By Plenary Sessions: Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart

This clearly demonstrates a willingness to cooperate: It recognizes the coalition's readiness to work together and hopes that similar cooperation will continue regarding future bills submitted by the Centre Party. It recommends organizing an extraordinary committee session and contacting the Chairman of the Finance Committee to find a solution at a broad-based level.

A certain willingness to cooperate is demonstrated (for example, the Center Party faction's proposal to reject the bill during its first reading), yet the coalition's method of processing procedural blocks and amendments is simultaneously criticized. Cooperation has been limited, and while the necessity for broad-based discussion and compromise is emphasized, the actions often symbolize confrontation.

It indicates a certain willingness to cooperate, mentioning colleagues who have taken steps to raise questions, and shows readiness to suspend the experimental draft bill. It refers to the possibility of cooperation and the importance of cross-party discussions; it documents the readiness to involve other factions in collaborative efforts.

The speaker mentions cooperation with the Center Party faction, referencing meetings with the Chancellor of Justice and committee debates. However, deep involvement in cooperative efforts to adopt new bills is not permitted, resulting in an awkward process, and it is stressed that trade unions were unable to be included. He/She indicates a readiness to submit the Center Party’s amendments, emphasizing that they must avoid being unconstitutional. The overall tone expresses a willingness to cooperate, yet remains critical, prioritizing the communication of their own faction’s viewpoints.

Not enough data

There is insufficient data regarding the modes of cooperation; the impression is that a question concerning clarification and legitimacy was raised first, rather than an active form of coalition.

It demonstrates a readiness for broader cooperation, particularly in the area of social policy (such as free kindergartens) and in expanding state aid to local municipalities. It seeks to achieve consensus and emphasizes that all measures must be coordinated at the national level. While critical of specific partners and past policy experience, it does not rule out future collaboration.

Readiness for cooperation and compromise is expressed: emphasis is placed on joint action by the coalition and the opposition, and on making necessary clarifications during the second reading; reference is also made to the consensual support within the Tallinn City Council and the desire for national and local level solutions to advance in tandem.

Not enough data

Insufficient data.

The speaker remains open to cooperation concerning the adoption and deliberation of legislation, noting that the Riigikogu has passed a specific provision. He encourages the implementation of this provision and the establishment of a precedent. Although specific nationwide cooperation or collaboration with the special opposition is not mentioned, he refers to a call for discussion and synergy within the Riigikogu regarding the interpretation of these stipulations. He demonstrates a readiness to take legal measures and test them collectively.