By Plenary Sessions: Mart Maastik

The legislative focus is centered on opposing the current climate policy and its financing mechanisms (CO2 quotas). Criticism is directed both at how the CO2 quota revenue is utilized (e.g., Rail Baltic) and at the establishment of green energy projects (such as offshore wind farms), drawing attention to their hidden environmental harm.

The main legislative priorities are centered on opposing constitutional amendments (namely, restricting suffrage only to citizens) and criticizing the administrative reform. He/She is a strong opponent of bills related to the reorganization of ministries and changes to the qualification requirements for officials, considering these proposals unreasonable and chaotic.

The legislative focus centers on the draft bill for the establishment of the Land and Space Agency. The speaker is a critical opponent of the proposed amendments concerning the repeal of specific sections of the Planning Act. The priority is to ensure ministerial oversight and the mandatory obligation for public consultation (or the hearing of citizens) during the planning procedure.

The legislative focus is aimed at opposing existing regulations (such as the ban on stopping for commercial transport) and planned taxes/fees (packaging tax, waste charge). Emphasis is placed on the necessity of thorough debate before the implementation of major energy projects (offshore wind farms), and the passing of laws without taking reasonable arguments into account is criticized.

The legislative focus is the state budget, which the speaker strongly opposes and refuses to support. Criticism is directed at the budget's procedural format (activity-based) and its content (tax hikes, unreasonable energy investments). The speaker advocates returning to a cost-based budget and cutting state expenditures.

The focus is on the clarity of the Riigikogu's internal organization and procedural rules, particularly the mechanism for submitting questions. Specific bills or achievements are not mentioned; rather, the interest lies in the legal correctness of the procedure.

The legislative focus is currently on opposing the draft bill concerning the reorganization of the Land Board (Maa-amet). The speaker, acting in the role of the opposition, is proposing a more logical administrative structure—specifically placing land, spatial planning, and geology under the Ministry of Regional Affairs and Agriculture—and moving to send the draft bill back to the committee.

There is too little data.

The legislative focus is centered on the procedural correctness of decisions made within the committees. The speaker opposes the adopted decision because it was made without debating crucial aspects and in violation of good parliamentary practice.

The legislative focus centers on demanding the review of existing government development plans (especially those concerning the Saaremaa and Hiiumaa offshore wind farms), taking into account international changes (the election of Trump). There is no information regarding the initiation or support of specific legislative bills.

The legislative focus is aimed at opposing the government’s tax policy (the motor vehicle tax) and infrastructure investments (roads, ferries). Also crucial is monitoring the implementation of bureaucracy reduction directives (ELAK) and demanding concrete examples related to their fulfillment.

The speaker primarily operates as a critic of the regional consequences stemming from government policy. He supports the current maritime safety bill but is using the topic as a platform to raise broader questions concerning excise policy.