By Plenary Sessions: Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart

The main focus is the suspension of the bill’s second reading, the necessity for risk analyses and contingency plans, and specific amendments to the bill’s wording (limited scope of cameras, control over data access). The projected outcome in the absence of progress is highlighted, and emphasis is placed on conducting a broad debate and clarifying the legislation before its adoption.

The main priority is bringing the draft law to the budgetary and regulatory level, where all rental services would be covered by an insurance requirement; it emphasizes the need for unified regulation and discussion within committees, and draws attention to the fact that the decision was made in favor of a single company.

The main objective is the Super Database Bill, the associated constitutional and privacy risks, and the withdrawal or radical restructuring of this draft law. Attention is also being paid to discussions concerning traffic insurance regulations for light personal mobility devices and potential solutions for regulating micro-mopeds, but the focus remains strongly on decisions related to opposing the bill and reviewing the process. The speaker emphasizes that further changes must comply with the Constitution and the fundamental principles of consumer protection and rights protection.

It emphasizes parliamentary oversight and the provision of information to the Riigikogu. Instead, it wishes to see a transferable insider list and increased utilization of legal frameworks for oversight; focusing on legally guaranteeing transparency, access to information, and potential organizational changes.

The legislative focus centers on defining the parliament's competencies and the rules governing access to information within the framework of anti-corruption oversight. He/She raises the question of whether the commission is authorized to request internal information and what the role of commercial secrets is when providing justifications, emphasizing the need for clarity regarding potential permits or authorizations.

The main objective is protecting the autonomy of local governments and resisting central tax changes. It points to the possibility of appealing to the Supreme Court and monitoring tax-related decisions, and emphasizes that local governments must be able to resist and, if necessary, utilize legal remedies. Specific legislative approaches are lacking; the focus is on protecting autonomy and limiting the impact of tax changes.

Focuses on increasing the transparency of the work and cases handled by the special anti-corruption committee; emphasizes the need for continued discussion of the topic during sessions and in accordance with the legal system. The analysis of oversight and the implementation of legislation is of paramount importance.

The legislative focus is on labor policy reforms and the proper implementation of impact assessments; it emphasizes that analysis and criticism of government positions are crucial when reviewing draft legislation. It seeks the advancement of bills to the second reading and broader parliamentary debate, while simultaneously demanding greater transparency and accountability concerning the state budget.

The focus parameters include the work of the special anti-corruption commission, the investigation of internal information leaks, and the strengthening of oversight via parliamentary mechanisms. It draws the attention of the National Audit Office and seeks responses concerning state institutions and their leaders; it emphasizes the necessity of providing explanations, increasing transparency, and ensuring the effective monitoring of public expenditures. It does not put forward specific numerical legislative proposals but concentrates instead on matters of supervision and ethical oversight.

Focus on oversight and special inspection: [The group/They] want to initiate a special audit concerning RMK's secret contracts, leading to a discussion about whether and how answers can be obtained. Furthermore, questions concerning transparency and legislative responses are addressed through parliamentary inquiries.

The main legislative priorities include the car tax bill and the systemic risks associated with it (including conflict with European Union law and constitutional violation), amendments to administrative procedures, changes to the Security Activities Act, and legislative proposals concerning budget transparency and the separate accounting of public expenditures. Also crucial are the adequacy of the activities of the special anti-corruption committee and the protection of the instruments of parliamentary democracy; opinions and interpellations are submitted regarding these topics.