By Plenary Sessions: Kalle Grünthal
Total Sessions: 141
Fully Profiled: 141
2025-10-15
The 15th Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
The speaker's style in this context is purely confrontational and demanding, focusing on challenging the minister's responses and policy. There is no evidence of seeking cooperation or readiness to compromise with other political forces.
2025-10-08
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The style of cooperation is evident outside the Riigikogu, relying on the authority and arguments of top legal experts (Varro Vooglaid, Carri Ginter) regarding constitutional law matters. There are no indications of collaboration with other Riigikogu members or a willingness to compromise.
2025-10-07
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The speaker references cooperation or a convergence of views with Urmas Reinsalu, whose interpellation regarding officials' salaries he supports and expands upon in his own question. The tone in the assembly hall is generally oppositional and demanding, centered on calling the presiding officer and the rapporteur to order. No openness to compromise or cross-party cooperation is expressed in the addresses.
2025-10-06
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
Insufficient data
2025-09-24
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.
Not enough data
2025-09-23
15th Riigikogu, 6th session, plenary session
There is no direct evidence of cooperation, but the speaker refers to the Centre Party's proposal to move the motor vehicle tax bill up to Tuesday's agenda, which suggests similar procedural stances. Openness to compromise is not mentioned; instead, the management is being demanded to implement measures.
2025-09-22
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
No data available
2025-09-17
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting.
Insufficient data. The speaker acknowledges and commends the positions of Varro Vooglaid and Urmas Reinsalu, but information regarding direct cooperation or willingness to compromise with other parties is lacking.
2025-09-16
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.
The speaker thanks the Chancellor of Justice and his office for identifying the problem, which indicates a willingness to cooperate with supervisory bodies in exposing legal violations by state institutions. The cooperative approach is supportive of those who help disclose the state's unlawful activities.
2025-09-10
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
No data is available regarding cooperation. The speaker's style is strictly confrontational, focusing on publicly calling out the minister and refuting their positions.
2025-09-10
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, press briefing
Insufficient data
2025-09-09
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session.
There is no information available regarding cooperation or the search for compromises; the address was presented as a direct and demanding question to the minister, requiring a response to the serious conclusion put forth by the public.
2025-09-04
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
The speaker operates largely independently, submitting draft legislation and challenging procedures. Previous cooperation with the EKRE faction has ended, but they refer to bills submitted in the faction’s name and support the positions of other opposition members (e.g., Korobeinik, Seeder, Kaljulaid) in procedural disputes. Cooperation with the government is ruled out, with the focus instead being on confrontation.
2025-06-19
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
It seeks institutional cooperation, proposing the convocation of the Council of Elders to discuss the matter, and pointing to the option of appealing to the Supreme Court through the constitutional review procedure. This demonstrates a willingness to utilize existing institutional mechanisms to resolve the conflict.
2025-06-17
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
There is not enough data.
2025-06-16
XV Riigikogu, V Session, Plenary Sitting
Data is scarce.
2025-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
There is insufficient information regarding the style of cooperation, but the speaker refers to the truthfulness of the claims presented by another opposition MP (Varro Vooglaid). He addresses the coalition MPs with a direct request to support suspending the reading of the bill, but the overall tone is confrontational and uncompromising.
2025-06-10
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting.
The speaker emphasizes the coalition's disregard for the warnings issued by opposition members, pointing to a clear lack of cooperation. Instead of seeking compromise, the speaker is looking for ways to launch a legal challenge through the courts.
2025-06-09
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Insufficient data
2025-06-04
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The collaborative approach is open to compromises on details—for instance, regarding the choice of time zone when abolishing the practice of changing clocks (daylight saving time)—provided the main objective is achieved. He/She refers to prior communication with colleagues (Leo Kunnas) and notes the support for his/her arguments from ministry representatives (e.g., Triinu Sillamaa).
2025-06-04
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing
Insufficient data.
2025-06-03
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fifth session, plenary session
Not enough data
2025-04-24
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Not enough data.
2025-04-23
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The cooperation is demonstrated through the praise given to colleague Rain Epler (EKRE faction) for his sharp intellect and significant exposé, suggesting positive relationships within the faction. When dealing with the government, there is a total absence of readiness to compromise, highlighting the opposition's failure to halt the government's steamroller.
2025-04-22
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
There is no data regarding cooperation, willingness to compromise, or cross-factional activity. The focus is on criticizing the presenter and demanding answers to questions.
2025-04-15
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
The speaker is firmly committed to their draft bill but concedes that amendments can be made. They call on colleagues to support the bill and request that the Chairwoman of the Anti-Corruption Committee take the topic (lobbying and the application of the law) into her jurisdiction.
2025-04-10
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Insufficient data
2025-04-09
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
There is insufficient data.
2025-04-08
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
Insufficient data
2025-03-27
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
Insufficient data.
2025-03-26
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing
Insufficient data.
2025-03-25
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Data regarding the cooperation style is unavailable, as the speaker is currently engaged in a direct and sharp confrontation with the bill's proponent, demanding answers and criticizing the draft's deficiencies.
2025-03-24
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session.
Refers to a clear question posed by a colleague (Helle-Moonika Helme) regarding the importance of national defense and nuclear technology, using it to support their own position. This demonstrates internal consistency and shared views within the party or faction.
2025-03-19
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The style of cooperation is pragmatic, acknowledging the serious approach of the National Defence Committee to the issue, but rejecting the proposals to withdraw or postpone the draft legislation. He proposes sending the bill for a second reading in order to refine the legal wording and reach an acceptable resolution.
2025-03-18
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fifth sitting, plenary session
The speaker is antagonistic towards the government, but shows cooperation with colleagues by joining Mart Helme’s question concerning the minister’s absence. He relies on external expertise, referencing a group of scientists who have made proposals for increasing the birth rate.
2025-03-17
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The speaker collaborates with scientists, using the facts and proposals they present as the basis for policy. The role of the Social Affairs Committee in addressing the issue is also emphasized, but it is acknowledged that the final decision-making authority rests with the government.
2025-03-13
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
Not enough data.
2025-03-12
15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session
The referencing of Valdo Randpere’s arguments hints at cooperation, indicating the existence of a shared concern regarding procedural issues. There is no information about broader cross-party cooperation or a readiness to compromise concerning the criticized committees.
2025-02-27
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The speaker references the questions raised by Rene Kokk and Martin Helme to support their argument regarding the duties of the session chairman. This suggests collaboration with certain fellow faction members when submitting procedural questions. There is absolutely no indication of any willingness to compromise with either the government or the session chairman.
2025-02-26
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Although the speaker favors the parliamentary custom of refining good ideas that have legal flaws so they are not lost, his direct communication style with ministers and rapporteurs is rather demanding and critical. He emphasizes the need to refine the draft bill for improvement, rather than simply killing it.
2025-02-25
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
No data available
2025-02-19
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary sitting
No data available
2025-02-17
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
Not enough data (The speeches lack references to cooperation with colleagues or other political parties.)
2025-02-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
No data available
2025-02-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
No data available
2025-01-29
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
There is no mention of cooperation with intra-parliamentary colleagues, but strong support is expressed for the interventions and proposals put forth by the Chancellor of Justice. The Chancellor of Justice is viewed as a crucial institution that restricts the proliferation of bureaucratic rule and poor legislation.
2025-01-28
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
There is not enough data.
2025-01-27
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
We don't have enough data on the collaboration style.
2025-01-22
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session.
The speaker actively engages in dialogue with colleagues, but this interaction is primarily critical and ironic, using the views of others to contrast them with their own arguments. There is no direct expression of willingness to compromise or engage in cross-party cooperation.
2025-01-22
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing
Insufficient data.
2025-01-15
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
No data available.
2025-01-15
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing
No data is available on cooperation, willingness to compromise, or cross-party activity.
2025-01-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker acts as a critical questioner, demanding explanations and rationale from the rapporteur and the committee. There is no data regarding cooperation, willingness to compromise, or the co-initiation of draft legislation.
2025-01-13
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Not enough data.
2024-12-19
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
Not enough data.
2024-12-18
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
There is too little data.
2024-12-17
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
Data is scarce.
2024-12-11
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The style of cooperation is purely confrontational and uncompromising, focusing on highlighting the mistakes of the government and colleagues. There are no references to cross-party cooperation or the seeking of compromises. He demands intervention from the presiding officer if the presenter refuses to answer his questions, demonstrating procedural rigidity.
2024-12-05
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session.
Data is scarce.
2024-12-04
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting
There is no sign of direct cooperation or willingness to compromise with the government; instead, the focus is on opposing and blocking the government's draft legislation. (The subject) cites the arguments of colleagues (Leo Kunnas, Aivar Kokk) to support their position of opposition.
2024-12-04
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, press briefing
Not enough data
2024-12-03
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The speaker supports EKRE's proposed amendments, demonstrating cooperation with their parliamentary group. He is individually appealing to the conscience of the coalition MPs, calling on them to vote against the draft bill and show that they care about the welfare of children.
2024-11-20
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
Not enough data. In the statements in question, the speaker focuses on criticizing and challenging the opposing side, rather than seeking cooperation or compromises. There are no references to cooperation with colleagues or other factions.
2024-11-19
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session.
The speaker proposes, as a form of cooperation, the mutual organization of non-attached members through the creation of a new faction. This is a pragmatic proposal for collaboration toward a common goal: to open up the opportunity for them to take part in the parliamentary debate.
2024-11-14
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session
Insufficient data.
2024-11-13
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session.
The speaker referenced cooperation within the opposition, noting that representatives from both EKRE and Isamaa have submitted constructive proposals. However, it is stressed that cooperation with the ruling coalition is impossible, as the government merely laughs at their suggestions. Broad-based cooperation between trade unions and employers is supported for the purpose of organizing a general strike.
2024-11-13
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, information briefing
There is not enough data.
2024-11-12
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
Information regarding the cooperation style is unavailable; the speaker focuses on opposing the draft bill and accusing the opposing side of dishonesty and the betrayal of national interests. No willingness to compromise is evident, as the speech concludes with a proposal to suspend the reading.
2024-11-11
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The speaker strongly supports the draft resolution presented by Varro Vooglaid, praising its presentation as "exquisite" and giving it the highest possible mark. He also refers supportively to the statements made by his colleague Urmas Kruuse. There is no direct indication of a willingness to compromise with the opposition; rather, the shortcomings of the opponents are emphasized.
2024-11-07
15th Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session
Even though the speaker is an opposition member, he stresses the necessity of cross-party cooperation, particularly when investigating the circumstances surrounding Rail Baltic. He proposes a pragmatic solution (a support group) that would allow the dirty work to be done and materials to be gathered even if the official investigative commission fails.
2024-11-06
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
Insufficient data. The speaker's focus is on sharply criticizing opponents and demanding answers from them, rather than seeking cooperation or compromise.
2024-11-05
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session
There is no evidence of cooperation, willingness to compromise, or the seeking of cross-party support. The speaker's position is purely critical and aimed at challenging the actions of the government and parliamentary committees.
2024-10-23
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session
Not enough data
2024-10-22
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The speaker positively references a topic raised by a colleague (Anastassia) concerning the ethical suitability of the Minister of Finance, showing a willingness to rely on the arguments of other opposition members. Beyond this, there is no evidence of broader cooperation or a readiness to compromise with the government.
2024-10-17
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary sitting
There is no data available concerning the style of cooperation; the addresses are framed more as questions and legal challenges directed at a specific recipient, demanding that they evaluate the legal line of reasoning presented.
2024-10-16
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
Data is scarce.
2024-10-16
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, press briefing
The speaker refers to the broad-based cooperation between trade and employers' associations in opposing the government's policy. There is no information regarding the speaker's own willingness to cooperate with the government coalition; instead, the unity of the opposing camp is emphasized.
2024-10-15
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session
Not enough data.
2024-10-14
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting
Insufficient data.
2024-10-08
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
This collaborative approach focuses on responding to proposals put forth by the public and officials, citing as an example the draft Hunting Act, which stemmed from concerns raised by an environmental inspector and hunters. He/She stresses that this represented "the people's opinion." There is, however, no information available regarding cross-party cooperation or the search for compromises at the level of the Riigikogu (Parliament).
2024-10-07
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session
There is not enough data.
2024-09-18
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session
Insufficient data
2024-09-17
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
There is no data on cooperation, willingness to compromise, or cross-factional activity.
2024-09-16
The 15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting.
Not enough data.
2024-09-11
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session
Insufficient data
2024-09-11
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, press briefing.
There is no information regarding a willingness to cooperate or compromise. The speaker's focus is aimed at scrutinizing and challenging the actions of the government and parliamentary procedures.
2024-09-09
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
There is insufficient data on cooperation patterns. The speech concludes with a direct question to the minister, seeking his approval for his stance on the necessity of subsidies.
2024-07-29
The 15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu.
There is not enough data.
2024-07-29
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
The speaker detailed successful cooperation in establishing opposition alliances, citing the blocking of the WHO agreement—achieved through collaboration with 11 members of the Riigikogu—as a prime example. This demonstrates the capacity to form resistance coalitions centered on specific issues. There is absolutely no mention of a willingness to compromise or cooperate with the ruling government coalition.
2024-07-22
15th Riigikogu, Riigikogu's extraordinary session.
Data is scarce.
2024-07-15
15th Riigikogu, Extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
Information regarding the willingness to cooperate is unavailable; the speaker concentrates on attacking and issuing warnings about the coalition's actions, demanding the rejection of the bill. No mention is made of bipartisan or cross-party cooperation.
2024-06-19
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, extra plenary sitting
This demonstrates collaboration with a colleague from his faction (Varro Vooglaid), who gave him the floor. There is no indication whatsoever of a willingness for compromise or cross-party cooperation on the topic discussed, as the position is purely confrontational.
2024-06-12
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session.
Insufficient data.
2024-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
Not enough data.
2024-06-05
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The style of cooperation is predominantly confrontational, but he addresses colleague Kivimägi politely regarding the extension of time. He defends another politician's (Reinsalu) right to withdraw the amendment proposal, thereby showing support for procedural rights within the opposition. There is no indication of a willingness to compromise with government circles.
2024-06-05
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
No data available.
2024-06-03
Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary sitting.
The cooperation style demonstrates an openness to discussing ideas with colleagues (e.g., with Varro regarding biometric data), while seeking technical solutions to improve security. There is no data regarding cooperation with other factions or a willingness to compromise.
2024-05-29
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The speaker attempts to establish common ground by citing examples, including those involving coalition MPs (Siim Kallas), whom the media has unfairly accused, in order to demonstrate the universal necessity of the draft legislation. He asks his colleagues to support the bill or at least send it to the second reading so that it can be further refined. Direct cooperation with other factions is not described.
2024-05-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
There is not enough data.
2024-05-09
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The collaborative style is evident in the public acknowledgment of like-minded colleagues (Ants Frosch and Varro Vooglaid) for being present in the chamber, highlighting the fact that at least two people are actually in the hall.
2024-05-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session.
The cooperation style is evident in the support for Helir-Valdor Seeder's proposal to suspend the reading, which points to a readiness to act alongside like-minded colleagues. Overall, however, the speaker’s style is confrontational and demanding, focusing on challenging the actions of the Riigikogu Board and insisting on strict adherence to legality.
2024-05-07
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The collaborative style is rather demanding, but the speaker supportively references the previous speaker, Anastasia, who also emphasized the equal treatment of Riigikogu members. Overall, the focus tends to be on insisting on rule adherence rather than seeking compromises.
2024-05-02
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
Insufficient data
2024-04-30
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Third Session, Plenary Session.
There is no data regarding cooperation. The speaker's focus is on the direct and intense criticism of the actions taken by the ministers and the government.
2024-04-29
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
There is no evidence of seeking cooperation or a readiness to compromise; the style is rather confrontational and directly challenging, presenting criticism toward both the President of the Bank of Estonia and the head of government. The only positive remark was the appreciation of the Bank of Estonia President’s honesty in admitting a lack of knowledge.
2024-04-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
Insufficient data available. The speaker primarily focuses on confrontation with the session chair and the presenters, with no indication of cooperation or willingness to compromise with other colleagues.
2024-04-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, information briefing
The style of cooperation is evident through joint opposition actions, specifically mentioning the joint letter sent by 11 members of parliament to the WHO. It also points to collaboration with non-governmental organizations (NGOs) regarding the WHO pandemic treaty, which demonstrates a readiness to consolidate anti-government forces.
2024-04-16
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The speaker demonstrates a willingness to collaborate by supporting and affirming the criticism raised by another MP (Arvo Aller, who hails from a different region). This indicates a readiness to form a broad, cross-regional consensus aimed at solving the problems facing rural areas.
2024-04-10
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
There is not enough data.
2024-04-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
There is insufficient data.
2024-04-04
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The style of cooperation is formal and focuses on dialogue with the session chair, requiring the clear and consistent application of rules. Information regarding broader cooperation or a willingness to compromise with other factions is absent.
2024-04-03
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session
Data unavailable.
2024-04-02
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting
The collaborative approach is aimed at securing institutional support and achieving legal consensus with the presiding officer of the session, specifically by requesting their position on the matter of a potential legal violation. The speaker seeks confirmation of their own legal interpretation, emphasizing their reliance on the chairman's judicial competence.
2024-04-01
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
Insufficient data.
2024-03-19
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
There is not enough data.
2024-03-18
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
There is little data available regarding the cooperation style, but the speaker makes an unusual point of noting agreement with Jürgen Ligi's statement about the poor optics of the situation. Generally, he focuses on defending individuals targeted by the system (Kalle Laanet) and bringing attention to their cases.
2024-03-13
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting.
Not enough data
2024-03-12
15th Riigikogu, 3rd plenary sitting
Data is scarce.
2024-03-11
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
Information is scarce. The speaker refers to colleague Moonika Helme's address to the Chair of the sitting, but there is no information regarding formal cooperation, compromises, or coalitions.
2024-03-06
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
Not enough data.
2024-03-06
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, press briefing
The collaborative style is evident in the way they refer to colleagues seated in the chamber ("the majority of those seated in the hall, good colleagues, assert") to confirm broader support for their viewpoint. There is absolutely no willingness to compromise with the presiding officer, as they insist on the strict observance of the rules.
2024-03-05
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session
Not enough data
2024-03-04
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The speaker recognized the education and competence of opposition colleague Mart Helme when describing poverty, referring to him as the only person fit for the office of prime minister. However, disagreement was expressed regarding Mart Helme's assessment of Kaja Kallas's incompetence, arguing instead that Kallas is acting deliberately. There is no information available regarding cross-party cooperation.
2024-02-21
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
Collaboration is being sought during the bill's processing phase so that it moves forward to the committee and the second reading, allowing for amendments to be proposed, based on the principle that "no one person is wise on their own." Reference is made to previous positive feedback on the content of the bill (from Aadu Must and Rein Lang), which indicates a clear readiness for a substantive discussion.
2024-02-21
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The collaborative approach is aimed at seeking advice from the presiding officer to find a solution consistent with parliamentary rules of procedure regarding the minister’s alleged unethical conduct. This demonstrates a willingness to adhere to the parliament’s standing orders, even in the face of strong opposition.
2024-02-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
There is not enough data.
2024-02-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
There is no evidence of cooperation, willingness to compromise, or cross-party activity. The focus remains sharp criticism of government policy and holding the minister accountable.
2024-02-07
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting.
He is the co-author, along with Kert Kingo, of the draft amendment to the Law on the Prosecutor's Office and the Courts Act, which demonstrates clear cooperation toward a specific legislative objective. He actively participates in the debate, answering questions and interacting with colleagues, but his views regarding the impunity of the Prosecutor's Office are rigid and uncompromising.
2024-02-05
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting
There is too little data.
2024-01-25
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The working style in parliament is confrontational and uncompromising, particularly regarding the chairman and members of the Environment Committee, whom he accuses of unethical conduct. Outside of parliament, he collaborates closely with interest groups representing both the supporters of the draft bill and those filing complaints, stressing the importance of representing their concerns within the Riigikogu.
2024-01-24
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
Insufficient data
2024-01-24
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
Not enough data
2024-01-23
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The collaborative approach is aimed at calling on colleagues to restore critical thinking and involving all professional associations and specialists who have dared to hold an opinion different from the mainstream. It emphasizes the need to bring "out from the underground" scientists and doctors who are afraid to speak publicly. The willingness to discuss proposed amendments within the commission is also mentioned.
2024-01-22
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
This style of cooperation is aimed at mobilizing political allies (referencing Arvo Aller and Mart Helme) and the broad public (teachers, the 76,000 people who signed against the car tax) against the government. The speaker emphasizes the need to rally together and stand united to oppose the government's policy. There are no references to a willingness to compromise or cross-party cooperation.
2024-01-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The speaker submitted the draft bill for amending the Income Tax Act in cooperation with Varro Vooglaid. He acknowledges colleague Jürgen Ligi's call for a substantive discussion and refers to a positive and reasoned conversation with General Ants Laaneots on the topic of taxation, demonstrating a readiness for substantive dialogue.
2024-01-16
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The speaker refers favorably to the issue raised by Kert Kingo and her legislative proposal, indicating cooperation or a convergence of views on this particular legal matter. The interaction with the rapporteur is corrective in nature (specifically concerning the role of the Prosecutor's Office), yet a polite tone is maintained.
2024-01-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
A cooperative style is evident with fellow opposition members, as they were among those who submitted the formal query (Mart Maastik, Mart Helme, Martin Helme, Anti Poolamets, Kalle Grünthal). The relationship with the government is purely confrontational and uncompromising, focusing on exposing the government’s mistakes.
2024-01-11
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The speaker advocates finding consensus and tolerance, emphasizing that the opposition has quite often supported government bills as well. Appreciation is expressed for the relevant remarks made by colleagues Joller and Lutsar, indicating a readiness for cooperation and for moving the bill forward to the second reading. It is demanded that family doctors also have a say in the legislative process.
2024-01-10
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
Insufficient data.
2024-01-10
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
Insufficient data.
2024-01-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
Not enough data.