By Plenary Sessions: Kalle Grünthal

The speaker was highly active during the plenary session, submitting multiple questions and comments to various ministers and rapporteurs in a short timeframe. Their pattern of activity indicates a focus on both procedural matters (the tradition of flowers) and substantive debates (rule of law, economy, social issues).

We only have data regarding one plenary session, during which the speaker posed three questions to the rapporteur, focusing specifically on the issues of penal policy and conflict of interest.

The pattern of activity is confined to the questions and viewpoints presented during the plenary session, which are concentrated on a single day and a single specific legal topic. The pattern indicates a focus on detailed legal challenging within the framework of the parliamentary debate.

The speaker was active during the plenary session, posing short, sharp questions to several ministers (including the Minister of Finance and the minister responsible for the justice portfolio). This pattern of activity involves detailed criticism of the government's actions and draft legislation, as well as referencing recent demonstrations and news reports.

The speaker's pattern of activity is linked to the format of the Riigikogu Information Session, during which they pose questions to the minister. They base their questions on recent media reports (TV3 news) and public appeals.

Not enough data.

The speaker was highly active during the plenary session on October 14, repeatedly intervening with questions directed at the minister, as well as offering critical procedural remarks regarding the handling of draft legislation. They consistently posed repeated follow-up questions, accusing the ministers of evading a response.

The speaker is an active initiator of legislation, submitting amendments to both the Hunting Act and the Penal Code. He refers to direct communication with constituents and officials, citing, for example, a proposal from the Järva County Hunting Club Council and an environmental inspector, which prompted the submission of the draft Hunting Act.

There is not enough data.