By Plenary Sessions: Kalle Grünthal

Economic views are critical of the current tax system, which is deemed unsuccessful and has resulted in a protest action by the hospitality sector (cafés, restaurants, accommodation establishments). This signals opposition to the Reform Party's fiscal policy and support for the business sector's concerns.

The discussion covers customs tariffs and the stiffening of corresponding penalty rates, which the speaker opposes unless violations are properly substantiated. This indicates resistance to overly stringent regulatory interference that could potentially harm economic activity, and it underscores the danger of a conflict of interest regarding the Minister of Finance's conduct.

Economic perspectives are articulated through the protection of property rights, which, pursuant to Article 32 of the Constitution, are considered inviolable and equally protected. Emphasis is placed on the necessity of guaranteeing the inviolability of property through legal norms that preclude its limitation by time limits in lower-tier legislation.

Economic perspectives emphasize financial savings and optimal solutions, standing in opposition to draft legislation that would result in over a million euros of additional cost to the taxpayer. The speaker is concerned about the costs borne by taxpayers due to chambers that have been constructed but remain unused. Labor concerns are also addressed, referencing Estonian Railways' planned strikes and the dissatisfaction expressed by employers.

The speaker is strongly opposed to budget cuts, arguing that, in their view, these measures will destroy the economy and lead to labor disputes. They expressed solidarity with the concerns of both employer associations and the railway workers planning a strike, stressing the importance of economic growth.

Economic views are strongly opposed to tax increases, emphasizing that high taxes stifle entrepreneurship and reduce people's incomes. At the same time, there is support for directing state financial resources (transferable sums) toward struggling social and cultural sectors, which indicates a certain degree of support for redistribution.

The speaker criticizes the government's spending priorities, arguing that they "are funneling millions everywhere else but neglecting their own people." They strongly oppose raising medical user fees, stating that this makes it harder for people to make ends meet and access essential services, and citing the necessity of ensuring social protection.

The economic perspective strongly opposes tax increases, arguing that they cut into people's incomes and stifle both consumption and the ability to invest. He criticizes the government’s assertions regarding the positive impact of tax hikes, labeling them a deliberate falsehood. He also supports eliminating minor state fees for pensioners, citing their previous contributions to society, as well as the high fuel costs incurred when performing duties as hunters.

Economic positions are tied to national resource protection, opposing projects that facilitate the export of Estonian minerals and raw materials under the guise of European Union funding. This points to a protectionist approach regarding the use of the country's resources.