By Plenary Sessions: Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart

The tone is formal and collaborative; it uses expressions of gratitude and direct questions to clearly engage the minister in discussion. The argumentation is based on previous proposals and sector-specific rationale, not emotion.

An analytical, formal, and slightly challenging tone; uses specific examples and references to experts, and poses questions (e.g., "do you plan to...?") to strengthen the argument. It highlights legal considerations and logical conclusions, not an emotional attack.

A formal and relevant tone; utilizes precise references and legal context. The presentation is structured in a question-and-answer format (e.g., whether the draft legislation corrects the error), reflecting a demanding, yet polite and constructive critique.

The emphasis is on a combination of unconditional empathy and pragmatism: emotionally warm and heartfelt for families and young people, yet sharply critical of both the coalition and the opposition. It uses questions and examples (family burdens, property prices, inflation) and references to previous bills to demonstrate the necessity of their solutions. They often employ formal address ("Thank you"), strong statements, and a narrative focusing on healthy nutrition and sustainable investments for the benefit of children.

The emphasis is placed on criticizing unnecessary expenditures and employing emotional and direct rhetoric; it utilizes rhetorical questions, sarcasm, and a fiercely critical tone directed at the government and ministers. Typically, the texts feature a fact-based approach coupled with a strong moral undertone.

Well-reasoned, yet critical and slightly accusatory in its phrasing; it poses questions regarding certain aspects (how and why) and emphasizes underlying principles rather than merely presenting facts. The tone is formal, but includes emotional elements (the voice of the people, the defense of rights), and the length and detail of the address enhance its persuasiveness.

The tone is anxious and alarming, employing interrogative sentences, warnings, and references to historical context; the style is formal, yet utilizes emotional warning signs.