By Plenary Sessions: Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart

The primary focus is on the opposition to the legislation aimed at preventing money laundering and terrorist financing, and the associated establishment of a “super database.” [The party/group] demands the removal of the bill from the agenda, and the suspension of the extraordinary committee session and the third reading, in order to prevent constitutional conflicts. It recognizes the necessity of constitutional review and the existence of independent checks, and rejects the hasty procedure.

The main institutional attention has been focused on the law regarding police body cameras, the limits on the use of associated data, the necessity of threat assessment and independent oversight, and the regulation of official access. It has been noted that the draft bill is akin to a defective proposal and there is a call for its rejection during the first reading; the discussion should instead center on fundamental rights and oversight.

Key Item: a draft bill concerning the super database being created by the Financial Intelligence Unit and the use of its data, including the creation of profiles; the speaker opposes the bill and demands its halt, along with thorough supervision and legal protection. The focus of these speeches is the critique of legislation and control, and the expansion of the discussion.

The core stance opposes the expansion of the Competition Authority and the simplified administrative procedure. The desire is to submit amendments from the Centre Party that would preserve constitutionality and prevent the excessive increase of officials' powers. He/She refers to the necessity of utilizing existing penal law norms and the guidance/opinions provided by the Chancellor of Justice, emphasizing that the Riigikogu and the legal committees are aligned on this issue. He/She promises to participate in future votes and adhere to the fundamental values of democracy.

The focus is on the budget level and the legislation concerning the long-term infrastructure plan; the need is emphasized to approve next year's supplementary funding and to incorporate major financing projects (e.g., Rail Baltica) as part of the planning process for the state budget and the infrastructure plan.

The legislative focus centers on interpreting the scope and constitutionality of criminal procedure rights within the context of the draft bill. It highlights the necessity for clarity regarding the extension of these rights to legal entities and ensuring alignment with the stance taken by the Chancellor of Justice. The representative noted that future efforts must rely on the interaction of legal principles and institutions, and did not offer any specific updates on progress or guarantees of the bill's adoption.

Close attention to the quality of regulatory drafts within policy security requires clear grounds detailing what data may be collected and when it must be destroyed, as well as the establishment of independent oversight for legal protection. The primary objective is to ensure a lawful basis and a clear control mechanism before proceeding, along with the organization and quality of the debate and the subsequent discussion of the draft legislation.

The agenda includes the amendment of the Traffic Act and the adoption of local draft regulations: restrictions on rented light personal vehicles (e.g., e-scooters) and small mopeds at the local government level; a provision for checking age and driving rights, as well as helmet rental; emphasis is placed on the speed of implementing the changes, adopting the bill by summer, and considering a second reading.

Not enough data

Not enough data.

The primary objective is to test the interpretation of the provision regarding corporate liability and to establish a precedent for the better resolution of future cases. It is noted that the enforcement of this provision is currently under discussion, along with the necessity of establishing relevant case law. Furthermore, clarifications are anticipated, and potentially additional legislative work, in order to better guide the supervision and internal organization of legal entities. The provision has been referred to as a necessary instrument for the protection of victims and for future prevention.