By Plenary Sessions: Lauri Laats

An emphatically decisive and critical tone is used, yet it maintains an official and structured mode of address. It employs direct quotes, questions, and provocative observations (e.g., “How does this stand?”; “What is your position?”), which provides the companion and listener with immediate food for thought. In the written texts, it combines facts and colorful expressions, but strictly adheres to a formal and fact-focused style.

A formal and appropriately interrogative tone; poses specific questions and requests clarification. Utilizes references to data and legislation, not emotional rhetoric.

It employs irony and a questionnaire; the tone is critical, analytical, and invites debate, rather than being irritated. The examples provided (e.g., application ratings) reinforce the arguments, and the focus remains rational, not emotional.

Occasionally combative and sharp, it uses direct, challenging questions and a sarcastic tone (e.g., the MacLaren example). It aims for both emotional and rational emphasis, uses a blend of facts and examples, and stresses fairness and the assessment of economic impacts.

A stern, confrontational, and blunt tone; used with the goal of verifying veracity, it frequently poses direct questions and strong accusations. It handles the input intensely and emotionally, yet remains grounded in fact-referenced materials.

The emphasis is critically forceful in its dismantling; it employs an emotional tone, quotes, and personal references, adding repetitions and humorous segments (e.g., "Kräpp või räpp"). The questions and provocations are directed toward criticizing the government's actions, all while maintaining a formal, rambling discourse.

The focus is on fact-based arguments blended with emotional appeals. Speakers adopt a critical yet sincere tone, coupled with affirmative and inviting phrases (“please vote,” “support this bill”). Short, memorable references to historical events and enumeration are employed to boost credibility and inject a degree of enthusiasm into the rhetoric, moving beyond mere routine formality. The texts also feature recurring stylistic emphasis and nationally unifying language.

Speaks in a tone combining directness and combativeness; employs rhetorical questions and frequent personal references. This creates a dynamic, provocative structure, while emphasizing factual scrutiny.

A controlled, critical, and emotionally balanced address. It utilizes specific examples (the high cost of notary fees, the snowball effect) and takes the form of questioning inquiries designed to highlight the answers. It presents powerful observations and employs slightly amusing metaphors, but ultimately sticks firmly to the facts and the core argument.