By Plenary Sessions: Kalle Grünthal

Not enough data

The speaker positively references a topic raised by a colleague (Anastassia) concerning the ethical suitability of the Minister of Finance, showing a willingness to rely on the arguments of other opposition members. Beyond this, there is no evidence of broader cooperation or a readiness to compromise with the government.

There is no data available concerning the style of cooperation; the addresses are framed more as questions and legal challenges directed at a specific recipient, demanding that they evaluate the legal line of reasoning presented.

Data is scarce.

The speaker refers to the broad-based cooperation between trade and employers' associations in opposing the government's policy. There is no information regarding the speaker's own willingness to cooperate with the government coalition; instead, the unity of the opposing camp is emphasized.

Not enough data.

Insufficient data.

This collaborative approach focuses on responding to proposals put forth by the public and officials, citing as an example the draft Hunting Act, which stemmed from concerns raised by an environmental inspector and hunters. He/She stresses that this represented "the people's opinion." There is, however, no information available regarding cross-party cooperation or the search for compromises at the level of the Riigikogu (Parliament).

There is not enough data.