By Plenary Sessions: Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart

Constructive and geared toward cooperation; seeks common solutions with the coalition and the opposition, and emphasizes the importance of compromise.

The text demonstrates a willingness to compromise and consider the positions of various political parties. This raises the question of whether subsequent steps and legislative drafts will garner wider support (for instance, regarding the 9% VAT reduction). While there is discussion about cooperation and inclusion, no specific extensive coalition collaboration is detailed.

Not enough data.

Indicates a willingness to cooperate on certain specific issues, such as the reduction of VAT on local products; expresses a desire to listen and gather other ideas, and to foster a bipartisan or non-aligned discussion, while simultaneously maintaining a critical stance toward some of the coalition’s decisions.

Not enough data

Insufficient data.

It demonstrates cooperation with the Centre Party (“with the support of the Centre Party”) and has initiated a corresponding appeal. The text refers to a common position and case-specific action, but remains open to legal, if not political, cooperation. Furthermore, the ability to cooperate is presented in the context of circumventing the car tax.

Cooperation is emphasized not only with the opposition but also with stakeholders: legislative drafts and amendments have been prepared collaboratively, specifically "together with the Association of Large Families and the Chamber of Disabled People." The necessity of dialogue with coalition partners is mentioned, as well as the need, if required, for a broader societal dialogue and even taking issues all the way to the Supreme Court. Readiness is demonstrated for cooperation and the involvement of multiple parties in order to improve tax policy.

There is a strong lack of evidence of cooperation; the speaker emphasizes Parliament's right to receive information and a willingness to meet with supervisory bodies and commissions, but specific bipartisan cooperation mechanisms or joint agreements have not been presented. This creates the impression of an approach focused less on collaboration and more on oversight and transparency.

The text indicates a readiness to discuss and engage, but it does not mention specific forms of cooperation or joint proposals; instead, it focuses on advancing dialogue through questions.