The confrontation manifests as criticism of the Reform Party, bringing up their earlier wish to introduce visa-free travel with Russia, which points to a historical deficit in security policy. Nevertheless, the main interaction is limited to requesting information from the minister and the rapporteur.
2024-09-11
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, press briefing.
The main opponent is the Reform Party and the government it leads, which is accused of continuing Kaja Kallas's failed economic policy. The criticism is intense and multi-layered, covering both political failure (the recession) and dishonest behavior (attributing false claims to the questioner). No willingness to compromise is expressed; instead, the dangerous nature of the government's actions is emphasized.
2024-07-29
15th Riigikogu, Riigikogu extraordinary session.
The primary confrontation is aimed squarely at the Reform Party, which is being sharply criticized for political labeling, specifically for attempting to "stamp the Kremlin mark on people's foreheads." The opposition is intense and focuses on the party's political conduct and its methods of exerting pressure on members of the government.
2024-07-29
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
The primary opponent is the Reform Party and the government, who stand accused of deliberately lying about taxes and driving the nation's finances into crisis purely for the sake of winning the election. The criticism is intense and highly political, labeling the government's actions a "brutal experiment" conducted on the Estonian people. Any compromise regarding tax hikes is ruled out, with calls being made to vote against them.
2024-06-10
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The main opponent is the government and the prime minister, who are sharply criticized for favoring large banks and for a tax policy that is impoverishing the Estonian people. The criticism is policy- and procedure-based, questioning specific agreements (the payout of dividends before the income tax hike) and the underlying considerations. The opposition is intense, and no willingness to compromise has been expressed; instead, they are demanding answers and justice.
2024-06-05
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The main opponent is the ruling government coalition, especially the Reform Party, which is accused of plunging the state budget into deficit and pursuing an ill-conceived tax policy. The criticism is intense, covering both substantive aspects (destruction of the economy, wealth tax) and procedural aspects (irregularity in the legislative process). The speaker demands the withdrawal of the car tax bill and accuses the government of ignoring the public's ability to cope financially.
2024-06-03
Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary sitting.
The main opponents are the Minister of Economic Affairs, who is accused of inaction and lacking a concrete plan, and the Prime Minister, who is criticized for creating economy-damaging hysteria. The speaker also criticizes the Reform Party for supporting the censorship law. The criticism is intense, addressing both policy and the government’s tactics, which are referred to as "political pornography."
2024-05-29
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The main opponent is the Reform Party government and its representatives (including Jürgen Ligi), who are accused of a "tax hike spree" and favoring large corporations. The criticism is intense, focusing both on political decisions (tax increases, privatization) and procedural shortcomings (the swift removal of interest groups from the committee). The government is being called the special representative of large corporations.
2024-05-09
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The primary criticism is aimed at the governing coalition, particularly the Reform Party, which is accused of ignoring issues related to e-elections and suppressing parallels drawn with Russia. The criticism is both intense and procedural, implying that the government fails to recognize a problem that is clearly evident.
2024-05-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The speaker is in strong opposition to the Reform Party government, forcefully criticizing their omnibus tax increases and fiscal policy as unacceptable to the majority of Estonians. The criticism targets both the political decisions and the prime minister's conduct, accusing her of having a victim mentality and demanding that the decisions be reversed.
2024-05-07
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
There are no direct opponents, but the repeated demands for a vote indicate procedural opposition or obstacles that the speaker is attempting to overcome. The criticism is procedural in nature, rather than politically substantive or personal.
2024-05-02
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The primary criticism is levelled against the government and the coalition, who stand accused of 'harboring a desire for a soft dictatorship' and implementing dangerous taxation logic. The criticism is both intense and philosophical, addressing the fundamental nature and goals of the government's activities, not merely the content of the policy itself.
2024-04-30
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Third Session, Plenary Session.
The primary adversary is the government, particularly the Reform Party, who they accuse of driving the Estonian economy into a black hole and mismanaging the state. The criticism is intense, focusing on both political injustice (tax hikes) and ethical brutality (the targeting of pensioners and large families). Compromise has been ruled out, with demands for the bill to be rejected.
2024-04-29
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The primary criticism is directed at the government and the Prime Minister, focusing on the inefficiency of political decisions (tax hikes) and procedures (public engagement). The speaker demands concrete positive outcomes from the engagement process, suggesting it is meaningless if no results are produced.
2024-04-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The main opponents are the Reform Party and the government, who stand accused of maintaining power through e-elections and undermining public trust in democracy. The criticism is intense, encompassing both political accusations and challenges to procedural rules, specifically accusing the board of exceeding its mandate. The speaker draws a controversial parallel between Estonia and Russia, noting that both countries make extensive use of internet voting.
2024-04-16
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
Direct criticism is aimed at the minister, whose speech failed to present concrete plans for protecting the national culture and engaging young people. The conceptual adversaries are defined as external forces: large nations, major languages, and mass culture, which exert significant pressure on the culture expressed in the national language.
2024-04-10
15th Estonian Parliament, third sitting, information briefing
The opposition is directed at the government's fiscal policy, particularly the minister's plan to abolish the tax hump, which has been presented as an irresponsible expenditure. The criticism is political, focusing on budget deficits and the necessity of introducing new taxes.
2024-04-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The opposition is aimed at the Estonian government and associated individuals, who are being criticized for using negative tones when commenting on Hungary's internal affairs. The criticism is intense and centers on the unreasonableness and disrespect shown by the government's foreign policy conduct.
2024-03-20
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The main opponents are the governing coalition (the Reform Party, the Social Democrats, and Eesti 200) and the chairman of the Constitutional Committee. The criticism is directed both at the incompetent economic policy, which harms social groups, and at the obstruction of the bill’s proceedings. Opponents are being accused of personal attacks, "mudslinging," and using "doping" (in the form of expense reimbursements), which demonstrates the high intensity of these attacks.
2024-03-19
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The criticism is aimed at the failure of the previous legislative process, where a similar bill stalled for a "strange reason," despite widespread support. Concerns are being raised that the government has not paid sufficient attention to the issue. The objection is procedural and centers on the lack of action.
2024-03-13
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting.
The main opponent is the government coalition led by the Reform Party, which is being sharply criticized for its flawed economic policy and unfair tax hikes. The criticism is intense and policy-driven, accusing the government of favoring the wealthier segment and ignoring the suffering of the populace. The government’s justifications for abandoning the planned VAT reduction are being called "pathetic."
2024-03-12
15th Riigikogu, 3rd plenary sitting
The primary groups facing criticism are "liberals" and the ruling system, who are accused of distorting democracy in Estonia and excluding the populace from decision-making. The criticism is intense and ideological, focusing on procedural injustice, specifically that the people only get a voice once every four years.
2024-03-11
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
The main confrontation is directed at the government (the Prime Minister), criticizing the procedural aspects of policy preparation. The criticism is policy- and data-driven, challenging the assertion that all relevant issues, especially those concerning large families, were thoroughly analyzed.
2024-03-05
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The main opponent is the government coalition, particularly the Reform Party, whose education policy is labeled the "policy of retreat." Criticism is aimed at the avoidance of political responsibility and ineffective measures that facilitate the closure of schools. Regarding climate policy, critics point to its economic consequences and the unfeasibility of its goals.
2024-03-04
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The main opponents are the Reform Party government and the prime minister, who stand accused of betraying the interests of the people and serving big capital. The criticism leveled against them is both political (concerning tax policy and energy policy) and personal/procedural (highlighting the ignoring of public opinion and cynicism). There is no apparent willingness to compromise with the government; rather, a fundamental change in policy is being demanded.
2024-02-22
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting
The opposition is aimed at local businessmen who profit from municipal assets, and the local government which sells property for next to nothing. The criticism is intense and focuses on a pattern of corrupt behavior and political deception, where the formation of electoral alliances is used to try and conceal the same old players. The criticism targets ethical and procedural violations.
2024-02-21
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The confrontation is aimed at the policies of the "liberals," who are criticized for basing their decisions on European models while completely ignoring Estonian purchasing power and wage levels. The criticism is also leveled at the government’s fiscal priorities, which favor foreign aid over ensuring domestic financial stability.
2024-02-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The main opponents are the government and the Reform Party, especially Kaja Kallas and Mart Võrklaev, who are accused of starting with a lie and running the budget into the ground. The criticism is intense, focusing both on the government’s dishonesty and the violation of parliamentary practices through the restriction of opposition rights. A compromise regarding the car tax is completely ruled out.
2024-02-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
Strong opposition is aimed at the policies of the Prime Minister and the government, particularly concerning taxation and budgetary decisions. The criticism is rooted in policy and philosophy, accusing the government of favoring foreign big capital over the Estonian people and protecting banks. There is no sign of a willingness to compromise; instead, opponents are demanding a clear justification for the government's logic and choices.
2024-02-07
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting.
The main opponents are the ruling coalition, especially the Reform Party, which is accused of serving the interests of foreign major banks and squeezing every last cent out of the Estonian people. The criticism is intense, focusing on unfair tax policy choices and the deliberate stalling of the draft legislation. The government's communication strategy is accused of creating an atmosphere of fear ("Estonia is at war!"), which ultimately scares off investments.
2024-02-05
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting
The main criticism is directed against the Government of the Republic, which is accused of failing to resolve the situation where service workers in the capital do not speak Estonian. The criticism is based on policy and performance, demanding concrete steps from the government to put an end to the situation.
2024-01-24
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
Insufficient data.
2024-01-22
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The primary conflict is aimed at the government and its ministers, particularly concerning fiscal and infrastructure policy. The criticism is policy-based (unfair taxation, changes to the Rail Baltic project) and procedural (calling Eurostat data into question). The speaker expresses deep dissatisfaction, accusing the government of avarice and hypocrisy regarding environmental protection.
2024-01-18
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The opposition is directed at the government’s education policy, particularly the plan to consolidate the school network, which is widely considered short-sighted. The criticism is political, focusing on the government’s failure to adopt a long-term regional policy perspective and offer solutions that would encourage population settlement and distribution.
2024-01-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
There is no direct confrontation, but the first statement includes criticism regarding the inadequacy of state procedures and the uncertainty in identifying responsibility during package inspection. The criticism is procedural and focuses on risks arising from negligence.
2024-01-16
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The primary targets of criticism are state institutions that have refused to take on an oversight role over the prosecutor's office, including the Supreme Court and the Ministry of Justice. The criticism is aimed at the institutions' inaction and their reluctance to resolve systemic issues concerning citizens' rights.
2024-01-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
The opposition stance is directed against the governments led by the Reform Party, criticizing them for shortcomings in family policy and a lack of control over the costs associated with Rail Baltic. The Prime Minister is accused of avoiding necessary political action and making overly emotional statements that generate uncertainty among young people.