By Plenary Sessions: Peeter Ernits
Total Sessions: 50
Fully Profiled: 50
2025-10-16
XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
The cooperative style is evident in the questions posed to the presenter, who is an expert in the food service industry, as they seek confirmation of the government's unreasonable opposition. There is no information available regarding inter-party or intra-coalition cooperation.
2025-10-15
The 15th Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
Data on active cooperation during the current session is lacking, but he/she points to earlier broad-based support for the direct presidential election initiative (45 colleagues). It is noted that a certain draft bill lacks the signatures of representatives from two political parties, indicating limited cross-parliamentary cooperation. He/She quotes other politicians (Kata Tüttő, Arvo Aller, the Social Democrats) who share similar positions on regional development and budget matters.
2025-10-13
15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
Insufficient data. The speaker is primarily engaged in criticizing the government and raising questions; there are no references to cooperation with colleagues or other political parties.
2025-10-08
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
There is little data on the cooperation style, but he/she notes the consensus achieved in the commission regarding both placing the draft on the agenda and concluding the first reading, as well as his/her appointment as representative. This suggests participation in consensual procedural work, even though he/she expresses substantive skepticism.
2025-10-07
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
There is no direct evidence of cooperation or readiness to compromise with the minister; the speaker's style is purely confrontational. The only reference to colleagues is the mention of Aivar Sõerd, who is also struggling with the minister’s materials, pointing to an indirect shared concern.
2025-10-06
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
There is no sign of direct cooperation with the coalition; instead, he emphasizes his disagreement with and opposition to the government's policies. He also points out that other colleagues do not approve of the Tidö agreement, and mentions his role as a member of the parliamentary group for Ukraine.
2025-09-25
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
The speaker clearly supports the positions and procedural issues raised by opposition colleagues (such as Jüri Jaanson and Urmas Reinsalu). He/She views the coalition's actions as a "steamroller" that rules out any compromise or substantive cooperation with the opposition, since, in his/her estimation, the proposed amendments are simply being thrown in the trash.
2025-09-23
15th Riigikogu, 6th session, plenary session
Refers to cooperation with their faction regarding the minister's attendance, and notes similar positions with other deputies concerning the timing of the minister's appearance. Overall, however, the style is rather challenging and demanding towards the leadership of the government and the commission. No direct openness to compromise is evident; rather, accountability is demanded.
2025-09-22
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
Although generally critical, the speaker sincerely praises Prime Minister Michal’s initiative to establish the council of economic advisors, viewing it as a positive step toward involving experts. He/She also supports the proposal put forward by colleague Helmen Kütt (SDE) to bring party leaders together with the Prime Minister for a genuine discussion, emphasizing the critical need for cooperation.
2025-09-18
15th Estonian Parliament, 6th sitting, plenary session.
There are no direct references to cooperation with other factions or seeking compromise on political issues. However, the speaker offers assistance to the chair in resolving a technical issue (sending the picture of the President of the Bank of Estonia), demonstrating a readiness to provide procedural assistance.
2025-09-17
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting.
The style of cooperation is mostly confrontational and critical, but the speaker points to the possibility of collaborating on specific, consensus-driven issues (e.g., the draft bill for establishing shelters). He/She stresses that they should focus on "small, manageable tasks" where party affiliation is not important.
2025-09-17
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, press briefing.
Neither cooperation nor a willingness to compromise is expressed; the context is rather adversarial. The presence of Toomas Järveoja, a colleague from the Reform Party, is mentioned neutrally, highlighting his exceptional nature.
2025-09-16
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.
He commends the Chancellor of Justice and Kilvar Kessler for their excellent presentations, showing respect for institutional expertise. There is no reference to a bipartisan or cross-factional compromise, focusing instead on attacking the political initiatives of opponents.
2025-09-15
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting
It does not indicate direct cooperation with other political parties, but mentions a previous inquiry by colleagues (EKRE) regarding deer. The style is predominantly confrontational and uncompromising, publicly calling on public sector employees (teachers, rescuers, police officers) to strike against the government in order to achieve a pay raise.
2025-09-11
15th Riigikogu, 6th plenary sitting
The speaker demonstrates an appreciative attitude toward the presenter, praising the clarity and insight of their talk, which indicates a readiness to acknowledge quality work and clear arguments.
2025-09-10
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
There are few direct signs of cooperation, but the speaker references issues and concerns raised by colleagues (Solman, Reinsalu), demonstrating the existence of a certain unified oppositional front. The emphasis is placed more on the lack of consensus and ideological differences within the government (e.g., the 5:4 division on family policy).
2025-09-10
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, press briefing
Insufficient data.
2025-09-09
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session.
It recognizes the consensus on the need to defend the Estonian state, but emphasizes major disagreements regarding strategy. There is no reference whatsoever to active cooperation or a willingness to compromise with the government; the style is rather confrontational and accusatory. It refers to the example of Finland to demonstrate how one should interact and operate with neighbors.
2025-09-08
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
The speaker is primarily confrontational, but recognizes positive outcomes when they occur (specifically, the rescue of the Iisaku seedlings, for which both the Minister and the head of RMK are thanked). He/She also references collaboration with other opposition colleagues (Riina Sikkut, Jaak Valge, the Social Democrats) in bringing up the topics of immigration and unemployment, stressing the necessity for a more serious debate.
2025-09-04
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
It demonstrates a readiness and capacity for quick and effective cooperation, citing the positive example of communication with RMK CEO Mikk Marran and Minister Andres Sutt, which resulted in the Iisaku nursery problem being resolved over the course of a single weekend. This clearly indicates a preference for direct and rapid problem-solving.
2025-06-19
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
There is no evidence of cooperation, willingness to compromise, or bipartisan activity. The focus is entirely on sharply criticizing the process and the draft law.
2025-06-18
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The style of collaboration is formal, focusing on addressing questions to the rapporteur while strictly maintaining parliamentary etiquette ("Mr. Speaker!"). There is no evidence of cross-party cooperation, willingness to compromise, or the joint initiation of bills.
2025-06-18
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing
Insufficient data.
2025-06-17
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker refers to collaboration with colleagues (Märt Otsa) and emphasizes the alignment of their positions with the Chancellor of Justice regarding the dangerous nature of the RAB law. He calls upon other members of parliament to jointly scrap the dangerous draft bill (the RAB law), citing the desire to build broad-based opposition to totalitarian tendencies.
2025-06-16
XV Riigikogu, V Session, Plenary Sitting
In terms of cooperation, there is a clear readiness to request that the information obtained from the minister be shared with other colleagues ("maybe even others"), emphasizing the wider availability of this data. However, communication with the ministers is mostly confrontational and critical.
2025-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The speaker supports the coalition's draft bill (the Tokyo Convention Protocol), which is not substantially controversial, thereby demonstrating a willingness to support straightforward legislation. However, he sharply criticizes the prevailing atmosphere where substantive debate has been replaced by ignoring the opposition, noting that the parliament's true purpose should be "the pursuit of real truth."
2025-06-10
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting.
The speaker calls upon all colleagues who value children's welfare and the basic quality of legislation to support the amendment bill. This indicates a desire to achieve broad-based support for technical amendments that are beneficial to society.
2025-06-09
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Even though the speaker is extremely antagonistic toward the government, he concedes that the demographic crisis and the survival of the state are "a common concern for all of us." He suggests that the coalition and the opposition should stop glaring at one another, but he sees the only solution as the complete dismantling of the existing system and starting anew with trustworthy individuals.
2025-06-04
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker does not focus on direct cooperation but notes that the opposition parties (Isamaa, EKRE, Center Party) are submitting similar, necessary bills, which points to a shared concern. He does not show any openness to compromise with the government, but rather emphasizes the futility of their actions.
2025-06-02
15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session
The speaker referred to discussions between various beekeepers' associations and the ministry, but characterized this communication as a failed game of "Chinese whispers," which resulted in an unfair outcome. He is now seeking confirmation from the minister that the situation will improve next year, indicating a clear desire to rectify the situation.
2025-05-21
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
Insufficient data.
2025-05-20
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
There is not enough data.
2025-05-19
15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
Insufficient data.
2025-05-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
There is insufficient data. The speaker refers to the previous positions of other colleagues (Mart, Martin Helme), but does not mention active cooperation, willingness to compromise, or the co-initiation of bills.
2025-05-13
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
Insufficient data.
2025-05-08
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
Insufficient data.
2025-05-07
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The speaker notes the similarity with the previous speaker's position, indicating a readiness to support similar views. Direct cooperation or the search for compromise is not mentioned.
2025-05-06
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker strongly emphasizes the need for cooperation in Estonia's interests, deeming it sensible from a cost-saving perspective. He commends the coalition's reasonable conduct while processing the opposition's draft bill, calling it a superb example that demonstrates the need for much greater cooperation. He calls for collaborative efforts in amending legislation to avoid the constant need for minor adjustments.
2025-05-05
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
There is not enough data.
2025-04-24
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The style of cooperation is primarily confrontational and critical, focusing on thwarting government plans and demanding investigations. However, the speaker emphasizes the common goal of ensuring a better life for the Estonian people, regardless of party affiliation, which suggests a desire for shared outcomes.
2025-04-23
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker engages with colleagues (Reili, Kalle), recognizing their appeals concerning the support of women, but immediately leverages these appeals as a platform for broader criticism of the government. He/She votes in favor of the draft bill, despite strong criticism regarding both the procedure and the focus. The text does not mention any direct cooperation or readiness to compromise with other parties.
2025-04-22
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The collaborative style is formally polite ("Dear Madam Minister"), yet substantively confrontational and demanding, focusing on the Minister's accountability and the clarification of her views. There is no information available regarding attempts to seek cooperation with other members of the Riigikogu.
2025-04-21
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The style of interaction is formal and polite when addressing the rapporteur during the parliamentary question-and-answer session. There is no indication of cross-party collaboration or willingness to compromise.
2025-04-16
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
Although the speaker acknowledges the potential cooperation between the opposition and the coalition ("it's excellent if the opposition and coalition work in sync"), he is skeptical about its scope, demanding precise data. He also stresses the need for internal clarity and agreements within the committee, criticizing the inability of two intelligent people (Annely and Aivar Kokk) to reach a consensus regarding the land tax.
2025-04-15
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
Not enough data
2025-04-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
There is no direct reference to cross-party cooperation, but the speaker addresses the current prime minister, attempting to convince him to speak plainly and acknowledging that he is more reasonable than his predecessor. He is collaborating with external experts and calls upon colleagues (investigative journalists) to research the topic further, offering them a subject worthy of the Bonnier Prize.
2025-04-10
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker demonstrates a willingness to cooperate with the Chancellor of Justice, promising to implement his amendments, but there is no mention of cooperation with parliamentary colleagues. He supportively references the attempts by the opposition parties (Isamaa and EKRE) to amend the car tax, but stresses their failure due to the coalition's opposition.
2025-04-09
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The style of cooperation is strictly oppositional and controlling. The speaker concentrates on criticizing and challenging the government’s actions, with no mention of a willingness to compromise or any indication of cross-party cooperation.
2025-04-08
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
No data available
2025-04-07
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Colleagues are addressed respectfully, which suggests a willingness to operate within the parliamentary structure. However, the speech does not mention specific cooperation, readiness for compromise, or cross-party activity.