By Plenary Sessions: Kalle Grünthal

The political stance is strongly oppositional, centering on alleged violations of rule of law principles (specifically, the presumption of innocence) and sharp criticism of the government’s economic policy (the tax system). The most intense resistance is aimed at the concept of social gender, which is dismissed as "utter nonsense" and a social deviation. The focus operates within two frameworks: one value-based (the constitution, traditional sexes/genders) and one criticizing the government’s actions (economic protests).

The political position is strongly anti-government, focusing on legal and political disputes, particularly regarding the unjustified raising of fine rates. The speaker calls into question the ethical fitness of the Minister of Finance, citing a conflict of interest and a personality disorder. Furthermore, strong opposition is voiced regarding the harmonization of European Union regulations, which, in the speaker's assessment, limits Estonia's sovereignty and independence.

The political focus is on the constitutional protection of property rights. The speaker adopts a strong, value-based stance, arguing that the current legal provision limiting the terms of alienation is unconstitutional because it infringes upon the inviolability of property (Article 32 of the Constitution). It is stressed that the Constitution must also be applied in practice, ensuring the equal protection of property.

The political stance is strongly opposed to the government’s actions and specific legislative proposals, particularly concerning prison logistics, highlighting significant additional costs and the fact that the Riigikogu (Parliament) was kept uninformed. A core value is the linkage between national security and the well-being of the populace, emphasizing social satisfaction as a key metric for evaluating government performance. The speaker questions the government's capacity to ensure the welfare of the people, citing widespread protests and planned strikes. The underlying framework is heavily performance-driven and values-based.

The speaker strongly opposes the government's budget cuts, arguing that they are devastating the economy and will lead to widespread strikes. He/She emphasizes the negative repercussions of the government's actions on both internal security and the economy, specifically highlighting the administration's poor performance. The political stance is fiercely oppositional, directly linking the budgetary policy to the social and economic crisis.

The political stance is fiercely oppositional, centered on resisting tax hikes and criticizing the government's handling of the budget. The politician stresses the necessity of directing substantial allocated funds toward struggling social and cultural sectors. The criticism targets the government's inconsistency and its failure to uphold past promises, framing the matter as both a policy failure and a question of core values (honesty).

The political position is strongly oppositional, focusing on protecting citizens' rights and ensuring honest governance. The speaker firmly opposes raising medical fees (for visits, prescriptions, and hospital stays), citing a violation of the Constitution, and sharply criticizes the removal of the educational requirement for the State Secretary, labeling it a corrupt bargain. The platform is strongly value-driven, emphasizing constitutionalism and the principles of the rule of law.

The political position heavily emphasizes government accountability, demanding the criminalization of false statements made by ministers as a measure to prevent anti-state activity. Furthermore, the politician supports social justice, initiating a bill to exempt pensioners and other beneficiaries from paying the hunting fee. His/Her policy is aimed at ensuring honesty and protecting the welfare of contributing citizens, while sharply criticizing "deceitful globalist politics."

The political position is strongly opposed to government-backed mega-projects, such as Rail Baltic, which are viewed less as serving the public good and more as a vehicle for exporting Estonia's natural resources and raw materials. Furthermore, the speaker criticizes specific traffic management solutions (rubber bollards), deeming them serious impediments to traffic flow. These viewpoints are presented through a framework of intense criticism and suspicion (based on both values and results).