By Plenary Sessions: Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart

The tone is critical, highlighting the protection of constitutional rights, while remaining cooperative. It issues strong warnings about the “imitation society” and the threat of unconstitutionality, and utilizes emotional expressions to emphasize the protection of the fundamental rights of the parties. The text is long, filled with technical details and recommendations, but this is balanced by a certain willingness to cooperate.

The speech is critical and carries a strong emotional charge, often utilizing questions and provocative statements. The tone is bombastic, yet logical, emphasizing the protection of fundamental rights and adherence to democratic principles; it employs unsettling observations and examples to systematically organize counterarguments.

The speaker employs a strong, confrontational, and emotional tone, coupled with logical arguments. The style of presentation is sharply critical, questioning, and uses direct personal address. The text is informative, yet combines high tension and urgency with a careful, fact-based discussion.

The speaker employs a combative, emotional, and critical style, positioning themselves as a defender of rights and a listener to the voice of the people. They use strongly negative rhetoric ("punishment state," "lies to the people") and incorporate historical references (the Soviet period) and questions to heighten the emotional impact. The text is highly colloquial, yet simultaneously formalized, and often openly operates within a matrix of moral judgment.

An urgent and data-driven tone; it employs questions and warnings (e.g., how funding impacts the future and public safety); the writing is critical, but not angry, rather, it is a reasoned search for answers.

The tone is formal and measured, and uses questions to prompt discussion and clarity. It is selectively focused on justification and procedure, not emotionally aggressive, and is a blend of highlighting facts and rights.

A distinctly analytical and fact-based style is emphasized; uses structured arguments, lists points and questions, and rejects hasty decisions. The discourse is formal, incorporating guidelines and legal nuances, and includes controlled expressions of emotion, but generally maintains a calm, yet decisive tone.

The tone, which is both investigative and fact-based, blends with an emotional appeal (focusing on children's health and safety) and a hasty, solution-oriented rhetoric. While occasionally critical and accusatory, the overall aim is to foster cooperation and consensus voting. It utilizes concrete examples and substantive argumentation, often repeatedly drawing attention back to the specific context of Tallinn.

A critical and fact-based tone, blending emotional discussion (trust, unity) with consistent logical argumentation (the impact of taxes, the breaking of promises). It employs direct questions and appeals to moral conventions to emphasize accountability and elicit responses and explanations. The text is formal, but requires a strong ethical and community-based reference point.

The tone is formal and direct, grounded in factual data. Specific examples and figures are used, and questions are posed to the minister; the style is critical, but not irritated.

A blend of extensive argumentation and an emotional shift: it utilizes powerful questions and contrasting examples to elicit responses and highlight the damages inflicted. The text is detailed, lengthy, and formal, yet in certain sections, a critical, provocative tone emerges regarding the prosecution and the underlying signals/indicators. The address incorporates both logical and emotional appeals, focusing on the necessity of operating strictly within the legal framework.