By Plenary Sessions: Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart

The measure supports the reduction of VAT for agricultural producers, viewing it as a means to boost the competitiveness of production. It is mentioned that the Centre Party has already submitted relevant draft legislation supporting this initiative, and the support of coalition partners and the government is now requested.

Very clearly opposes the cutting of funding for extracurricular activities; emphasizes that the funding must be maintained and that it is valuable for the family and the child's development. It does not present broad macroeconomic or tax-specific recommendations; instead, it focuses on educational support and family assistance.

Not enough data

Economic viewpoints are characterized by a focus on families' financial relief and concern for inflation and the cost of living. Talking about taxes as a means to collect money to feed families (school meals, school sports support, extracurricular education) and the idea of a digital tax for foreign large corporations, it emphasizes a balanced tax burden and the need for a more equitable distribution of it. It is against a bank tax and stresses the need not to burden those who are long-term profit earners, but to focus on the well-being of families and young people.

The economic policy approach is budgetary prudence and cost optimization without additional taxes for ordinary citizens; it favors targeted taxes, such as a windfall profit tax on banks, as a source of supplementary revenue, and emphasizes the necessity of directing funds directly to the structural needs of specific sectors (e.g., healthcare). The outlined critique is based on the redistribution of costs and the protection of vulnerable people.

The focus is on the assessment of social and fiscal consequences; it criticizes car tax cuts and the coordination of support for, or opposition to, these measures. It emphasizes that the redistribution of tax revenue and insufficient support measures increase the risk of poverty, especially among people with disabilities. It does not represent broad economic policy rhetoric, but rather stresses the necessity of budgetary principles that are thrifty and restrictive, yet fairly targeted.

Insufficient data.