By Plenary Sessions: Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart

The primary focus is on amending the Law on Churches and Congregations; it is emphasized that the changes may be introduced within the framework of a separate act, and the objective is to achieve consensus and procedural efficiency.

The primary activity involves draft legislation relating to tax policy at the legislative level (the proposal for a reduction to 9%), as well as the regulatory framework for the Chancellor of Justice and the Law Enforcement Act. At the legislative level, emphasis is placed on the need for a legislative basis and clarity in privacy and surveillance laws, and the question is raised whether current regulations ensure the protection of fundamental rights.

Not enough data.

The main topics covered include tax policy bills (car tax, VAT, income tax), improving budget transparency, and the analysis of the impact of previous support measures in light of the reports from the National Audit Office. Ideas are presented and discussion is invited, emphasizing the need for further bills in the near future.

The primary objective is to establish modern regulations for ride-sharing services and mitigate associated risks (e.g., mandatory liability insurance for scooters). Objections regarding the undermining (torpedoing) of the European Union directive are mentioned, and the necessity of ensuring additional social guarantees and labor rights is stressed. Less focus is placed on the specific details of drafting the bills, but there is a clear emphasis on increasing regulations, enhancing safety, and ensuring EU legislative oversight.

The speech focuses on tax policy and budget discussions, emphasizing that the coalition is failing to answer questions regarding the sustainability of the taxes and demanding that the relevant draft bill be submitted to the Riigikogu (Parliament). It criticizes the opaqueness of the debate and calls on the government to move towards transparency and accountability, citing the need for clarification regarding the national energy development plan and the proposed legislation.

The establishment of specific provisions and the resolution of constitutional issues concerning the car tax have been emphasized as a legislative priority; reference is made to appeals and court proceedings, as well as the necessity to debate the implementation of these provisions in the Riigikogu. He/It holds the role of both initiator and objector: it is argued that these specific provisions are necessary, and that it is possible to integrate court rulings and political debate into the constitutional framework. Progress or achievements in a specific procedure have been cited as potential developments, but formally, they remain a work in progress.

The main goals are the repeal of the car tax law and challenging it through the courts and the administrative court. The speaker emphasizes a systemic and substantive approach to legislative activity, highlighting the necessity of involving stakeholders and, if required, appealing to the Supreme Court. Alternative actions are also referenced, along with clearly established priorities: improving tax policy and finding a socially fairer solution.

The main undertaking is parliamentary oversight and transparency: it demands the public disclosure of the list of insiders, an explanation of the anti-corruption committee's investigative activities, and the guarantee of the right of Riigikogu members to inquire. The focus is on strengthening oversight and transparency in state-owned enterprises.

The need is stressed to establish conditions and regulatory instruments more broadly, not merely through an ostensible directive; specific drafts or processes are currently lacking, but the emphasis remains on finding solutions through legislation.