By Plenary Sessions: Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart

Not enough data.

Speeches delivered at plenary sessions in the context of Question Time; refers to the role of the European Union Affairs Committee and the criticism exchanged between ministers; uses the format of questions and references to former leaders (e.g., Kalle Laanet), and emphasizes the necessity of increasing resources and analysis. The address demonstrates regular parliamentary oversight and the scrutiny of official competencies.

Delivered as a speech; it references earlier amendments to the Weapons Act and the initiatives behind them (which originated from the Ministry of the Interior during the previous term). This demonstrates ongoing focus on the regulatory trajectory and suggests considering expanded cooperation.

He repeatedly participates in the plenary sessions and discussion rounds, consistently highlighting his package of draft laws (child benefits, school meals, school sports support, extracurricular education) and issues concerning the well-being of young people. He juxtaposes his proposed draft laws with the option of digital tax funding and demands specific feedback or a vote from the coalition. He refers to previous discussions and mentions specific individuals and their connections, emphasizing the need for cross-parliamentary cooperation, but also, if desired, highlighting the overtly contentious political opposition.

The speeches were delivered during the information session on the same day that ruling coalition topics were discussed (pension indexation, the security tax, hospital development projects). The speaker actively referenced the draft legislation, the internal dynamics of the coalition, and the proceedings between the coalition partners, stressing the necessity of cooperation concerning the hospital project. Addressing ministers and coalition partners with questions and comments is standard practice.

He/She speaks at the plenary session and focuses on criticizing constitutional issues and budget management; references previous debates and stakeholder engagement, and stresses the need for greater transparency. He/She notes that postponed or consolidated amendments have been problematic and calls for corrective action.

A single plenary address refers to the ongoing bill and proceedings; the presentation is specific and geared toward questions.