By Plenary Sessions: Mart Maastik
Total Sessions: 134
Fully Profiled: 134
2025-10-15
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Information Hour
Insufficient data
2025-10-14
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The collaborative approach centers on external partnerships, offering strong support for the proposals put forth by the Association of Estonian Cities and Municipalities regarding the expansion of supervisory rights for local governments. The speaker is acting on behalf of the Isamaa party, promising to introduce amendments, which signals a readiness for parliamentary group activity.
2025-10-08
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
There is no information regarding cooperation with colleagues or readiness for compromise, as the statements presented consist purely of critical questions directed at the government.
2025-10-08
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Information Hour
Insufficient data.
2025-10-07
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
No data available.
2025-10-06
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
There is not enough data.
2025-09-24
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.
The speaker strongly advocates for joint and coordinated action at the ministerial level among the three Baltic states (Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania) so that they can approach the European Union with a unified position. He/She stresses that acting separately will lead to fines and unfavorable outcomes, and calls for seeking like-minded partners among neighboring countries. Cooperation is viewed as the only way to achieve a sensible solution.
2025-09-23
15th Riigikogu, 6th session, plenary session
Data is scarce.
2025-09-17
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, press briefing.
Not enough data.
2025-09-16
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.
This indicates internal cooperation and preparation within the faction, as evidenced by the mention of the Isamaa faction meeting with the rapporteur in June. However, data on broader cross-party cooperation or readiness for compromise is lacking.
2025-09-10
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
No data available
2025-09-09
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session.
There is insufficient data.
2025-09-04
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
The representative demonstrates strong cooperation within the faction, having co-signed several interpellations alongside Helir-Valdor Seeder, Riina Solman, and others. He/She is open to procedural cooperation—for instance, offering to provide a missing signature in support of a draft bill—but insists on a serious discussion with the coalition.
2025-06-18
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing
Data is insufficient. The speaker's focus is entirely on criticizing and opposing the government.
2025-06-16
XV Riigikogu, V Session, Plenary Sitting
The speaker positively notes a rare instance of cooperation, where the governing coalition backed the reasonable proposal from the Isamaa faction (the postponement of ESG). This shows a pragmatic willingness to cooperate when it serves the goal of reducing bureaucracy. Nevertheless, the speaker remains predominantly skeptical of the government's policies.
2025-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The cooperation takes place within the framework of the Isamaa Party, referencing the proposals the party has put forward (e.g., the 300 million cut proposal). He/She also refers to the amendments proposed by the Bar Association, which resulted in a compromise solution. On a personal level, he/she is willing to grant a colleague's request to speak briefly.
2025-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing.
The cooperative style is evident in the continuation of the colleague's (Urmas Reinsalu) question, which points to the coordinated presentation of topics and concerns among the faction or politicians who share similar views. This demonstrates internal cooperation in keeping these issues on the agenda.
2025-06-04
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker is open to cooperation, noting that two other political parties have also put forward similar proposals, and requests support from all parties ("regardless of which party you belong to"). Reference is also made to the consensus within the Tallinn ruling coalition regarding the need to regulate this sector, which demonstrates a readiness for broad-based support.
2025-06-03
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fifth session, plenary session
Insufficient data.
2025-06-02
15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session
Insufficient data.
2025-05-21
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
Although the speaker represents the opposition (Isamaa) and criticizes the government, he calls on everyone to forget partisan squabbles and vote in favor of Isamaa's draft bill, stressing that the outcome and finding consensus are what truly matter. He demonstrates a willingness to cooperate, provided that such cooperation leads to a reduction in bureaucracy.
2025-05-15
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Data regarding willingness to cooperate or compromise with other political forces is lacking, as the speeches focus on directly challenging the minister. The pattern of activity rather points toward an oppositional oversight function.
2025-05-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
Cooperates with the opposition, praising Rain Epler (EKRE) for a good and intelligent overview, and supporting EKRE's bill to request the abandonment of CO2 quotas. Initiates the formation of a Parliamentary investigative committee to scrutinize the actions of the executive branch. Shows no openness to compromise with the coalition.
2025-05-14
15th Riigikogu, fifth sitting, information briefing.
The speaker refers to the second half of the question posed by their benchmate, which demonstrates coordinated action within their political group. They invite the Prime Minister to visit the Saaremaa sheep collective, offering the "good wisdom" gained there for improving state governance, which constitutes a potential offer for practical cooperation.
2025-05-07
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
Data is scarce.
2025-05-07
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, information briefing
Cooperation is demonstrated with local governments, referencing the appeal of the Hiiumaa Municipal Council and using it to support their arguments. This shows a readiness to work with regional stakeholders. Data regarding other inter-party cooperation is unavailable.
2025-05-06
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Insufficient data
2025-04-16
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker sharply criticized the coalition for automatically rejecting the opposition’s ideas, but urged a more statesmanlike and cross-party approach. He proposed that the Economic Affairs Committee informally discuss issues vital to the state in order to find the "golden mean." He acknowledged that Isamaa’s earlier decisions (for example, concerning Estonian-language education) were the result of a compromise with the Social Democrats, which in turn required making concessions in the energy sector.
2025-04-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The style of cooperation is formal, initially offering Minister Sutt a polite but ironic compliment. Cooperation with wind energy developers is noted; they have contacted the speaker to express their opposition to the subsidies. There is no data available regarding inter-party legislative cooperation.
2025-04-09
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker is actively participating in the plenary debate, asking questions and proposing alternative solutions (specifically, directing funds to the state treasury). There is no information regarding their willingness to cooperate or compromise with other political factions.
2025-04-09
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, information briefing
Insufficient data.
2025-04-08
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The style of cooperation is partisan, with the Isamaa Party faction submitting a proposal in its name to reject the draft bill. The proposal was signed by faction chairman Helir-Valdor Seeder, which demonstrates unified intra-faction opposition.
2025-03-26
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing
There is not enough data.
2025-03-24
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session.
The style of cooperation is highly debate-driven and confrontational, involving direct argumentative rounds with a colleague from the Economic Committee. Although the speaker addresses colleagues politely, there is no indication of a willingness to compromise or engage in cross-party cooperation on fundamental issues of energy policy.
2025-03-19
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing.
There is insufficient data regarding cooperation or willingness to compromise.
2025-03-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Insufficient data.
2025-03-10
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker is calling for the formation of an investigative commission to determine the truth and identify those responsible, appealing for the support of "all reasonable people," scientists, and entrepreneurs. He emphasizes that the investigation must concern all governments, not just the current coalition. Direct cooperation with the opposing side was not mentioned; instead, the demand is that they take responsibility.
2025-02-26
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The style of collaboration is respectful and information-seeking, addressing the server politely ("Dear server!") and posing a relevant question that signals a readiness for dialogue.
2025-02-26
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, press briefing
No data available.
2025-02-25
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The style of cooperation is pragmatic and goal-oriented, as the speaker specifically proposes a mathematical coalition of four parties (EKRE, Isamaa, Reformierakond, and Eesti 200) in order to achieve a constitutional amendment. This demonstrates a willingness for cross-party cooperation in the national interest.
2025-02-20
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session.
The speaker operates as a representative of the opposition but commends coalition MP Tanel Tein for initiating the discussion. Former Olympic athletes (Šmigun-Vähi, Jaanson) and Hanno Pevkur are also praised for showing backbone by voting against the cut to sports funding, although the speaker notes that they should have been even more steadfast. No direct offer of cooperation is presented to the coalition; instead, a change in policy is demanded.
2025-02-19
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary sitting
There is too little data.
2025-02-19
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th sitting, information briefing
The speaker refers to their colleague Aivar Kokk, supporting his earlier position regarding the development of the energy sector, which demonstrates internal cooperation within the faction. There is no information concerning cooperation with the governing parties or any readiness to compromise.
2025-02-17
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
There isn't enough data. The speaker's position is clearly oppositional and challenging, not geared toward cooperation.
2025-02-13
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary meeting
It refers to the unified stance of the party (Isamaa) and positively mentions its neighbor. It demonstrates openness to various energy types, provided they are supported by the market situation, but there are no direct references to cross-party cooperation.
2025-02-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker uses data obtained from the Ministry of Climate, which points to cooperation with state institutions in gathering information. Additionally, he refers to a supportive remark by his colleague (Helir-Valdor Seeder), which shows the existence of support within the faction or the party.
2025-02-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
Not enough data
2025-02-10
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
Not enough data
2025-01-29
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The speaker supports the Chancellor of Justice's proposal for resolving the Iru case but adds a stipulation regarding the need to review the methodology for subsidies. He/She also agrees with the views of the previous speaker, Aleksandr Tšaplõgin, concerning the impact of renewable energy fees in creating unhealthy competition.
2025-01-27
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Insufficient data.
2025-01-22
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session.
The collaborative style is dialogical, involving asking the rapporteur and colleagues specific and pointed questions. The goal is to obtain clarifications and highlight the tax's deficiencies, not to seek a compromise regarding the tax itself.
2025-01-22
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing
The speaker expands upon a colleague's question concerning offshore wind farms, demonstrating cooperation within the faction. There is no information available regarding cooperation with the government or other political parties.
2025-01-21
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
The speaker refers to a colleague’s (Karmen Joller) previous stance regarding the scarcity of funds, utilizing it to support their argument. There is no direct indication of a willingness to cooperate with the government on this issue; rather, it involves posing a challenging question to the government representative.
2025-01-20
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker acknowledges the contributions of other colleagues and quotes Helir-Valdor Seeder, demonstrating cooperation with colleagues who share a similar value framework. A willingness is expressed to consider alternative solutions for solving the birth rate problem, should they be proposed, but it is emphasized that action must be taken.
2025-01-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The style of cooperation is formal and conditional; while agreement is expressed regarding the objectives of the draft legislation, issues requiring immediate amendment are subsequently raised. This cooperation is aimed at improving the quality of legislation through critical analysis, necessitating a broader and more systematic approach.
2024-12-19
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
Insufficient data.
2024-12-18
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The speaker refers to colleagues' positions to support their arguments regarding the overproduction and lack of planning for onshore wind farms. Towards the coalition, however, the style is oppositional, highlighting the hypocritical attitude of coalition members concerning the cost of cabling high-voltage lines in Harju County versus Saare County.
2024-12-18
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, press briefing
The speaker mentions cooperating with a colleague ("I'm going to help Lauri out a bit"), which points to a supportive relationship within their political faction. There is no evidence of cross-party compromise or cooperation.
2024-12-17
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The style of cooperation relies heavily on the proposals put forward by business organizations (such as the Chamber of Commerce and Industry) and professional associations (such as the Chamber of Auditors), utilizing these proposals to validate its own standpoints. The speaker is collaborating with fellow faction member Evelin Poolamets and is speaking on behalf of Isamaa, but highlights the failure to achieve a compromise with the ministry.
2024-12-12
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The speaker is participating in an active debate, referencing the positions of colleagues (Seeder, Laats) and stressing the avoidance of categorization (left-, right-, or center-populism). He supports sending the Centre Party's draft bill forward to the second reading, demonstrating a willingness for procedural cooperation in continuing the discussion.
2024-12-11
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The speaker emphasizes cooperation with the Chamber of Commerce and Industry (representing entrepreneurs) and the Estonian Chamber of Auditors, praising the latter for its readiness to compromise (the raising of the 25% + 20% limits). He confirms complete intra-factional (Isamaa) unity regarding his positions, but criticizes the government side for its lack of willingness to compromise.
2024-12-11
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth session, press briefing.
Insufficient data.
2024-12-10
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
Data indicating a cooperative style is absent; the speaker acts as a critical interrogator, calling into question both the content of the draft bill and the work of other deputies. There is no reference to seeking compromises or cross-party cooperation.
2024-12-09
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary sitting
Not enough data
2024-12-04
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, press briefing
There is no information regarding cooperation with the government; instead, the situation is characterized by sharp confrontation. The earlier question raised by a colleague (Andres Metsoja) on the same topic is noted, which suggests a certain level of information exchange and coordination with other opposition members.
2024-12-03
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The style of cooperation is direct and dialogic, addressing a specific colleague ("Dear Eero!") by name and attempting to identify a shared concern. The speaker stresses that this is a common problem ("for the sake of our children and yours as well"), which indicates a desire to find a cross-party solution.
2024-12-02
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The speaker supports the idea put forward by other parties regarding state regulation of the windfall profits banks have made thanks to Euribor, demonstrating openness on specific issues. However, he/she stresses that the government is listening neither to businesses nor the opposition, which points to a current lack of cooperation with the government.
2024-11-21
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session
The text refers to a colleague (Igor Taro), posing a similar question to him, which indicates a degree of cooperation among like-minded colleagues. There is no information regarding a broader willingness to compromise or cross-party cooperation, given that a confrontational tone dominates towards those directing policy.
2024-11-20
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The speaker is unwilling to compromise on the fundamental principles of the constitution, viewing such compromises as a betrayal of conscience. He criticizes the coalition’s substantial consensus (87 deputies) as a political maneuver and questions why no attempt is being made to find common ground with the "other side" (the opposition), who, he claims, are not merely chasing votes.
2024-11-19
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session.
Not enough data.
2024-11-18
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth Session, Plenary Session
The speaker stresses the importance of finding common ground with opposition parties (the Center Party, EKRE) regarding the criticism of economic policy, noting that this commonality is crucial. Furthermore, the need to listen to and take into account the views of business organizations and opposition politicians is highlighted.
2024-11-13
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session.
The speaker primarily addresses the opposition MPs, noting the coalition members' low level of interest in the debate. The style is confrontational toward the government, and there is no indication of a willingness to compromise on budget or tax policy.
2024-11-13
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, information briefing
Not enough data
2024-11-12
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The speaker seconds colleague Helle-Moonika Helme's question and refers to the comments made by another colleague (Andres Metsoja) on the topic of costs. The cooperation style is geared towards internal factional activity, proposing that the draft bill be returned to the committee through the faction chairman.
2024-11-11
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
There is too little data.
2024-11-06
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
Insufficient data.
2024-11-06
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, information briefing
Insufficient data.
2024-11-05
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session
Insufficient Data
2024-11-04
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
Demonstrates a willingness to recognize good legislative proposals, commending one specific bill (on the subject of maritime safety) as "very reasonable." He/She also noted his agreement with the previous speakers' remarks concerning regional policy.
2024-10-17
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary sitting
The speaker is seeking broad support, urging all colleagues to vote in favor of the bill, irrespective of the factions' prior decisions. He/She supportively references the earlier positions of other colleagues (e.g., Grünthal, Jaanson, Vooglaid) who have backed a similar principle of justice, thereby demonstrating an openness to sharing ideas across party lines.
2024-10-16
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
There is not enough data.
2024-10-16
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, press briefing
The speaker proposes a cooperation mechanism with local municipalities, intending to direct the ferry operator's profit toward them for tourism development. This demonstrates a readiness to support local governments, provided the state modifies the terms of the next procurement competition.
2024-10-15
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session
It references colleague Andres Metsoja’s position regarding the rise of input prices, which demonstrates collaboration with like-minded colleagues concerning economic criticism. Otherwise, it focuses on direct and confrontational communication with the minister.
2024-10-14
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting
The speaker refers to Rain Epler's previously posed question regarding the sense of security, which demonstrates an awareness of colleagues' concerns and common ground on certain topics. Direct cooperation, willingness to compromise, or cross-party activity was not mentioned.
2024-10-09
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, information briefing
Data is scarce.
2024-09-18
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session
The speaker references the arguments made by other colleagues (Kalle Grünthal, Lauri Laats, Andres Metsoja, Mario Kadastik), utilizing them to bolster their own opposition. This demonstrates engagement in the debate and an acknowledgement of other viewpoints. However, no willingness to compromise is expressed, as the party Isamaa has announced its firm decision not to support the draft bill.
2024-09-18
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, press briefing
The speaker refers to the previous cooperation between Isamaa and the Centre Party in establishing the linear income tax exemption. The current speech lacks any references to seeking compromises with the governing coalition, maintaining a strictly oppositional stance.
2024-09-16
The 15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting.
Insufficient data.
2024-07-29
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
Not enough data
2024-07-22
15th Riigikogu, Riigikogu's extraordinary session.
No data available
2024-07-15
15th Riigikogu, Extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
There is insufficient data.
2024-06-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, additional plenary session
There is not enough data.
2024-06-12
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session.
It describes the cooperation with the affected organizations (the Estonian Logistics and Freight Forwarding Association, the Chamber of Commerce and Industry) regarding amendments to the draft legislation. It notes that while attempts were made in the committee to find compromises, the majority forcefully adopted the amendments, citing obstruction of cooperation. It presents proposals for amendments aimed at improving the titles and content of the drafts.
2024-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
There is not enough data.
2024-06-05
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The speaker referred to "dear colleagues" who have also delivered lengthy speeches and highlighted the foolishness of the draft bill, thereby signaling cooperation within the opposition. There is a complete absence of any reference to a willingness to compromise or cross-party cooperation with the government regarding the car tax issue.
2024-06-05
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
They point to a previous successful compromise and cooperation with the Social Democrats when creating tax relief for low-income earners, demonstrating a historical capacity to reach agreements within a coalition. The current communication, however, is purely oppositional and accusatory, highlighting the coalition's failure to meet its social commitments.
2024-05-29
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The cooperation style is only indicated by references to previous questions posed by a party colleague (Priit Sibul), which demonstrates internal party alignment. There is no information regarding bilateral or cross-party cooperation or a willingness to compromise.
2024-05-29
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, information briefing
Not enough data
2024-05-28
15th Riigikogu, third session, plenary session
Insufficient data.
2024-05-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The speaker demonstrates cooperation with colleagues by publicly agreeing with the positions put forward by another deputy (Andres) regarding the bill's shortcomings. This cooperation is limited to opposition members who share similar views, and there is no indication of a willingness to compromise with the government.
2024-05-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, press briefing
Not enough data
2024-05-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The speaker demonstrates internal collaboration and value-based consensus with a colleague ("Dear Tõnis") regarding the historical burden. At the institutional level, the style is rather demanding and inquisitive, seeking a clear position from the government and the commission.
2024-05-13
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
Not enough data
2024-05-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session.
The speaker acts primarily as a critic and questioner. He/She demonstrates a willingness to support other colleagues (Mr. Korobeinik) in resolving procedural matters, agreeing that further questioning is pointless due to the unsatisfactory nature of the response.
2024-04-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
A cooperative style is visible within the Isamaa Party, as the party's official proposal regarding the energy security action plan is presented. Evidence of openness to compromise is lacking on the topic of e-elections, where the politician takes a clearly opposing stance that excludes supporting the draft bill.
2024-04-16
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The speaker refers to the detailed amendment proposals submitted by the Isamaa Party, which demonstrates a readiness to contribute constructively to improving the legislation. At the same time, he expresses disappointment that these proposals, which would have adapted the universal service, were rejected.
2024-04-10
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
Although the speaker's proposals were not supported in the Economic Affairs Committee, he demonstrates a willingness for broad-based cooperation in establishing the investigative committee. To ensure the credibility of the investigative committee, a proposal is being made to include one representative from every Riigikogu faction.
2024-04-10
15th Estonian Parliament, third sitting, information briefing
Information regarding the style of cooperation is absent, except for a reference to intra-factional activity (the meeting of the Isamaa faction with the Director General of the Security Police). There is no mention of openness to compromise or cross-party cooperation.
2024-04-09
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The speaker references the issue of the national credit register, which was raised by a colleague (Reili Rand). This demonstrates awareness of and support for the work being done by the faction or by colleagues who share similar views. There is no indication, however, of any search for cross-party compromise or broader cooperation.
2024-04-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
Not enough data
2024-04-03
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session
There are no signs of cooperation or willingness to compromise; the address is aimed at direct confrontation and criticism directed at the commission's representative.
2024-04-02
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting
Insufficient data.
2024-04-01
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The cooperation is taking place with fellow opposition members; for instance, Riina Solman has also signed the query regarding immigration. There is absolutely no indication of a willingness to compromise with the government. Instead, the emphasis is placed on the government's failure to heed the opposition's proposals.
2024-03-20
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, press briefing.
The speaker indicated a readiness for cross-party cooperation, noting that the necessary 81 votes required to amend the constitution are mathematically secured. This suggests a desire to find support outside the coalition in order to pass a specific piece of legislation.
2024-03-19
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
Not enough data.
2024-03-18
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
It demonstrates cooperation with their colleague ("Good colleague Varro Vooglaid already provided examples"), referring to the coordinated presentation of arguments during the plenary session. Information regarding the search for cross-party compromise is lacking.
2024-03-13
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting.
The current style of interaction is confrontational, as the speaker is presenting a direct counter-argument to the colleague's assertion. Although the speaker addresses the chair politely, the communication directed at the colleague is intended solely to refute their position.
2024-03-13
15th Estonian Parliament, third sitting, information briefing
No data available.
2024-03-11
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
The speaker demonstrated cooperation with colleagues on the matter, specifically referencing the follow-up to the question concerning demography that was submitted by Varro Vooglaid. There is no information available regarding the search for a compromise between the political parties.
2024-03-05
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The speaker respectfully addresses the recipient as "dear fellow member of the Economic Commission," which suggests a certain level of interaction within the commission. While the address is polite, the content of the speech itself is challenging and critical, and is not directly aimed at reaching a compromise.
2024-03-04
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The speaker is proposing a solution that they believe would satisfy all parties ("the wolves are fed and the sheep are safe"), specifically by avoiding direct additional taxation of banks while simultaneously preventing the generation of windfall profits. This points to a desire to find a pragmatic solution that doesn't undermine the banks' business model.
2024-02-22
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting
Not enough data.
2024-02-21
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The speaker references previous collaboration during coalition negotiations, specifically where Isamaa put forward a proposal for the removal of voting rights (disenfranchisement). In the current context, their style is rather confrontational, demanding specific measures and solutions from the Minister to address the demographic crisis. Information regarding current inter-party cooperation is unavailable.
2024-02-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The cooperation style is supportive of the Isamaa party and Urmas Reinsalu, emphasizing their shared approach to considering the views of entrepreneurs. A willingness is demonstrated to continue topics raised by other colleagues (Arvo Aller), indicating a certain level of topic-based collaboration.
2024-02-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The speaker for Isamaa referred to previous cooperation or similar ideas, noting that the Social Democrats had also proposed a price cap during negotiations during the energy crisis. Generally, communication with the Minister is inquisitive and demanding, as they seek opportunities to improve the draft legislation between the two readings.
2024-02-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
There is not enough data.
2024-02-13
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
Lack of data
2024-02-07
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
Insufficient data.
2024-02-05
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting
The speaker supportively references the arguments made by other colleagues (Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart, Mart, Varro Vooglaid) regarding the tourism tax and boosting domestic tourism, demonstrating a willingness to support the opposition's shared positions. He/She invites the Prime Minister to visit his/her tourism farm to speak with Saaremaa entrepreneurs, which indicates a desire for dialogue, despite the sharp criticism.
2024-01-24
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The current situation has been described as precluding collaboration, but the question posed to the minister indicates a desire to see future changes and an openness to compromise in the legislative process.
2024-01-23
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
Insufficient data.
2024-01-22
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The speaker referenced the contributions of their colleagues ("Aivar already covered quite a few aspects"), demonstrating a certain level of cooperation within the faction. They addressed the minister cordially, yet firmly, seeking a solution to the situation where the minister simultaneously manages both the climate and nature conservation portfolios.
2024-01-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
The speaker stresses the importance of international cooperation, putting forward participation in Finnish nuclear energy production as a strategic solution. On the domestic front, the approach is consultative, offering the government a concrete political alternative for deliberation.
2024-01-11
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The speakers strongly urged the coalition and the opposition toward joint work and statesmanship, emphasizing that the unresolved issues within the draft bill should be settled together in the committees. They are open to compromise and constructive discussion between the readings to avoid unnecessary verbal sparring.