By Plenary Sessions: Mart Maastik

The text refers to a colleague (Igor Taro), posing a similar question to him, which indicates a degree of cooperation among like-minded colleagues. There is no information regarding a broader willingness to compromise or cross-party cooperation, given that a confrontational tone dominates towards those directing policy.

The speaker is unwilling to compromise on the fundamental principles of the constitution, viewing such compromises as a betrayal of conscience. He criticizes the coalition’s substantial consensus (87 deputies) as a political maneuver and questions why no attempt is being made to find common ground with the "other side" (the opposition), who, he claims, are not merely chasing votes.

Not enough data.

The speaker stresses the importance of finding common ground with opposition parties (the Center Party, EKRE) regarding the criticism of economic policy, noting that this commonality is crucial. Furthermore, the need to listen to and take into account the views of business organizations and opposition politicians is highlighted.

The speaker primarily addresses the opposition MPs, noting the coalition members' low level of interest in the debate. The style is confrontational toward the government, and there is no indication of a willingness to compromise on budget or tax policy.

Not enough data

The speaker seconds colleague Helle-Moonika Helme's question and refers to the comments made by another colleague (Andres Metsoja) on the topic of costs. The cooperation style is geared towards internal factional activity, proposing that the draft bill be returned to the committee through the faction chairman.

There is too little data.

Insufficient data.

Insufficient data.

Insufficient Data

Demonstrates a willingness to recognize good legislative proposals, commending one specific bill (on the subject of maritime safety) as "very reasonable." He/She also noted his agreement with the previous speakers' remarks concerning regional policy.