By Plenary Sessions: Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart

Demonstrates limited willingness to cooperate—emphasizes a factional proposal and the need for broad-based debate, but fails to highlight broader, multi-party cooperation or compromise proposals. The absence of local coalitions or a sincere joint decision is not emphasized.

Data unavailable

Critical, yet it partially demonstrates a readiness for discussion and external consultation, referencing the hearing of viewpoints from other institutions and officials (PPA, Health Insurance Fund, Ministry of Finance). However, it emphasizes that any compromise must be grounded in fundamental rights and established conclusions, and calls on the government to withdraw the draft bill, which suggests an unreliable capacity for cooperation with the coalition. While a search for cooperation is partially evident, it is preceded by a strong block of criticism.

Requests and emphasizes cooperation through parliamentary channels (special committee, Riigikogu members, Minister of Finance). At the same time, it stresses transparency and information sharing, demonstrating a readiness for cooperation if it enhances accountability and oversight.

He/She addresses the Chancellor of Justice respectfully, demonstrating a readiness to cooperate with both the Chancellor of Justice and the Prosecutor's Office, while seeking guidance and clarification. His/Her approach is centered on cooperation and oversight.

Insufficient data

It confirms cooperation with colleagues and law enforcement: the crime report has been forwarded to the Central Criminal Police, and it emphasizes the necessity of continuing the discussion within the special committee. It also demonstrates readiness for more global, parliamentary ties and institutional cooperation.

Mentions the positions of his colleague, Jürgen Ligi, but does not show a clear desire to achieve broad cooperation with coalition partners. Focuses more on control and accountability than on broad-based cooperation; an open approach to parliamentary debate, albeit with a critical undertone.

Seeking a critical cooperative relationship, but primarily oriented towards control and accountability. He/She invites the minister to a session and online platforms for discussion, but simultaneously indicates that cooperation with the coalition is limited, and that cooperation requires increased transparency and oversight. He/She demonstrates a readiness to utilize a special committee and parliamentary oversight to resolve the issues.

Insufficient data

Emphasis is often placed on cooperation and inclusion with the coalition, including the desire to organize joint sessions with the Legal Oversight and Constitutional Committees; there is a readiness to find compromises, but at the same time, the necessity of considering the opposition's viewpoints and legal limits is stressed. They speak of the wish to incorporate proposals from various opposition factions and, where necessary, facilitate cross-committee discussions.