By Plenary Sessions: Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart

There is insufficient data regarding cooperation and coalitions; the information presented focuses on a single interaction with ministers and the submission of questions, without any reference to joint work or coalition initiatives.

There is an acknowledgment of the need to seek consensus and maintain continuous parliamentary dialogue, but warnings and criticisms are simultaneously and clearly articulated. Cooperation will continue within the limits of the coalition agreement, but the role and transparency of the Riigikogu are emphasized during the handling of draft legislation. Although their own bill has been presented, the text demonstrates a willingness to participate in parliamentary debates and the legislative process, while simultaneously demanding strict oversight.

Not enough data

It demonstrates a readiness to cooperate with local authorities (including joint meetings with the Association of Estonian Cities and Municipalities) and emphasizes the necessity of resolving funding issues through this collaboration. It champions the idea that local governments and the state must find common ground, asserting that cooperation is essential for the successful implementation of the care reform and the effective addressing of social matters.

He is seeking cooperation with the coalition, mentioning the need for "cooperation between the coalition and the opposition," and wants the bill he submitted to be quickly taken up for debate; at the same time, he clearly emphasizes that the solution must be constitutional and transparent.

Insufficient data.

Refers to colleague Lauri Laats and shared criticism, demonstrating cooperation within their faction. Using a collaborative format, the same concern is raised among other opposition members; however, it does not clearly indicate broader, state-level, coalition-friendly approaches.

There is no clear evidence of a broad cooperative approach between the coalition and other factions. The emphasis lies primarily on the faction's opposition vote and resistance to both the constitutionality of the draft bill and any corrective amendments. Regarding coalition cooperation, no significant examples of collaborative forms are presented; instead, the rhetoric is critical and focused on highlighting disagreements.

It demonstrates a time-sensitive approach and a desire for cooperation via the accountability and information hours (evidenced by the reiteration of invitations sent and the promotion of guest participation). Nevertheless, concrete cooperation or coalition measures are absent; the focus remains primarily on questions and critical oversight. There is no direct mention of services or mechanisms for coalition or bipartisan collaboration.

Demonstrates readiness for cooperation and engagement: refers to stakeholder proposals and expresses the desire for these to be reflected in the budget, emphasizes early risk prevention; mentions cooperation with the Special Anti-Corruption Committee and other parties.