By Plenary Sessions: Peeter Ernits

There is no evidence of cooperation, willingness to compromise, or bipartisan activity. The focus is entirely on sharply criticizing the process and the draft law.

The style of collaboration is formal, focusing on addressing questions to the rapporteur while strictly maintaining parliamentary etiquette ("Mr. Speaker!"). There is no evidence of cross-party cooperation, willingness to compromise, or the joint initiation of bills.

Insufficient data.

The speaker refers to collaboration with colleagues (Märt Otsa) and emphasizes the alignment of their positions with the Chancellor of Justice regarding the dangerous nature of the RAB law. He calls upon other members of parliament to jointly scrap the dangerous draft bill (the RAB law), citing the desire to build broad-based opposition to totalitarian tendencies.

In terms of cooperation, there is a clear readiness to request that the information obtained from the minister be shared with other colleagues ("maybe even others"), emphasizing the wider availability of this data. However, communication with the ministers is mostly confrontational and critical.

The speaker supports the coalition's draft bill (the Tokyo Convention Protocol), which is not substantially controversial, thereby demonstrating a willingness to support straightforward legislation. However, he sharply criticizes the prevailing atmosphere where substantive debate has been replaced by ignoring the opposition, noting that the parliament's true purpose should be "the pursuit of real truth."

The speaker calls upon all colleagues who value children's welfare and the basic quality of legislation to support the amendment bill. This indicates a desire to achieve broad-based support for technical amendments that are beneficial to society.

Even though the speaker is extremely antagonistic toward the government, he concedes that the demographic crisis and the survival of the state are "a common concern for all of us." He suggests that the coalition and the opposition should stop glaring at one another, but he sees the only solution as the complete dismantling of the existing system and starting anew with trustworthy individuals.

The speaker does not focus on direct cooperation but notes that the opposition parties (Isamaa, EKRE, Center Party) are submitting similar, necessary bills, which points to a shared concern. He does not show any openness to compromise with the government, but rather emphasizes the futility of their actions.

The speaker referred to discussions between various beekeepers' associations and the ministry, but characterized this communication as a failed game of "Chinese whispers," which resulted in an unfair outcome. He is now seeking confirmation from the minister that the situation will improve next year, indicating a clear desire to rectify the situation.